Cited by 71Lung Cancer Treatments and MutationsLung Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentLung Cancer Research Studies

Maintenance Therapy With Continuous or Switch Strategy in Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Zhang, Xinji, Zang, Jiajie, Xu, Jinfang, Bai, Chong, Qin, Yingyi, Liu, Ke, Wu, Cheng, Wu, Meijing +4 more·2011·Chest

Abstract

Background Maintenance therapy for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has gained extensive interest. Varying results for this treatment underpin the need for a synthesis of evidence.Methods Trials investigating maintenance therapy with either a continuous or a switch strategy for patients with nonprogressing NSCLC compared with placebo or observation were identified. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS), and secondary outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS) and toxicity.Results Eight trials of 3,736 patients were included in the analysis. Switch maintenance therapy substantially improved OS compared with placebo or observation (hazard ratio [HR], 0.85; 95% CI, 0.79-0.92; P < .001). A similar trend of improved OS was found in continuous maintenance therapy, despite lacking statistical significance (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.74-1.04; P = .124). The interaction test suggested that the difference in OS between the two maintenance strategies was not statistically significant (P = .777). Clinically substantial and statistically significant improvement in PFS was found with both maintenance strategies (switch maintenance therapy HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.57-0.78; continuous maintenance therapy HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.43-0.65; interaction P = .128). Subgroup analyses revealed no statistically significant differences in OS or PFS between switch maintenance therapy with cytotoxic agents and that with tyrosine kinase inhibitor agents. Toxicity was greater in maintenance therapy.Conclusions Maintenance therapy with either a continuous or a switch strategy significantly increases OS and PFS compared with placebo or observation. However, the benefits must be balanced against toxicity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1378/chest.10-2745

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, X., Zang, J., Xu, J., Bai, C., Qin, Y., Liu, K., Wu, C., Wu, M., He, Q., Zhang, S., Wei, L., & He, J.
Affiliations
Second Military Medical University (CN)
Corresponding author
He, Jia
Venue
Chest
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-07
Volume
140
Issue
1
Pages
117-126
ISSN
0012-3692 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2099904227
Cited by
71
References
33
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 15
FWCI
2.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • CHEST Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Lung Cancer Research Studies
Keywords
maintenance therapy, non-small cell lung cancer, overall survival, progression-free survival, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, cytotoxic drugs, treatment toxicity
MeSH terms
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, China, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Survival Rate, Treatment Outcome, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Disease-Free Survival, Protein Kinase Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review