Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,878

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Meta-Analysis of Concomitant Versus Sequential Radiochemotherapy in Locally Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Open access
Aupérin, Anne, Le Péchoux, Cecile, Rolland, Estelle, Curran, Walter J., Furuse, Kiyoyuki, Fournel, Pierre, Belderbos, Jose, Clamon, Gerald, Ulutin, Hakki Cuneyt, Paulus, Rebecca, Yamanaka, Takeharu, Bozonnat, Marie-Cecile, Uitterhoeve, Apollonia, Wang, Xiaofei, Stewart, Lesley, Arriagada, Rodrigo, Burdett, Sarah, Pignon, Jean-Pierre·2010·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: The previous individual patient data meta-analyses of chemotherapy in locally advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) showed that adding sequential or concomitant chemotherapy to radiotherapy improved survival. The NSCLC Collaborative Group performed a meta-analysis of randomized trials directly comparing concomitant versus sequential radiochemotherapy. Methods: Systematic searches for trials were undertaken, followed by central collection, checking, and reanalysis of updated individual patient data. Results from trials were combined using the stratified log-rank test to calculate pooled hazard ratios (HRs). The primary outcome was overall survival; secondary outcomes were progression-free survival, cumulative incidences of locoregional and distant progression, and acute toxicity. Results: Of seven eligible trials, data from six trials were received (1,205 patients, 92% of all randomly assigned patients). Median follow-up was 6 years. There was a significant benefit of concomitant radiochemotherapy on overall survival (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.74 to 0.95; P = .004), with an absolute benefit of 5.7% (from 18.1% to 23.8%) at 3 years and 4.5% at 5 years. For progression-free survival, the HR was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.79 to 1.01; P = .07). Concomitant treatment decreased locoregional progression (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.62 to 0.95; P = .01); its effect was not different from that of sequential treatment on distant progression (HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.86 to 1.25; P = .69). Concomitant radiochemotherapy increased acute esophageal toxicity (grade 3-4) from 4% to 18% with a relative risk of 4.9 (95% CI, 3.1 to 7.8; P < .001). There was no significant difference regarding acute pulmonary toxicity. Conclusion: Concomitant radiochemotherapy, as compared with sequential radiochemotherapy, improved survival of patients with locally advanced NSCLC, primarily because of a better locoregional control, but at the cost of manageable increased acute esophageal toxicity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2009.26.2543

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 1,878

Metadata

Authors
Aupérin, A., Le Péchoux, C., Rolland, E., Curran, W. J., Furuse, K., Fournel, P., Belderbos, J., Clamon, G., Ulutin, H. C., Paulus, R., Yamanaka, T., Bozonnat, M.-C., Uitterhoeve, A., Wang, X., Stewart, L., Arriagada, R., Burdett, S., & Pignon, J.-P.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2010-05-01
Volume
28
Issue
13
Pages
2181-2190
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2104701073
Cited by
1,878
References
2
FWCI
12.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Meta-Analysis of Concomitant Versus Sequential Radiochemotherapy in Locally Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2009.26.2543
The paper
Aupérin, A., Le Péchoux, C., Rolland, E., Curran, W. J., Furuse, K., Fournel, P., Belderbos, J., Clamon, G., Ulutin, H. C., Paulus, R., Yamanaka, T., Bozonnat, M.-C., Uitterhoeve, A., Wang, X., Stewart, L., Arriagada, R., Burdett, S., & Pignon, J.-P. (2010). Meta-Analysis of Concomitant Versus Sequential Radiochemotherapy in Locally Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2009.26.2543

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.