Cited by 1,186Lung Cancer Treatments and MutationsLung Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentLung Cancer Research Studies

Erlotinib as maintenance treatment in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 3 study

Open access
Cappuzzo, Federico, Ciuleanu, Tudor, Stelmakh, Lilia, Cicenas, Saulius, Szczésna, Aleksandra, Juhász, Erzsébet, Esteban, Emilio, Molinier, Olivier +5 more·2010·The Lancet Oncology

Abstract

Background First-line chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is usually limited to four to six cycles. Maintenance therapy can delay progression and prolong survival. The oral epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine-kinase inhibitor erlotinib has proven efficacy and tolerability in second-line NSCLC. We designed the phase 3, placebo-controlled Sequential Tarceva in Unresectable NSCLC (SATURN; BO18192) study to assess use of erlotinib as maintenance therapy in patients with non-progressive disease following first-line platinum-doublet chemotherapy.Methods Between December, 2005, and May, 2008, 1949 patients were included in the run-in phase (four cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy). At the end of the run-in phase, 889 patients who did not have progressive disease were entered into the main study, and were randomly allocated using a 1:1 adaptive randomisation method through a third-party interactive voice response system to receive erlotinib (150 mg/day; n=438) or placebo (n=451) until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients were stratified by EGFR immunohistochemistry status, stage, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, chemotherapy regimen, smoking history, and region. Co-primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) in all analysable patients irrespective of EGFR status, and PFS in patients whose tumours had EGFR protein overexpression, as determined by immunohistochemistry. This study is registered with www.ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00556712.Findings 884 patients were analysable for PFS; 437 in the erlotinib group and 447 in the placebo group. After a median follow-up of 11.4 months for the erlotinib group and 11.5 months for the placebo group, median PFS was significantly longer with erlotinib than with placebo: 12.3 weeks for patients in the erlotinib group versus 11.1 weeks for those in the placebo group (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.62-0.82; p<0.0001). PFS was also significantly longer in patients with EGFR-positive immunohistochemistry who were treated with erlotinib (n=307) compared with EGFR-positive patients given placebo (n=311; median PFS 12.3 weeks in the erlotinib group vs 11.1 weeks in the placebo group; HR 0.69, 0.58-0.82; p<0.0001). The most common grade 3 or higher adverse events were rash (37 [9%] of 443 patients in the erlotinib group vs none of 445 in the placebo group) and diarrhoea (seven [2%] of 443 patients vs none of 445). Serious adverse events were reported in 47 patients (11%) on erlotinib compared with 34 patients (8%) on placebo. The most common serious adverse event was pneumonia (seven cases [2%] with erlotinib and four [<1%] with placebo).Interpretation Maintenance therapy with erlotinib for patients with NSCLC is well tolerated and significantly prolongs PFS compared with placebo. First-line maintenance with erlotinib could be considered in patients who do not progress after four cycles of chemotherapy.Funding F Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1470-2045(10)70112-1

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cappuzzo, F., Ciuleanu, T., Stelmakh, L., Cicenas, S., Szczésna, A., Juhász, E., Esteban, E., Molinier, O., Brugger, W., Melezínek, I., Klingelschmitt, G., Klughammer, B., & Giaccone, G.
Affiliations
  • Ospedale di Livorno (IT)
  • Institute of Oncology Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuta (RO)
  • First Pavlov State Medical University of St. Petersburg (RU)
  • Országos Korányi Tbc és Pulmonológiai Intézet (HU)
  • Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias (ES)
  • Centre Hospitalier du Mans (FR)
  • University of Freiburg (DE)
  • Roche (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG (CH)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Cappuzzo, Federico
Venue
The Lancet Oncology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-06
Volume
11
Issue
6
Pages
521-529
ISSN
1470-2045 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2100912832
Cited by
1,186
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 49 · 2017: 81 · 2016: 73 · 2015: 145 · 2014: 142 · 2013: 172 · 2012: 176
FWCI
146.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Consultation of the Doctoral Thesis Database (TESEO) (Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Lung Cancer Research Studies
Keywords
erlotinib, maintenance therapy, advanced non-small cell lung cancer, EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors, EGFR overexpression, progression-free survival, platinum-based chemotherapy, EGFR immunohistochemistry, second-line therapy, oral anticancer drugs, quality of life, patient-reported outcomes, patient-reported quality of life
MeSH terms
Erlotinib Hydrochloride, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antineoplastic Agents, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Female, Humans, Immunohistochemistry, Lung Neoplasms, Male, Middle Aged, Mutation, Quinazolines, Survival Rate, Disease-Free Survival, Protein Kinase Inhibitors, ErbB Receptors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review