The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Randomized Phase III Trial of Ixabepilone Plus Capecitabine Versus Capecitabine in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer Previously Treated With an Anthracycline and a Taxane
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: We sought to determine whether the combination of ixabepilone plus capecitabine improved overall survival (OS) compared with capecitabine alone in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) previously treated with anthracyclines and taxanes. Patients and Methods: A total of 1,221 patients with MBC previously treated with anthracycline and taxanes were randomly assigned to ixabepilone (40 mg/m 2 intravenously on day 1) plus capecitabine (2,000 mg/m 2 orally on days 1 through 14) or capecitabine alone (2,500 mg/m 2 on the same schedule) given every 21 days. The trial was powered to detect a 20% reduction in the hazard ratio (HR) for death. Results: There was no significant difference in OS between the combination and capecitabine monotherapy arm, the primary end point (median, 16.4 v 15.6 months; HR = 0.9; 95% CI, 078 to 1.03; P = .1162). The arms were well balanced with the exception of a higher prevalence of impaired performance status (Karnofsky performance status 70% to 80%) in the combination arm (32% v 25%). In a secondary Cox regression analysis adjusted for performance status and other prognostic factors, OS was improved for the combination (HR = 0.85; 95% CI, 0.75 to 0.98; P = .0231). In 79% of patients with measurable disease, the combination significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS; median, 6.2 v 4.2 months; HR = 0.79; P = .0005) and response rate (43% v 29%; P < .0001). Grade 3 to 4 neuropathy occurred in 24% treated with the combination, but was reversible. Conclusion: This study confirmed a previous trial demonstrating improved PFS and response for the ixabepilone-capecitabine combination compared with capecitabine alone, although this did not result in improved survival.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Triple-negative breast cancer: challenges and opportunities of a heterogeneous disease
Bianchini, G., Balko, J. M., Mayer, I. A., Sanders, M. E., & Gianni, L. (2016) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2016.66 · Cited by 3,079
Cortes, J., O'Shaughnessy, J., Loesch, D., Blum, J. L., Vahdat, L. T., Petrakova, K., Chollet, P., Manikas, A., Diéras, V., Delozier, T., et al. (2011) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(11)60070-6 · Cited by 1,094
Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in adults: a comprehensive update of the literature
Argyriou, A., Kyritsis, A., Makatsoris, T., & Kalofonos, H. (2014) · Cancer Management and Research · doi:10.2147/cmar.s44261 · Cited by 273
Andreopoulou, E., & Sparano, J. A. (2013) · Current Breast Cancer Reports · doi:10.1007/s12609-012-0097-1 · Cited by 65
Self-citationCao, D.-S., Jiang, S.-L., Guan, Y.-D., Chen, X.-S., Zhang, L.-X., Zhang, Y., Chen, A. F., Yang, J.-M., & Cheng, Y. (2020) · European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2020.112421 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Sparano, J. A., Vrdoljak, E., Rixe, O., Xu, B., Manikhas, A., Medina, C., Ventilari Da Costa, S. C., Ro, J., Rubio, G., Rondinon, M., Perez Manga, G., Peck, R., Poulart, V., & Conte, P.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2010-07-10
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 3256-3263
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2150296977
- Cited by
- 218
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Randomized Phase III Trial of Ixabepilone Plus Capecitabine Versus Capecitabine in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer Previously Treated With an Anthracycline and a Taxane. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2009.24.4244
- The paper
- Sparano, J. A., Vrdoljak, E., Rixe, O., Xu, B., Manikhas, A., Medina, C., Ventilari Da Costa, S. C., Ro, J., Rubio, G., Rondinon, M., Perez Manga, G., Peck, R., Poulart, V., & Conte, P. (2010). Randomized Phase III Trial of Ixabepilone Plus Capecitabine Versus Capecitabine in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer Previously Treated With an Anthracycline and a Taxane. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2009.24.4244
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.