Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 171

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Randomized Phase III Trial of Platinum-Doublet Chemotherapy Followed by Gefitinib Compared With Continued Platinum-Doublet Chemotherapy in Japanese Patients With Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Results of a West Japan Thoracic Oncology Group Trial (WJTOG0203)

Open access
Takeda, Koji, Hida, Toyoaki, Sato, Tosiya, Ando, Masahiko, Seto, Takashi, Satouchi, Miyako, Ichinose, Yukito, Katakami, Nobuyuki, Yamamoto, Nobuyuki, Kudoh, Shinzoh, Sasaki, Jiichiro, Matsui, Kaoru, Takayama, Koichi, Kashii, Tatsuhiko, Iwamoto, Yasuo, Sawa, Toshiyuki, Okamoto, Isamu, Kurata, Takayasu, Nakagawa, Kazuhiko, Fukuoka, Masahiro·2010·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: Gefitinib is a small molecule inhibitor of the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase. We conducted a phase III trial to evaluate whether gefitinib improves survival as sequential therapy after platinum-doublet chemotherapy in patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients and Methods: Chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced stage (IIIB/IV) NSCLC, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 1, and adequate organ function were randomly assigned to either platinum-doublet chemotherapy up to six cycles (arm A) or platinum-doublet chemotherapy for three cycles followed by gefitinib 250 mg orally once daily, until disease progression (arm B). Patients were stratified by disease stage, sex, histology, and chemotherapy regimens. The primary end point was overall survival; secondary end points included progression-free survival, tumor response, safety, and quality of life. Results: Between March 2003 and May 2005, 604 patients were randomly assigned. There was a statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival in arm B (hazard ratio [HR], 0.68; 95% CI, 0.57 to 0.80; P < .001); however, overall survival results did not reach statistical significance (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.72 to 1.03; P = .11). In an exploratory subset analysis of overall survival by histologic group, patients in arm B with adenocarcinoma did significantly better than patients in arm A with adenocarcinoma (n = 467; HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.65 to 0.98; P = .03). Conclusion: This trial failed to meet the primary end point of OS in patients with NSCLC. The exploratory subset analyses demonstrate a possible survival prolongation for sequential therapy of gefitinib, especially for patients with adenocarcinoma.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2009.23.3445

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 171

Metadata

Authors
Takeda, K., Hida, T., Sato, T., Ando, M., Seto, T., Satouchi, M., Ichinose, Y., Katakami, N., Yamamoto, N., Kudoh, S., Sasaki, J., Matsui, K., Takayama, K., Kashii, T., Iwamoto, Y., Sawa, T., Okamoto, I., Kurata, T., Nakagawa, K., & Fukuoka, M.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2010-02-10
Volume
28
Issue
5
Pages
753-760
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2161167330
Cited by
171
References
3
FWCI
19.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Randomized Phase III Trial of Platinum-Doublet Chemotherapy Followed by Gefitinib Compared With Continued Platinum-Doublet Chemotherapy in Japanese Patients With Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Results of a West Japan Thoracic Oncology Group Trial (WJTOG0203). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2009.23.3445
The paper
Takeda, K., Hida, T., Sato, T., Ando, M., Seto, T., Satouchi, M., Ichinose, Y., Katakami, N., Yamamoto, N., Kudoh, S., Sasaki, J., Matsui, K., Takayama, K., Kashii, T., Iwamoto, Y., Sawa, T., Okamoto, I., Kurata, T., Nakagawa, K., & Fukuoka, M. (2010). Randomized Phase III Trial of Platinum-Doublet Chemotherapy Followed by Gefitinib Compared With Continued Platinum-Doublet Chemotherapy in Japanese Patients With Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Results of a West Japan Thoracic Oncology Group Trial (WJTOG0203). Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2009.23.3445

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.