Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 196

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Randomized Phase II Trial of Erlotinib With and Without Entinostat in Patients With Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Who Progressed on Prior Chemotherapy

Open access
Witta, Samir E., Jotte, Robert M., Konduri, Katrik, Neubauer, Marcus A., Spira, Alexander I., Ruxer, Robert L., Varella-Garcia, Marileila, Bunn, Paul A., Hirsch, Fred R.·2012·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: Histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACis) have been shown to overcome resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) linked to epigenetic changes and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) state. This randomized phase II study evaluated the outcome of erlotinib with and without the isoform selective HDACi, entinostat. Patients and Methods: Previously treated patients with stage IIIB/IV non–small-cell lung cancer, no prior EGFR-TKIs, and performance status ≤ 2 were randomly administered erlotinib 150 mg on days 1 through 28 plus entinostat 10 mg orally on days 1 and 15 every 28 days (EE) or erlotinib plus placebo (EP). The primary end point was 4-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate with additional end points including 6-month PFS rate, PFS, and overall survival (OS). Exploratory analyses included EMT- and EGFR-related biomarker analysis on archival tissue. Results: One hundred thirty-two patients were enrolled (EE, 67; EP, 65). The 4-month PFS rate was comparable for both groups (EE, 18% v EP, 20%; P = .7). In the subset of patients with high E-cadherin levels, OS was longer in the EE group compared with the EP group (9.4 v 5.4 months; hazard ratio, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.13 to 0.92; P = .03) with a corresponding trend toward increased PFS. The adverse event (AE) profile was acceptable, with rash, fatigue, diarrhea, and nausea the most common AEs in both groups. Conclusion: Erlotinib combined with entinostat did not improve the outcomes of patients in the overall study population when compared with erlotinib monotherapy. High E-cadherin expression levels at time of diagnosis indicate an increased sensitivity to HDACi/EGFR-TKI inhibition providing the basis for a biomarker-driven validation study.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2011.38.9411

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 196

Metadata

Authors
Witta, S. E., Jotte, R. M., Konduri, K., Neubauer, M. A., Spira, A. I., Ruxer, R. L., Varella-Garcia, M., Bunn, P. A., & Hirsch, F. R.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2012-06-20
Volume
30
Issue
18
Pages
2248-2255
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2130027352
Cited by
196
References
4
FWCI
16.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Randomized Phase II Trial of Erlotinib With and Without Entinostat in Patients With Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Who Progressed on Prior Chemotherapy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2011.38.9411
The paper
Witta, S. E., Jotte, R. M., Konduri, K., Neubauer, M. A., Spira, A. I., Ruxer, R. L., Varella-Garcia, M., Bunn, P. A., & Hirsch, F. R. (2012). Randomized Phase II Trial of Erlotinib With and Without Entinostat in Patients With Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Who Progressed on Prior Chemotherapy. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2011.38.9411

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.