Cited by 117Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatmentEndometrial and Cervical Cancer TreatmentsIntraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies

Low-stage ovarian clear cell carcinoma: population-based outcomes in British Columbia, Canada, with evidence for a survival benefit as a result of irradiation

Open access
Hoskins, Paul J., Le, Nhu, Gilks, Blake, Tinker, Anna, Santos, Jennifer, Wong, Frances, Swenerton, Kenneth D.·2012·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the population-based outcomes of stage I and II ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) in a North American population treated with carboplatin/paclitaxel and abdominopelvic irradiation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis was performed of 241 patients referred in the carboplatin/paclitaxel era. Irradiation was to be used with a few defined exceptions. However, because of differing beliefs as to its effectiveness, its use was consistently avoided by specific oncologists, allowing the opportunity to study its possible effect on disease-free survival (DFS) in these concurrent cohorts. RESULTS: Five- and 10-year DFS rates were 84% and 70% for stage IA/B; 67% and 57% for stage IC; and 49% and 44% for stage II, respectively. Five- and 10-year DFS rates for those with stage IC disease based purely on rupture were similar to rates for patients with stage IA/B, at 92% and 71%, respectively. The remaining patients with stage IC had 48% 5- and 10-year DFS. Multivariate analysis using a decision tree identified positive cytology as the most important factor (72% relapse rate if positive and 27% if negative or unknown). If, in addition, the capsule surface was involved, then the relapse rate was 93%. Irradiation had no discernible survival benefit for patients with stage IA and IC (rupture alone), whereas for the remainder of patients with stage IC and stage II, it improved DFS by 20% at 5 years (relative risk, 0.5); the benefit was most evident in the cytologically negative/unknown group. CONCLUSION: DFS is similar in this North American population with early OCCC to the DFS reported in Asia. A potential benefit from irradiation was evident in a subset.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2011.40.1646

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some series report an improvement in 5-year overall survival and progression free survival using abdominal radiation for ovarian carcinomas, especially for CCC.

    “Some series report an improvement in 5-year overall survival and progression free survival using abdominal radiation for ovarian carcinomas, especially for CCC (Hoskins et al., 2012, Macrie et al., 2014).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 55 · Cited by 117

Authors
Hoskins, P. J., Le, N., Gilks, B., Tinker, A., Santos, J., Wong, F., & Swenerton, K. D.
Affiliations
  • BC Cancer Agency (CA)
  • All authors: British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2012-05-10
Volume
30
Issue
14
Pages
1656-1662
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2110956488
Cited by
117
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 3
FWCI
10.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies
Keywords
ovarian clear cell carcinoma, early-stage ovarian cancer, carboplatin, paclitaxel, disease-free survival, tumor rupture, cytology, relapse, population-based outcomes
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Analysis of Variance, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Biopsy, Needle, British Columbia, Combined Modality Therapy, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Immunohistochemistry, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Invasiveness, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Neoplasm Staging, Ovarian Neoplasms, Radiotherapy Dosage, Registries, Retrospective Studies, Time Factors, Cohort Studies, Multivariate Analysis, Survival Analysis, Treatment Outcome, Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell, Risk Assessment, Disease-Free Survival, Statistics, Nonparametric, Radiotherapy, Adjuvant, Kaplan-Meier Estimate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review