The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Phase II, Open-Label Study of Pazopanib or Lapatinib Monotherapy Compared With Pazopanib Plus Lapatinib Combination Therapy in Patients With Advanced and Recurrent Cervical Cancer
Abstract
Purpose: Pazopanib and lapatinib are tyrosine kinase inhibitors that target vascular endothelial growth factor receptor, platelet-derived growth factor receptor, and c-Kit or epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2/neu), respectively. In cervical cancer, EGFR and HER2/neu overexpression and high microvascular density correlate with survival. Patients and Methods: Patients with measurable stage IVB persistent/recurrent cervical carcinoma not amenable to curative therapy and at least one prior regimen in the metastatic setting were randomly assigned in a ratio of 1:1:1 to pazopanib at 800 mg once daily, lapatinib at 1,500 mg once daily, or lapatinib plus pazopanib combination therapy (lapatinib at 1,000 mg plus pazopanib at 400 mg once daily or lapatinib at 1,500 mg plus pazopanib at 800 mg once daily). Therapy continued until progression or withdrawal because of adverse events (AEs). Primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS), and secondary end points were overall survival (OS), response rate (RR), and safety. The futility boundary was crossed at the planned interim analysis for combination therapy compared with lapatinib therapy, and the combination was discontinued. Results: Of 230 patients enrolled, 152 were randomly assigned to the monotherapy arms: pazopanib (n = 74) or lapatinib (n = 78). Most patients (62%) had recurrent cancer. Pazopanib improved PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.66; 90% CI, 0.48 to 0.91; P = .013) and OS (HR, 0.67; 90% CI, 0.46 to 0.99; P = .045). Median OS was 50.7 weeks and 39.1 weeks and RRs were 9% and 5% for pazopanib and lapatinib, respectively. The only grade 3 AE > 10% was diarrhea (11% pazopanib and 13% lapatinib). Grade 4 AEs were 9% (lapatinib) and 12% (pazopanib). Conclusion: This study confirms the activity of antiangiogenesis agents in advanced and recurrent cervical cancer and demonstrates the benefit of pazopanib based on the prolonged PFS and favorable toxicity profile.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations
Kaplan, E. L., & Meier, P. (1992) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4380-9_25 · Cited by 45,181
Regression Models and Life-Tables
Cox, D. R. (1972) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1972.tb00899.x · Cited by 39,793
Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations
Kaplan, E. L., & Meier, P. (1958) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1958.10501452 · Cited by 39,158
Regression Models and Life-Tables
Cox, D. R. (1992) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4380-9_37 · Cited by 26,297
New Guidelines to Evaluate the Response to Treatment in Solid Tumors
Therasse, P., Arbuck, S. G., Eisenhauer, E. A., Wanders, J., Kaplan, R. S., Rubinstein, L., Verweij, J., Van Glabbeke, M., van Oosterom, A. T., Christian, M. C., et al. (2000) · JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/92.3.205 · Cited by 15,660
Chemotherapy, Bevacizumab, and Cetuximab in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Tol, J., Koopman, M., Cats, A., Rodenburg, C. J., Creemers, G. J. M., Schrama, J. G., Erdkamp, F. L. G., Vos, A. H., van Groeningen, C. J., Sinnige, H. A. M., et al. (2009) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0808268 · Cited by 1,341
Ross, J. S., Slodkowska, E. A., Symmans, W. F., Pusztai, L., Ravdin, P. M., & Hortobagyi, G. N. (2009) · The Oncologist · doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2008-0230 · Cited by 1,144
Cameron, D., Casey, M., Press, M., Lindquist, D., Pienkowski, T., Romieu, C. G., Chan, S., Jagiello-Gruszfeld, A., Kaufman, B., Crown, J., et al. (2008) · Breast Cancer Research and Treatment · doi:10.1007/s10549-007-9885-0 · Cited by 794
Monk, B. J., Sill, M. W., McMeekin, D. S., Cohn, D. E., Ramondetta, L. M., Boardman, C. H., Benda, J., & Cella, D. (2009) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2009.21.8909 · Cited by 693
Self-citationDi Leo, A., Gomez, H. L., Aziz, Z., Zvirbule, Z., Bines, J., Arbushites, M. C., Guerrera, S. F., Koehler, M., Oliva, C., Stein, S. H., et al. (2008) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2008.16.2578 · Cited by 418
Cited by
Cervical cancer therapies: Current challenges and future perspectives
Burmeister, C. A., Khan, S. F., Schäfer, G., Mbatani, N., Adams, T., Moodley, J., & Prince, S. (2022) · Tumour Virus Research · doi:10.1016/j.tvr.2022.200238 · Cited by 474
Pembrolizumab for advanced cervical cancer: Safety and efficacy
De Felice, F., Giudice, E., Bolomini, G., Distefano, M. G., Scambia, G., Fagotti, A., & Marchetti, C. (2021) · Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy · doi:10.1080/14737140.2021.1850279 · Cited by 30
Xia, X., Jiang, W., Qi, W., Hong, B., & Zhao, W. (2020) · Oncology Research and Treatment · doi:10.1159/000510355 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Monk, B. J., Mas Lopez, L., Zarba, J. J., Oaknin, A., Tarpin, C., Termrungruanglert, W., Alber, J. A., Ding, J., Stutts, M. W., & Pandite, L. N.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2010-08-01
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 3562-3569
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2170781431
- Cited by
- 264
- References
- 24
- FWCI
- 20.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phase II, Open-Label Study of Pazopanib or Lapatinib Monotherapy Compared With Pazopanib Plus Lapatinib Combination Therapy in Patients With Advanced and Recurrent Cervical Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2009.26.9571
- The paper
- Monk, B. J., Mas Lopez, L., Zarba, J. J., Oaknin, A., Tarpin, C., Termrungruanglert, W., Alber, J. A., Ding, J., Stutts, M. W., & Pandite, L. N. (2010). Phase II, Open-Label Study of Pazopanib or Lapatinib Monotherapy Compared With Pazopanib Plus Lapatinib Combination Therapy in Patients With Advanced and Recurrent Cervical Cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2009.26.9571
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.