The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Clinical Relevance of Microsatellite Instability in Colorectal Cancer
Open accessAbstract
Microsatellite instability (MSI) is a clonal change in the number of repeated DNA nucleotide units in microsatellites. It arises in tumors with deficient mismatch repair due to the inactivation of one of the four mismatch repair genes: MSH2, MLH1, MSH6, and PMS2. In order to determine the MSI status of a tumor, microdissection and polymerase chain reaction–based detection strategies are required. For practical purposes, MSI is equivalent to the loss of staining by immunohistochemistry (IHC) of one of the mismatch repair genes since both signify an abnormality in mismatch repair. Of all colorectal cancers (CRCs), 15% to 20% display MSI or abnormal IHC (often referred to as microsatellite instability [MIN] pathway). The remaining 80% to 85% of CRCs are microsatellite stable but most are characterized by chromosomal instability (CIN pathway). Almost all Lynch syndrome tumors have MSI or abnormal IHC and they account for up to one third of all MIN CRCs (3% to 5% of all CRCs). The remaining MIN tumors are sporadic as a result of somatic inactivation of the MLH1 gene caused by methylation of its promoter. Thus, the presence of a MSI/IHC abnormality prompts further investigations to diagnose Lynch syndrome, whereas its absence excludes Lynch syndrome. We recommend screening all CRC tumors for IHC or MSI. MIN tumors have a more favorable outcome than CIN tumors, and fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy does not improve the outcome of stage II or stage III MIN tumors. More data are needed to determine how best to treat patients with stage II and stage III MIN CRCs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ribic, C. M., Sargent, D. J., Moore, M. J., Thibodeau, S. N., French, A. J., Goldberg, R. M., Hamilton, S. R., Laurent-Puig, P., Gryfe, R., Shepherd, L. E., et al. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa022289 · Cited by 2,160
Arnold, C. N., Goel, A., & Boland, C. R. (2003) · International Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1002/ijc.11176 · Cited by 280
Cited by
Microsatellite Instability in Colorectal Cancer
Boland, C. R., & Goel, A. (2010) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2009.12.064 · Cited by 2,456
Classification and characterization of microsatellite instability across 18 cancer types
Hause, R. J., Pritchard, C. C., Shendure, J., & Salipante, S. J. (2016) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.4191 · Cited by 991
Drug resistance and new therapies in colorectal cancer
Jeught, K. V. D., Xu, H.-C., Li, Y.-J., Lu, X.-B., & Ji, G. (2018) · World Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.3748/wjg.v24.i34.3834 · Cited by 597
Colorectal Cancer: Epidemiology, Disease Mechanisms and Interventions to Reduce Onset and Mortality
Aran, V., Victorino, A. P., Thuler, L. C., & Ferreira, C. G. (2016) · Clinical Colorectal Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.clcc.2016.02.008 · Cited by 365
Protein neddylation and its role in health and diseases
Zhang, S., Yu, Q., Li, Z., Zhao, Y., & Sun, Y. (2024) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-024-01800-9 · Cited by 171
Metadata
- Authors
- de la Chapelle, A., & Hampel, H.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2010-07-10
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 3380-3387
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2124581351
- Cited by
- 332
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 13.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical Relevance of Microsatellite Instability in Colorectal Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2009.27.0652
- The paper
- de la Chapelle, A., & Hampel, H. (2010). Clinical Relevance of Microsatellite Instability in Colorectal Cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2009.27.0652
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.