Cited by 53Breast Cancer Treatment StudiesEstrogen and related hormone effectsAdvanced Breast Cancer Therapies

Up-front use of aromatase inhibitors as adjuvant therapy for breast cancer: the emperor has no clothes

Open access
Seruga, Bostjan, Tannock, Ian F.·2009·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

nology assessment on adjuvant use of aromatase inhibitors (AIs) was updated to indicate that optimal adjuvant endocrine therapy for post-menopausal women with receptor-positive breast cancer should in-clude an AI, either as up-front therapy or as sequential therapy after tamoxifen.1 This recommendation was on the basis of improved disease-free survival (DFS) observed with AIs, given that no trial at that time had demonstrated improvement in overall survival. This recommendation and thepublicity relating to trials such as theArimi-dex, Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination (ATAC) trial have had substantial impact worldwide on the endocrine treatment of early breast cancer.2 On the basis of the recent published update of the ATAC trial with a median 8 or more years of follow-up, and the report at the San Antonio Breast CancerMeeting inDecember 2007, advertisements proclaim that the long-term data demonstrate con-tinuing effectiveness for anastrozole over tamoxifen through treat-

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2008.19.5594

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Seruga, B., & Tannock, I. F.
Affiliations
  • Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (CA)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2009-02-20
Volume
27
Issue
6
Pages
840-842
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2155357724
Cited by
53
References
33
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4
FWCI
3.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Estrogen and related hormone effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
Keywords
aromatase inhibitors, adjuvant endocrine therapy, early breast cancer, anastrozole, tamoxifen, ATAC trial, disease-free survival, overall survival, postmenopausal women, sequential endocrine therapy
MeSH terms
Breast Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Survival Analysis, Disease-Free Survival, Neoadjuvant Therapy, Aromatase Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review