The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
BRAF/NRAS Mutation Frequencies Among Primary Tumors and Metastases in Patients With Melanoma
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: The prevalence of BRAF, NRAS, and p16CDKN2A mutations during melanoma progression remains inconclusive. We investigated the prevalence and distribution of mutations in these genes in different melanoma tissues. Patients and Methods: In all, 291 tumor tissues from 132 patients with melanoma were screened. Paired samples of primary melanomas (n = 102) and synchronous or asynchronous metastases from the same patients (n = 165) were included. Tissue samples underwent mutation analysis (automated DNA sequencing). Secondary lesions included lymph nodes (n = 84), and skin (n = 36), visceral (n = 25), and brain (n = 44) sites. Results: BRAF/NRAS mutations were identified in 58% of primary melanomas (43% BRAF; 15% NRAS); 62% in lymph nodes, 61% subcutaneous, 56% visceral, and 70% in brain sites. Mutations were observed in 63% of metastases (48% BRAF; 15% NRAS), a nonsignificant increase in mutation frequency after progression from primary melanoma. Of the paired samples, lymph nodes (93% consistency) and visceral metastases (96% consistency) presented a highly similar distribution of BRAF/NRAS mutations versus primary melanomas, with a significantly less consistent pattern in brain (80%) and skin metastases (75%). This suggests that independent subclones are generated in some patients. p16CDKN2A mutations were identified in 7% and 14% of primary melanomas and metastases, with a low consistency (31%) between secondary and primary tumor samples. Conclusion: In the era of targeted therapies, assessment of the spectrum and distribution of alterations in molecular targets among patients with melanoma is needed. Our findings about the prevalence of BRAF/NRAS/p16CDKN2A mutations in paired tumor lesions from patients with melanoma may be useful in the management of this disease.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mutations of the BRAF gene in human cancer
Davies, H., Bignell, G. R., Cox, C., Stephens, P., Edkins, S., Clegg, S., Teague, J., Woffendin, H., Garnett, M. J., Bottomley, W., et al. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature00766 · Cited by 10,674
Self-citationImproved survival with vemurafenib in melanoma with BRAF V600E mutation
Chapman, P. B., Hauschild, A., Robert, C., Haanen, J. B., Ascierto, P., Larkin, J., Dummer, R., Garbe, C., Testori, A., Maio, M., et al. (2011) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1103782 · Cited by 7,720
Self-citationBRAFE600-associated senescence-like cell cycle arrest of human naevi
Michaloglou, C., Vredeveld, L. C. W., Soengas, M. S., Denoyelle, C., Kuilman, T., van der Horst, C. M. A. M., Majoor, D. M., Shay, J. W., Mooi, W. J., & Peeper, D. S. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03890 · Cited by 2,160
High frequency of BRAF mutations in nevi
Pollock, P. M., Harper, U. L., Hansen, K. S., Yudt, L. M., Stark, M., Robbins, C. M., Moses, T. Y., Hostetter, G., Wagner, U., Kakareka, J., et al. (2003) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1054 · Cited by 1,730
Sensi, M., Nicolini, G., Petti, C., Bersani, I., Lozupone, F., Molla, A., Vegetti, C., Nonaka, D., Mortarini, R., Parmiani, G., et al. (2006) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1209379 · Cited by 183
Cited by
ERK/MAPK signalling pathway and tumorigenesis (Review)
Guo, Y., Pan, W., Liu, S., Shen, Z., Xu, Y., & Hu, L. (2020) · Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine · doi:10.3892/etm.2020.8454 · Cited by 1,475
Steeg, P. S. (2016) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc.2016.25 · Cited by 1,363
The MAPK pathway across different malignancies: A new perspective
Burotto, M., Chiou, V. L., Lee, J., & Kohn, E. C. (2014) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.28864 · Cited by 956
Ascierto, P. A., Schadendorf, D., Berking, C., Agarwala, S. S., van Herpen, C. M., Queirolo, P., Blank, C. U., Hauschild, A., Beck, J. T., St-Pierre, A., et al. (2013) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(13)70024-x · Cited by 640
Self-citationPlanning cancer control in Latin America and the Caribbean
Goss, P. E., Lee, B. L., Badovinac-Crnjevic, T., Strasser-Weippl, K., Chavarri-Guerra, Y., Louis, J. S., Villarreal-Garza, C., Unger-Saldaña, K., Ferreyra, M., Debiasi, M., et al. (2013) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(13)70048-2 · Cited by 499
Metadata
- Authors
- Colombino, M., Capone, M., Lissia, A., Cossu, A., Rubino, C., De Giorgi, V., Massi, D., Fonsatti, E., Staibano, S., Nappi, O., Pagani, E., Casula, M., Manca, A., Sini, M., Franco, R., Botti, G., Caracò, C., Mozzillo, N., Ascierto, P. A., & Palmieri, G.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2012-07-10
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 2522-2529
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2110478149
- Cited by
- 471
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 19.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: BRAF/NRAS Mutation Frequencies Among Primary Tumors and Metastases in Patients With Melanoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2011.41.2452
- The paper
- Colombino, M., Capone, M., Lissia, A., Cossu, A., Rubino, C., De Giorgi, V., Massi, D., Fonsatti, E., Staibano, S., Nappi, O., Pagani, E., Casula, M., Manca, A., Sini, M., Franco, R., Botti, G., Caracò, C., Mozzillo, N., Ascierto, P. A., & Palmieri, G. (2012). BRAF/NRAS Mutation Frequencies Among Primary Tumors and Metastases in Patients With Melanoma. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2011.41.2452
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.