Cited by 102Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentProstate Cancer Treatment and ResearchBreast Cancer Treatment Studies

MDM2 and Ki-67 predict for distant metastasis and mortality in men treated with radiotherapy and androgen deprivation for prostate cancer: RTOG 92-02

Open access
Khor, Li-Yan, Bae, Kyounghwa, Paulus, Rebecca, Al-Saleem, Tahseen, Hammond, M. Elizabeth, Grignon, David J., Che, Mingxin, Venkatesan, Varagur +5 more·2009·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

PURPOSE MDM2 regulates p53, which controls cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. Both proteins, along with Ki-67, which is an established strong determinant of metastasis, have shown promise in predicting the outcome of men treated with radiation therapy (RT) with or without short-term androgen deprivation (STAD). This report compares the utility of abnormal expression of these biomarkers in estimating progression in a cohort of men treated on RTOG 92-02. PATIENTS AND METHODS Adequate tissue for immunohistochemistry was available for p53, Ki-67, and MDM2 analyses in 478 patient cases. The percentage of tumor nuclei staining positive (PSP) was quantified manually or by image analysis, and the per-sample mean intensity score (MIS) was quantified by image analysis. Cox regression models were used to estimate overall mortality (OM), and Fine and Gray's regressions were applied to the end points of distant metastasis (DM) and cause-specific mortality (CSM). Results In multivariate analyses that adjusted for all markers and treatment covariates, MDM2 overexpression was significantly related to DM (P = .02) and OM (P = .003), and Ki-67 overexpression was significantly related to DM (P < .0001), CSM (P = .0007), and OM (P = .01). P53 overexpression was significantly related to OM (P = .02). When considered in combination, the overexpression of both Ki-67 and MDM2 at high levels was associated with significantly increased failure rates for all end points (P < .001 for DM, CSM, and OM). CONCLUSION Combined MDM2 and Ki-67 expression levels were independently related to distant metastasis and mortality and, if validated, could be considered for risk stratification of patients with prostate cancer in clinical trials.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2008.19.8267

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In prostate cancer, higher Mdm2 levels go together with a greater chance that the cancer will spread.

    “Elevated Mdm2 expression is also associated with increased risk of metastasis in prostate cancer [99].”

    From The p53 orchestra: Mdm2 and Mdmx set the tone (2010) · cites this paper as [99]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Khor, L.-Y., Bae, K., Paulus, R., Al-Saleem, T., Hammond, M. E., Grignon, D. J., Che, M., Venkatesan, V., Byhardt, R. W., Rotman, M., Hanks, G. E., Sandler, H. M., & Pollack, A.
Affiliations
  • American College of Radiology (US)
  • From the Department of Pathology, Drexel University College of Medicine; Department of Statistics, Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, American College of Radiology; and Departments of Pathology and of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; Department of Pathology, LDS Hospital, Intermountain Health Care, Salt Lake City, UT; Department of Pathology, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN; Department of Anatomic Pathology, Quest Diagnostics Incorporated, Schaumberg, IL; Radiation...
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2009-07-01
Volume
27
Issue
19
Pages
3177-3184
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2104220131
Cited by
102
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 7
FWCI
7.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Pennsylvania Department of Health
  • Varian Medical Systems
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA101984, U10CA032115, CA 006927, CA101984, U10CA021661, P30CA006927)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Keywords
prostate cancer, MDM2, Ki-67, p53, distant metastasis, all-cause mortality, cause-specific mortality, androgen deprivation therapy, radiotherapy, prognostic factors, risk stratification
MeSH terms
Androgen Antagonists, Combined Modality Therapy, Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Immunohistochemistry, Male, Neoplasm Invasiveness, Prognosis, Prostatic Neoplasms, Radiotherapy, Biomarkers, Tumor, Gene Expression, Tumor Suppressor Protein p53, Treatment Outcome, Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal, Ki-67 Antigen, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-mdm2, Kaplan-Meier Estimate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review