Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,137

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Revised Prognostic Staging System for Light Chain Amyloidosis Incorporating Cardiac Biomarkers and Serum Free Light Chain Measurements

Open access
Kumar, Shaji, Dispenzieri, Angela, Lacy, Martha Q., Hayman, Suzanne R., Buadi, Francis K., Colby, Colin, Laumann, Kristina, Zeldenrust, Steve R., Leung, Nelson, Dingli, David, Greipp, Philip R., Lust, John A., Russell, Stephen J., Kyle, Robert A., Rajkumar, S. Vincent, Gertz, Morie A.·2012·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: Cardiac involvement predicts poor prognosis in light chain (AL) amyloidosis, and the current prognostic classification is based on cardiac biomarkers troponin-T (cTnT) and N-terminal pro–B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-ProBNP). However, long-term outcome is dependent on the underlying plasma cell clone, and incorporation of clonal characteristics may allow for better risk stratification. Patients and Methods: We developed a prognostic model based on 810 patients with newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis, which was further examined in two other datasets: 303 patients undergoing stem-cell transplantation, and 103 patients enrolled onto different clinical trials. Results: We examined the prognostic value of plasma cell–related characteristics (ie, difference between involved and uninvolved light chain [FLC-diff], marrow plasma cell percentage, circulating plasma cells, plasma cell labeling index, and β 2 microglobulin). In a multivariate model that included these characteristics as well as cTnT and NT-ProBNP, only FLC-diff, cTnT, and NT-ProBNP were independently prognostic for overall survival (OS). Patients were assigned a score of 1 for each of FLC-diff ≥ 18 mg/dL, cTnT ≥ 0.025 ng/mL, and NT-ProBNP ≥ 1,800 pg/mL, creating stages I to IV with scores of 0 to 3 points, respectively. The proportions of patients with stages I, II, III and IV disease were 189 (25%), 206 (27%), 186 (25%) and 177 (23%), and their median OS from diagnosis was 94.1, 40.3, 14, and 5.8 months, respectively (P < .001). This classification system was validated in the other datasets. Conclusion: Incorporation of serum FLC-diff into the current staging system improves risk stratification for patients with AL amyloidosis and will help develop risk-adapted therapies for AL amyloidosis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2011.38.5724

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,137

Metadata

Authors
Kumar, S., Dispenzieri, A., Lacy, M. Q., Hayman, S. R., Buadi, F. K., Colby, C., Laumann, K., Zeldenrust, S. R., Leung, N., Dingli, D., Greipp, P. R., Lust, J. A., Russell, S. J., Kyle, R. A., Rajkumar, S. V., & Gertz, M. A.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2012-03-20
Volume
30
Issue
9
Pages
989-995
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2171033052
Cited by
1,137
References
0
FWCI
13.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Revised Prognostic Staging System for Light Chain Amyloidosis Incorporating Cardiac Biomarkers and Serum Free Light Chain Measurements. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2011.38.5724
The paper
Kumar, S., Dispenzieri, A., Lacy, M. Q., Hayman, S. R., Buadi, F. K., Colby, C., Laumann, K., Zeldenrust, S. R., Leung, N., Dingli, D., Greipp, P. R., Lust, J. A., Russell, S. J., Kyle, R. A., Rajkumar, S. V., & Gertz, M. A. (2012). Revised Prognostic Staging System for Light Chain Amyloidosis Incorporating Cardiac Biomarkers and Serum Free Light Chain Measurements. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2011.38.5724

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.