Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 200

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Prospective Multicenter Study Evaluating the Survival of Patients With Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Undergoing Laparoscopic Para-Aortic Lymphadenectomy Before Chemoradiotherapy in the Era of Positron Emission Tomography Imaging

Open access
Gouy, Sebastien, Morice, Philippe, Narducci, Fabrice, Uzan, Catherine, Martinez, Alejandra, Rey, Annie, Bentivegna, Enrica, Pautier, Patricia, Deandreis, Desiree, Querleu, Denis, Haie-Meder, Christine, Leblanc, Eric·2013·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this prospective study conducted in three French comprehensive cancer centers was to evaluate the therapeutic impact on survival of laparoscopic para-aortic (PA) staging surgery in locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) before chemoradiotherapy. Patients and Methods: We conducted a prospective multicenter study of 237 patients treated from 2004 to 2011 for LACC with negative positron emission tomography (PET) imaging of the PA area and undergoing laparoscopic PA lymphadenectomy. Radiation fields were extended to the PA area when PA nodes were involved. Chemoradiotherapy modalities were homogeneous across institutions. Patients with a poor prognosis histologic subtype or peritoneal carcinosis were excluded. Results: Patients had clinical International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stages IB2 (n = 79), IIA (n = 10), IIB (n = 121), III (n = 22), or IVA (n = 5). One hundred ninety-nine patients had squamous carcinoma, and 38 had adenocarcinoma/adenosquamous lesions. Twenty-nine patients (12%) had nodal involvement (false-negative PET–computed tomography [CT] results)—16 with a PA nodal metastasis measuring more than 5 mm and 13 with a nodal metastasis measuring ≤ 5 mm. Event-free survival rates at 3 years in patients without PA involvement or with PA metastasis measuring ≤ or more than 5 mm were 74% (SE, 4%), 69% (SE, 21%), and 17% (SE, 14%; P < .001). Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the largest series of patients reported undergoing such a strategy. We obtained the same survival rate for patients with PA nodal metastasis ≤ 5 mm and patients without PA lymph node involvement, suggesting that this strategy is highly efficient in such patients. Conversely, the survival of patients with PA nodal involvement greater than 5 mm remained poor, despite the absence of extrapelvic disease on PET-CT imaging in this subgroup.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2012.47.3520

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 200

Metadata

Authors
Gouy, S., Morice, P., Narducci, F., Uzan, C., Martinez, A., Rey, A., Bentivegna, E., Pautier, P., Deandreis, D., Querleu, D., Haie-Meder, C., & Leblanc, E.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2013-08-20
Volume
31
Issue
24
Pages
3026-3033
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2145311197
Cited by
200
References
0
FWCI
19.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prospective Multicenter Study Evaluating the Survival of Patients With Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Undergoing Laparoscopic Para-Aortic Lymphadenectomy Before Chemoradiotherapy in the Era of Positron Emission Tomography Imaging. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2012.47.3520
The paper
Gouy, S., Morice, P., Narducci, F., Uzan, C., Martinez, A., Rey, A., Bentivegna, E., Pautier, P., Deandreis, D., Querleu, D., Haie-Meder, C., & Leblanc, E. (2013). Prospective Multicenter Study Evaluating the Survival of Patients With Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Undergoing Laparoscopic Para-Aortic Lymphadenectomy Before Chemoradiotherapy in the Era of Positron Emission Tomography Imaging. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2012.47.3520

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.