Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 176

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Clofarabine Plus Cytarabine Compared With Cytarabine Alone in Older Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myelogenous Leukemia: Results From the CLASSIC I Trial

Open access
Faderl, Stefan, Wetzler, Meir, Rizzieri, David, Schiller, Gary, Jagasia, Madan, Stuart, Robert, Ganguly, Siddhartha, Avigan, David, Craig, Michael, Collins, Robert, Maris, Michael, Kovacsovics, Tibor, Goldberg, Stuart, Seiter, Karen, Hari, Parameswaran, Greiner, Jochen, Vey, Norbert, Recher, Christian, Ravandi, Farhad, Wang, Eunice S., Vasconcelles, Michael, Huebner, Dirk, Kantarjian, Hagop M.·2012·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the receipt of clofarabine plus cytarabine (Clo+Ara-C arm) with cytarabine (Ara-C arm) in patients ≥ 55 years old with refractory or relapsed acute myelogenous leukemia (AML). Patients and Methods: Patients were randomly assigned to receive either clofarabine (Clo) 40 mg/m 2 or a placebo followed by Ara-C 1 g/m 2 for five consecutive days. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Secondary end points included event-free survival (EFS), 4-month EFS, overall remission rate (ORR; complete remission [CR] plus CR with incomplete peripheral blood count recovery), disease-free survival (DFS), duration of remission (DOR), and safety. Results: Among 320 patients with confirmed AML (median age, 67 years), the median OS was 6.6 months in the Clo+Ara-C arm and 6.3 months in the Ara-C arm (hazard ratio [HR], 1.00; 95% CI, 0.78 to 1.28; P = 1.00). The ORR was 46.9% in the Clo+Ara-C arm (35.2% CR) versus 22.9% in the Ara-C arm (17.8% CR; P < .01). EFS (HR: 0.63; 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.80; P < .01) and 4-month EFS (37.7% v 16.6%; P < .01) favored the Clo+Ara-C arm compared with Ara-C arm, respectively. DFS and DOR were similar in both arms. Overall 30-day mortality was 16% and 5% for CLO+Ara-C and Ara-C arms, respectively. In the Clo+Ara-C and Ara-C arms, the most common grade 3 to 4 toxicities were febrile neutropenia (47% v 35%, respectively), hypokalemia (18% v 11%, respectively), thrombocytopenia (16% v 17%, respectively), pneumonia (14% v 10%, respectively), anemia (13% v 0%, respectively), neutropenia (11% v 9%, respectively), increased AST (11% v 2%, respectively), and increased ALT (10% v 3%, respectively). Conclusion: Although the primary end point of OS did not differ between arms, Clo+Ara-C significantly improved response rates and EFS. Study follow-up continues, and the role of clofarabine in the treatment of adult patients with AML continues to be investigated.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2011.37.9743

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 176

Metadata

Authors
Faderl, S., Wetzler, M., Rizzieri, D., Schiller, G., Jagasia, M., Stuart, R., Ganguly, S., Avigan, D., Craig, M., Collins, R., Maris, M., Kovacsovics, T., Goldberg, S., Seiter, K., Hari, P., Greiner, J., Vey, N., Recher, C., Ravandi, F., Wang, E. S., Vasconcelles, M., Huebner, D., & Kantarjian, H. M.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2012-07-10
Volume
30
Issue
20
Pages
2492-2499
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2150480709
Cited by
176
References
1
FWCI
11.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clofarabine Plus Cytarabine Compared With Cytarabine Alone in Older Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myelogenous Leukemia: Results From the CLASSIC I Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2011.37.9743
The paper
Faderl, S., Wetzler, M., Rizzieri, D., Schiller, G., Jagasia, M., Stuart, R., Ganguly, S., Avigan, D., Craig, M., Collins, R., Maris, M., Kovacsovics, T., Goldberg, S., Seiter, K., Hari, P., Greiner, J., Vey, N., Recher, C., Ravandi, F., . . . Kantarjian, H. M. (2012). Clofarabine Plus Cytarabine Compared With Cytarabine Alone in Older Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myelogenous Leukemia: Results From the CLASSIC I Trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2011.37.9743

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.