Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 471

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

BRAF/NRAS Mutation Frequencies Among Primary Tumors and Metastases in Patients With Melanoma

Open access
Colombino, Maria, Capone, Mariaelena, Lissia, Amelia, Cossu, Antonio, Rubino, Corrado, De Giorgi, Vincenzo, Massi, Daniela, Fonsatti, Ester, Staibano, Stefania, Nappi, Oscar, Pagani, Elena, Casula, Milena, Manca, Antonella, Sini, MariaCristina, Franco, Renato, Botti, Gerardo, Caracò, Corrado, Mozzillo, Nicola, Ascierto, Paolo A., Palmieri, Giuseppe·2012·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: The prevalence of BRAF, NRAS, and p16CDKN2A mutations during melanoma progression remains inconclusive. We investigated the prevalence and distribution of mutations in these genes in different melanoma tissues. Patients and Methods: In all, 291 tumor tissues from 132 patients with melanoma were screened. Paired samples of primary melanomas (n = 102) and synchronous or asynchronous metastases from the same patients (n = 165) were included. Tissue samples underwent mutation analysis (automated DNA sequencing). Secondary lesions included lymph nodes (n = 84), and skin (n = 36), visceral (n = 25), and brain (n = 44) sites. Results: BRAF/NRAS mutations were identified in 58% of primary melanomas (43% BRAF; 15% NRAS); 62% in lymph nodes, 61% subcutaneous, 56% visceral, and 70% in brain sites. Mutations were observed in 63% of metastases (48% BRAF; 15% NRAS), a nonsignificant increase in mutation frequency after progression from primary melanoma. Of the paired samples, lymph nodes (93% consistency) and visceral metastases (96% consistency) presented a highly similar distribution of BRAF/NRAS mutations versus primary melanomas, with a significantly less consistent pattern in brain (80%) and skin metastases (75%). This suggests that independent subclones are generated in some patients. p16CDKN2A mutations were identified in 7% and 14% of primary melanomas and metastases, with a low consistency (31%) between secondary and primary tumor samples. Conclusion: In the era of targeted therapies, assessment of the spectrum and distribution of alterations in molecular targets among patients with melanoma is needed. Our findings about the prevalence of BRAF/NRAS/p16CDKN2A mutations in paired tumor lesions from patients with melanoma may be useful in the management of this disease.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2011.41.2452

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 471

Metadata

Authors
Colombino, M., Capone, M., Lissia, A., Cossu, A., Rubino, C., De Giorgi, V., Massi, D., Fonsatti, E., Staibano, S., Nappi, O., Pagani, E., Casula, M., Manca, A., Sini, M., Franco, R., Botti, G., Caracò, C., Mozzillo, N., Ascierto, P. A., & Palmieri, G.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2012-07-10
Volume
30
Issue
20
Pages
2522-2529
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2110478149
Cited by
471
References
5
FWCI
19.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: BRAF/NRAS Mutation Frequencies Among Primary Tumors and Metastases in Patients With Melanoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2011.41.2452
The paper
Colombino, M., Capone, M., Lissia, A., Cossu, A., Rubino, C., De Giorgi, V., Massi, D., Fonsatti, E., Staibano, S., Nappi, O., Pagani, E., Casula, M., Manca, A., Sini, M., Franco, R., Botti, G., Caracò, C., Mozzillo, N., Ascierto, P. A., & Palmieri, G. (2012). BRAF/NRAS Mutation Frequencies Among Primary Tumors and Metastases in Patients With Melanoma. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2011.41.2452

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.