The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
End Point Assessment in Gliomas: Novel Treatments Limit Usefulness of Classical Macdonald's Criteria
Open accessAbstract
Recent trials in glioma have revealed significant limitations in the end points used. This requires a critical and comprehensive review of how brain tumor trials are conducted, particularly of which end points are defined and how response and progression are defined.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Stummer, W., Pichlmeier, U., Meinel, T., Wiestler, O. D., Zanella, F., & Reulen, H.-J. (2006) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(06)70665-9 · Cited by 3,423
Response criteria for phase II studies of supratentorial malignant glioma.
Macdonald, D. R., Cascino, T. L., Schold, S. C., & Cairncross, J. G. (1990) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.1990.8.7.1277 · Cited by 2,409
Self-citationOutcomes and Prognostic Factors in Recurrent Glioma Patients Enrolled Onto Phase II Clinical Trials
Wong, E. T., Hess, K. R., Gleason, M. J., Jaeckle, K. A., Kyritsis, A. P., Prados, M. D., Levin, V. A., & Yung, W. K. A. (1999) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.1999.17.8.2572 · Cited by 902
Cited by
Jakola, A. S., Myrmel, K. S., Kloster, R., Torp, S. H., Lindal, S., Unsgård, G., & Solheim, O. (2012) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2012.12807 · Cited by 641
Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Clinical Trials
Wen, P. Y., Chang, S. M., Van den Bent, M. J., Vogelbaum, M. A., Macdonald, D. R., & Lee, E. Q. (2017) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2017.72.7511 · Cited by 435
Self-citationLu-Emerson, C., Duda, D. G., Emblem, K. E., Taylor, J. W., Gerstner, E. R., Loeffler, J. S., Batchelor, T. T., & Jain, R. K. (2015) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2014.55.9575 · Cited by 179
Boxerman, J. L., Zhang, Z., Safriel, Y., Rogg, J. M., Wolf, R. L., Mohan, S., Marques, H., Sorensen, A. G., Gilbert, M. R., & Barboriak, D. P. (2018) · Neuro-Oncology · doi:10.1093/neuonc/noy049 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- van den Bent, M. J., Vogelbaum, M. A., Wen, P. Y., Macdonald, D. R., & Chang, S. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2009-06-20
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 2905-2908
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2142312148
- Cited by
- 240
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 13.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: End Point Assessment in Gliomas: Novel Treatments Limit Usefulness of Classical Macdonald's Criteria. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2009.22.4998
- The paper
- van den Bent, M. J., Vogelbaum, M. A., Wen, P. Y., Macdonald, D. R., & Chang, S. M. (2009). End Point Assessment in Gliomas: Novel Treatments Limit Usefulness of Classical Macdonald's Criteria. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2009.22.4998
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
