The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Prospective Multicenter Study Evaluating the Survival of Patients With Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Undergoing Laparoscopic Para-Aortic Lymphadenectomy Before Chemoradiotherapy in the Era of Positron Emission Tomography Imaging
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: The aim of this prospective study conducted in three French comprehensive cancer centers was to evaluate the therapeutic impact on survival of laparoscopic para-aortic (PA) staging surgery in locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) before chemoradiotherapy. Patients and Methods: We conducted a prospective multicenter study of 237 patients treated from 2004 to 2011 for LACC with negative positron emission tomography (PET) imaging of the PA area and undergoing laparoscopic PA lymphadenectomy. Radiation fields were extended to the PA area when PA nodes were involved. Chemoradiotherapy modalities were homogeneous across institutions. Patients with a poor prognosis histologic subtype or peritoneal carcinosis were excluded. Results: Patients had clinical International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stages IB2 (n = 79), IIA (n = 10), IIB (n = 121), III (n = 22), or IVA (n = 5). One hundred ninety-nine patients had squamous carcinoma, and 38 had adenocarcinoma/adenosquamous lesions. Twenty-nine patients (12%) had nodal involvement (false-negative PET–computed tomography [CT] results)—16 with a PA nodal metastasis measuring more than 5 mm and 13 with a nodal metastasis measuring ≤ 5 mm. Event-free survival rates at 3 years in patients without PA involvement or with PA metastasis measuring ≤ or more than 5 mm were 74% (SE, 4%), 69% (SE, 21%), and 17% (SE, 14%; P < .001). Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the largest series of patients reported undergoing such a strategy. We obtained the same survival rate for patients with PA nodal metastasis ≤ 5 mm and patients without PA lymph node involvement, suggesting that this strategy is highly efficient in such patients. Conversely, the survival of patients with PA nodal involvement greater than 5 mm remained poor, despite the absence of extrapelvic disease on PET-CT imaging in this subgroup.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the cervix uteri
Bhatla, N., Berek, J. S., Cuello Fredes, M., Denny, L. A., Grenman, S., Karunaratne, K., Kehoe, S. T., Konishi, I., Olawaiye, A. B., Prat, J., et al. (2019) · International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics · doi:10.1002/ijgo.12749 · Cited by 1,048
Legge, F., Chiantera, V., Macchia, G., Fagotti, A., Fanfani, F., Ercoli, A., Gallotta, V., Morganti, A. G., Valentini, V., Scambia, G., et al. (2015) · Gynecologic Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.04.035 · Cited by 43
Metadata
- Authors
- Gouy, S., Morice, P., Narducci, F., Uzan, C., Martinez, A., Rey, A., Bentivegna, E., Pautier, P., Deandreis, D., Querleu, D., Haie-Meder, C., & Leblanc, E.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2013-08-20
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 3026-3033
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2145311197
- Cited by
- 200
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prospective Multicenter Study Evaluating the Survival of Patients With Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Undergoing Laparoscopic Para-Aortic Lymphadenectomy Before Chemoradiotherapy in the Era of Positron Emission Tomography Imaging. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2012.47.3520
- The paper
- Gouy, S., Morice, P., Narducci, F., Uzan, C., Martinez, A., Rey, A., Bentivegna, E., Pautier, P., Deandreis, D., Querleu, D., Haie-Meder, C., & Leblanc, E. (2013). Prospective Multicenter Study Evaluating the Survival of Patients With Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Undergoing Laparoscopic Para-Aortic Lymphadenectomy Before Chemoradiotherapy in the Era of Positron Emission Tomography Imaging. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2012.47.3520
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.