Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,059

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Antiemetics: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update

Open access
Basch, Ethan, Prestrud, Ann Alexis, Hesketh, Paul J., Kris, Mark G., Feyer, Petra C., Somerfield, Mark R., Chesney, Maurice, Clark-Snow, Rebecca Anne, Flaherty, Anne Marie, Freundlich, Barbara, Morrow, Gary, Rao, Kamakshi V., Schwartz,, Rowena N., Lyman, Gary H.·2011·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: To update the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) guideline for antiemetics in oncology. Methods: A systematic review of the medical literature was completed to inform this update. MEDLINE, the Cochrane Collaboration Library, and meeting materials from ASCO and the Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer were all searched. Primary outcomes of interest were complete response and rates of any vomiting or nausea. Results: Thirty-seven trials met prespecified inclusion and exclusion criteria for this systematic review. Two systematic reviews from the Cochrane Collaboration were identified; one surveyed the pediatric literature. The other compared the relative efficacy of the 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 (5-HT 3 ) receptor antagonists. Recommendations: Combined anthracycline and cyclophosphamide regimens were reclassified as highly emetic. Patients who receive this combination or any highly emetic agents should receive a 5-HT 3 receptor antagonist, dexamethasone, and a neurokinin 1 (NK 1 ) receptor antagonist. A large trial validated the equivalency of fosaprepitant, a single-day intravenous formulation, with aprepitant; either therapy is appropriate. Preferential use of palonosetron is recommended for moderate emetic risk regimens, combined with dexamethasone. For low-risk agents, patients can be offered dexamethasone before the first dose of chemotherapy. Patients undergoing high emetic risk radiation therapy should receive a 5-HT 3 receptor antagonist before each fraction and for 24 hours after treatment and may receive a 5-day course of dexamethasone during fractions 1 to 5. The Update Committee noted the importance of continued symptom monitoring throughout therapy. Clinicians underestimate the incidence of nausea, which is not as well controlled as emesis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2010.34.4614

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 1,059

Metadata

Authors
Basch, E., Prestrud, A. A., Hesketh, P. J., Kris, M. G., Feyer, P. C., Somerfield, M. R., Chesney, M., Clark-Snow, R. A., Flaherty, A. M., Freundlich, B., Morrow, G., Rao, K. V., Schwartz, & Lyman, G. H.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2011-11-01
Volume
29
Issue
31
Pages
4189-4198
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2123267000
Cited by
1,059
References
5
FWCI
81.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antiemetics: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2010.34.4614
The paper
Basch, E., Prestrud, A. A., Hesketh, P. J., Kris, M. G., Feyer, P. C., Somerfield, M. R., Chesney, M., Clark-Snow, R. A., Flaherty, A. M., Freundlich, B., Morrow, G., Rao, K. V., Schwartz, & Lyman, G. H. (2011). Antiemetics: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2010.34.4614

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.