Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 399

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Improvement of Overall Survival in Advanced Stage Mantle Cell Lymphoma

Herrmann, Annina, Hoster, Eva, Zwingers, Thomas, Brittinger, Günter, Engelhard, Marianne, Meusers, Peter, Reiser, Marcel, Forstpointner, Roswitha, Metzner, Bernd, Peter, Norma, Wörmann, Bernhard, Trümper, Lorenz, Pfreundschuh, Michael, Einsele, Hermann, Hiddemann, Wolfgang, Unterhalt, Michael, Dreyling, Martin·2009·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: Mantle cell lymphomas (MCLs) represent a clinically aggressive lymphoma subtype with a poor prognosis. To explore a potential progress in outcome a historical comparison was performed using data from the Kiel Lymphoma Study Group (KLSG; 1975 to 1986) and the German Low Grade Lymphoma Study Group (GLSG; 1996 to 2004). Patients and Methods: All patients with the histologically confirmed diagnosis of advanced-stage nonblastoid MCL were eligible. To minimize the potential heterogeneity of different risk profiles frequency matching was pursued. In addition, we adjusted for potential confounding variables by multiple Cox regression. Results: A total of 520 patients were assessable, 150 from KLSG and 370 from GLSG studies. The median overall survival was 2.7 years for KLSG patients as compared with 4.8 years for GLSG patients (P < .0001). The 5-year survival rates were 22% in the KLSG group (95% CI, 13% to 31%) as compared with 47% for GLSG treated patients (95% CI, 38% to 55%). The hazard ratio adjusted for performance status, lactate dehydrogenase, and age was 0.44 for GLSG patients (95% CI, 0.32 to 0.59). Conclusion: Median overall survival of patients with advanced nonblastoid MCL almost doubled during the past 30 years. Potential reasons for this apparent improvement in overall survival include the application of anthracycline-containing regimens and new approaches, such as antilymphoma antibodies or stem cell transplantation. Advances in general supportive care, new diagnostic tools, and general improvement of life span might have also reinforced this effect. However, our results are questioning the validity of historical comparisons which had been frequently applied in previous trials.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2008.16.8435

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 399

Metadata

Authors
Herrmann, A., Hoster, E., Zwingers, T., Brittinger, G., Engelhard, M., Meusers, P., Reiser, M., Forstpointner, R., Metzner, B., Peter, N., Wörmann, B., Trümper, L., Pfreundschuh, M., Einsele, H., Hiddemann, W., Unterhalt, M., & Dreyling, M.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2009-02-01
Volume
27
Issue
4
Pages
511-518
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2029511375
Cited by
399
References
0
FWCI
18.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improvement of Overall Survival in Advanced Stage Mantle Cell Lymphoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2008.16.8435
The paper
Herrmann, A., Hoster, E., Zwingers, T., Brittinger, G., Engelhard, M., Meusers, P., Reiser, M., Forstpointner, R., Metzner, B., Peter, N., Wörmann, B., Trümper, L., Pfreundschuh, M., Einsele, H., Hiddemann, W., Unterhalt, M., & Dreyling, M. (2009). Improvement of Overall Survival in Advanced Stage Mantle Cell Lymphoma. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2008.16.8435

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.