Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 424

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Bortezomib Plus Dexamethasone Induction Improves Outcome of Patients With t(4;14) Myeloma but Not Outcome of Patients With del(17p)

Open access
Avet-Loiseau, Hervé, Leleu, Xavier, Roussel, Murielle, Moreau, Philippe, Guerin-Charbonnel, Catherine, Caillot, Denis, Marit, Gérald, Benboubker, Lotfi, Voillat, Laurent, Mathiot, Claire, Kolb, Brigitte, Macro, Margaret, Campion, Loïc, Wetterwald, Marc, Stoppa, Anne-Marie, Hulin, Cyrille, Facon, Thierry, Attal, Michel, Minvielle, Stéphane, Harousseau, Jean-Luc·2010·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: Cytogenetics is an important prognostic parameter in multiple myeloma (MM). Patients presenting with either t(4;14) or del(17p) are known to have a short event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS). Some preliminary data suggest that bortezomib is able to overcome these prognostic parameters. Patients and Methods: A series of 507 patients with newly diagnosed MM who received four cycles of bortezomib-dexamethasone induction therapy before high-dose melphalan were analyzed for both t(4;14) and del(17p). Results: We found that both t(4;14) and del(17p) remain prognostic parameters, even in the context of bortezomib treatment. However, it is important to note that bortezomib significantly improves the prognosis (in terms of both EFS and OS) of patients with t(4;14), compared with patients treated with vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone induction therapy. In contrast, no improvement was observed for del(17p) patients. Conclusion: Short-term bortezomib induction improves outcome of patients with t(4;14) but not the outcome of patients with del(17p). However, both abnormalities remain prognostic factors predicting both EFS and OS despite bortezomib induction.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2010.28.3945

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 424

Metadata

Authors
Avet-Loiseau, H., Leleu, X., Roussel, M., Moreau, P., Guerin-Charbonnel, C., Caillot, D., Marit, G., Benboubker, L., Voillat, L., Mathiot, C., Kolb, B., Macro, M., Campion, L., Wetterwald, M., Stoppa, A.-M., Hulin, C., Facon, T., Attal, M., Minvielle, S., & Harousseau, J.-L.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2010-10-20
Volume
28
Issue
30
Pages
4630-4634
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2126351771
Cited by
424
References
1
FWCI
27.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bortezomib Plus Dexamethasone Induction Improves Outcome of Patients With t(4;14) Myeloma but Not Outcome of Patients With del(17p). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2010.28.3945
The paper
Avet-Loiseau, H., Leleu, X., Roussel, M., Moreau, P., Guerin-Charbonnel, C., Caillot, D., Marit, G., Benboubker, L., Voillat, L., Mathiot, C., Kolb, B., Macro, M., Campion, L., Wetterwald, M., Stoppa, A.-M., Hulin, C., Facon, T., Attal, M., Minvielle, S., & Harousseau, J.-L. (2010). Bortezomib Plus Dexamethasone Induction Improves Outcome of Patients With t(4;14) Myeloma but Not Outcome of Patients With del(17p). Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2010.28.3945

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.