Cited by 1,899Multiple Myeloma Research and TreatmentsBone health and treatmentsMultiple Sclerosis Research Studies

Bortezomib plus Melphalan and Prednisone for Initial Treatment of Multiple Myeloma

Open access
San Miguel, Jesús F., Schlag, Rudolf, Khuageva, Nuriet K., Dimopoulos, Meletios A., Shpilberg, Ofer, Kropff, Martin, Spicka, Ivan, Petrucci, Maria T. +13 more·2008·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The standard treatment for patients with multiple myeloma who are not candidates for high-dose therapy is melphalan and prednisone. This phase 3 study compared the use of melphalan and prednisone with or without bortezomib in previously untreated patients with multiple myeloma who were ineligible for high-dose therapy. METHODS: We randomly assigned 682 patients to receive nine 6-week cycles of melphalan (at a dose of 9 mg per square meter of body-surface area) and prednisone (at a dose of 60 mg per square meter) on days 1 to 4, either alone or with bortezomib (at a dose of 1.3 mg per square meter) on days 1, 4, 8, 11, 22, 25, 29, and 32 during cycles 1 to 4 and on days 1, 8, 22, and 29 during cycles 5 to 9. The primary end point was the time to disease progression. RESULTS: The time to progression among patients receiving bortezomib plus melphalan-prednisone (bortezomib group) was 24.0 months, as compared with 16.6 months among those receiving melphalan-prednisone alone (control group) (hazard ratio for the bortezomib group, 0.48; P<0.001). The proportions of patients with a partial response or better were 71% in the bortezomib group and 35% in the control group; complete-response rates were 30% and 4%, respectively (P<0.001). The median duration of the response was 19.9 months in the bortezomib group and 13.1 months in the control group. The hazard ratio for overall survival was 0.61 for the bortezomib group (P=0.008). Adverse events were consistent with established profiles of toxic events associated with bortezomib and melphalan-prednisone. Grade 3 events occurred in a higher proportion of patients in the bortezomib group than in the control group (53% vs. 44%, P=0.02), but there were no significant differences in grade 4 events (28% and 27%, respectively) or treatment-related deaths (1% and 2%). CONCLUSIONS: Bortezomib plus melphalan-prednisone was superior to melphalan-prednisone alone in patients with newly diagnosed myeloma who were ineligible for high-dose therapy. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00111319.)

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa0801479

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is weak data suggesting that use of a proteasome inhibitor may abrogate the prognostic impact of at least some high-risk genetic markers.

    “Albeit weak, there is data suggesting that use of a proteasome inhibitor may abrogate the prognostic impact of at least some of these high-risk genetic markers [32].”

    From Epidemiology, Staging, and Management of Multiple Myeloma (2021) · cites this paper as [32]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
San Miguel, J. F., Schlag, R., Khuageva, N. K., Dimopoulos, M. A., Shpilberg, O., Kropff, M., Spicka, I., Petrucci, M. T., Palumbo, A., Samoilova, O. S., Dmoszynska, A., Abdulkadyrov, K. M., Schots, R., Jiang, B., Mateos, M.-V., Anderson, K. C., Esseltine, D. L., Liu, K., Cakana, A., van de Velde, H., & Richardson, P. G.
Affiliations
  • Belgian Hematological Society (BE)
  • Botkin Hospital (RU)
  • National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR)
  • Rabin Medical Center (IL)
  • University of Münster (DE)
  • Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
  • University of Turin (IT)
  • Nizhny Novgorod Regional Clinical Hospital named after Semashko (RU)
  • Russian Research Institute of Hematology and Transfusiology (RU)
  • Peking University (CN)
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US)
  • Takeda Oncology (United States) (US)
  • Johnson & Johnson (United States) (US)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2008-08-28
Volume
359
Issue
9
Pages
906-917
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2096207943
Cited by
1,899
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 63 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 83 · 2020: 90 · 2019: 91 · 2018: 94 · 2017: 118 · 2016: 115 · 2015: 132 · 2014: 144 · 2013: 164 · 2012: 172
FWCI
108.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Hispana (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
  • DIAL (Catholic University of Leuven) (submittedVersion)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Gredos (University of Salamanca) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
  • VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • American Society of Hematology
  • Celgene
  • Takeda Oncology
  • Cilag
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Bone health and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
Keywords
multiple myeloma, bortezomib, melphalan, prednisone, combination chemotherapy, treatment-naive patients, time to progression, overall survival, complete response, adverse events, proteasome inhibitors, treatment response duration, non-relapse mortality, neuropathy, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia
MeSH terms
Bortezomib, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Boronic Acids, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Melphalan, Middle Aged, Multiple Myeloma, Prednisone, Pyrazines, Time Factors, Survival Analysis, Treatment Outcome, Disease Progression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review