Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 540

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Primary Disseminated Multifocal Ewing Sarcoma: Results of the Euro-EWING 99 Trial

Open access
Ladenstein, Ruth, Pötschger, Ulrike, Le Deley, Marie Cécile, Whelan, Jeremy, Paulussen, Michael, Oberlin, Odile, van den Berg, Henk, Dirksen, Uta, Hjorth, Lars, Michon, Jean, Lewis, Ian, Craft, Alan, Jürgens, Heribert·2010·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: To improve the poor prognosis of patients with primary disseminated multifocal Ewing sarcomas (PDMES) with a dose-intense treatment concept. Patients and Methods: From 1999 to 2005, 281 patients with PDMES were enrolled onto the Euro-EWING 99 R3 study. Median age was 16.2 years (range, 0.4 to 49 years). Recommended treatment consisted of six cycles of vincristine, ifosfamide, doxorubicin, and etoposide (VIDE), one cycle of vincristine, dactinomycin, and ifosfamide (VAI), local treatment (surgery and/or radiotherapy), and high-dose busulfan-melphalan followed by autologous stem-cell transplantation (HDT/SCT). Results: After a median follow-up of 3.8 years, event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) at 3 years for all 281 patients were 27% ± 3% and 34% ± 4% respectively. Six VIDE cycles were completed by 250 patients (89%); 169 patients (60%) received HDT/SCT. The estimated 3-year EFS from the start of HDT/SCT was 45% for 46 children younger than 14 years. Cox regression analyses demonstrated increased risk at diagnosis for patients older than 14 years (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.6), a primary tumor volume more than 200 mL (HR = 1.8), more than one bone metastatic site (HR = 2.0), bone marrow metastases (HR = 1.6), and additional lung metastases (HR = 1.5). An up-front risk score based on these HR factors identified three groups with EFS rates of 50% for score ≤ 3 (82 patients), 25% for score more than 3 to less than 5 (102 patients), and 10% for score ≥ 5 (70 patients; P < .0001). Conclusion: PDMES patients may survive with intensive multimodal therapy. Age, tumor volume, and extent of metastatic spread are relevant risk factors. A score based on these factors may facilitate risk-adapted treatment approaches.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2009.22.9864

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 540

Metadata

Authors
Ladenstein, R., Pötschger, U., Le Deley, M. C., Whelan, J., Paulussen, M., Oberlin, O., van den Berg, H., Dirksen, U., Hjorth, L., Michon, J., Lewis, I., Craft, A., & Jürgens, H.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2010-07-10
Volume
28
Issue
20
Pages
3284-3291
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2042936828
Cited by
540
References
0
FWCI
19.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Primary Disseminated Multifocal Ewing Sarcoma: Results of the Euro-EWING 99 Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2009.22.9864
The paper
Ladenstein, R., Pötschger, U., Le Deley, M. C., Whelan, J., Paulussen, M., Oberlin, O., van den Berg, H., Dirksen, U., Hjorth, L., Michon, J., Lewis, I., Craft, A., & Jürgens, H. (2010). Primary Disseminated Multifocal Ewing Sarcoma: Results of the Euro-EWING 99 Trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2009.22.9864

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.