Cited by 318Neuroblastoma Research and TreatmentsNeurofibromatosis and Schwannoma CasesGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment

Clinical and Biologic Features Predictive of Survival After Relapse of Neuroblastoma: A Report From the International Neuroblastoma Risk Group Project

Open access
London, Wendy B., Castel, Victoria, Monclair, Tom, Ambros, Peter F., Pearson, Andrew D.J., Cohn, Susan L., Berthold, Frank, Nakagawara, Akira +3 more·2011·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: Survival after neuroblastoma relapse is poor. Understanding the relationship between clinical and biologic features and outcome after relapse may help in selection of optimal therapy. Our aim was to determine which factors were significantly predictive of postrelapse overall survival (OS) in patients with recurrent neuroblastoma—particularly whether time from diagnosis to first relapse (TTFR) was a significant predictor of OS. Patients and Methods: Patients with first relapse/progression were identified in the International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) database. Time from study enrollment until first event and OS time starting from first event were calculated. Cox regression models were used to calculate the hazard ratio of increased death risk and perform survival tree regression. TTFR was tested in a multivariable Cox model with other factors. Results: In the INRG database (N = 8,800), 2,266 patients experienced first progression/relapse. Median time to relapse was 13.2 months (range, 1 day to 11.4 years). Five-year OS from time of first event was 20% (SE, ± 1%). TTFR was statistically significantly associated with OS time in a nonlinear relationship; patients with TTFR of 36 months or longer had the lowest risk of death, followed by patients who relapsed in the period of 0 to less than 6 months or 18 to 36 months. Patients who relapsed between 6 and 18 months after diagnosis had the highest risk of death. TTFR, age, International Neuroblastoma Staging System stage, and MYCN copy number status were independently predictive of postrelapse OS in multivariable analysis. Conclusion: Age, stage, MYCN status, and TTFR are significant prognostic factors for postrelapse survival and may help in the design of clinical trials evaluating novel agents.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2010.34.3392

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [21]George RE, Variend S, Cullinane C, et al. Relationship between histopathological features, MYCN amplification, and prognosis: A UKCCSG study United Kingdom Children Cancer Study Group. Med Pediatr Oncol. 2001;36:169–176. doi: 10.1002/1096-911X(20010101)36:1<169::AID-MPO1041>3.0.CO;2-U. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  2. [24]Simon T, Berthold F, Klingenbiel T, et al. Do relapsed high risk neuroblastoma patients have a second chance. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2009;53(5):736. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
London, W. B., Castel, V., Monclair, T., Ambros, P. F., Pearson, A. D. J., Cohn, S. L., Berthold, F., Nakagawara, A., Ladenstein, R. L., Iehara, T., & Matthay, K. K.
Affiliations
Oslo University Hospital (NO)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2011-08-20
Volume
29
Issue
24
Pages
3286-3292
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2110788947
Cited by
318
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 11
FWCI
8.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Dougherty Foundation
  • William Guy Forbeck Research Foundation
  • Generalitat Valenciana
  • U.S. Public Health Service (P01 81403)
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (21390317)
  • National Cancer Institute
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neuroblastoma Research and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurofibromatosis and Schwannoma Cases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
neuroblastoma, relapse, prognostic factors, time to relapse, INSS, patient age
MeSH terms
N-Myc Proto-Oncogene Protein, Age Factors, Humans, Infant, Neoplasm Staging, Neuroblastoma, Nuclear Proteins, Prognosis, Recurrence, Oncogene Proteins, Thymopentin, DNA Copy Number Variations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review