The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the cervix uteri
Abstract
Objective: To revise FIGO staging of carcinoma of the cervix uteri, allowing incorporation of imaging and/or pathological findings, and clinical assessment of tumor size and disease extent. Methods: Review of literature and consensus view of the FIGO Gynecologic Oncology Committee and related societies and organizations. Results: In stage I, revision of the definition of microinvasion and lesion size as follows. Stage IA: lateral extension measurement is removed; stage IB has three subgroups—stage IB 1: invasive carcinomas ≥5 mm and <2 cm in greatest diameter; stage IB 2: tumors 2–4 cm; stage IB 3: tumors ≥4 cm. Imaging or pathology findings may be used to assess retroperitoneal lymph nodes; if metastatic, the case is assigned stage IIIC; if only pelvic lymph nodes, the case is assigned stage IIIC 1; if para‐aortic nodes are involved, the case is assigned stage IIIC 2. Notations ‘r’ and ‘p’ will indicate the method used to derive the stage—i.e., imaging or pathology, respectively—and should be recorded. Routine investigations and other methods (e.g., examination under anesthesia, cystoscopy, proctoscopy, etc.) are not mandatory and are to be recommended based on clinical findings and standard of care. Conclusion: The revised cervical cancer staging is applicable to all resource levels. Data collection and publication will inform future revisions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bray, F., Ferlay, J., Soerjomataram, I., Siegel, R. L., Torre, L. A., & Jemal, A. (2018) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.21492 · Cited by 84,109
Bipat, S., Glas, A. S., Velden, J. V. D., Zwinderman, A. H., Bossuyt, P. M. M., & Stoker, J. (2003) · Gynecologic Oncology · doi:10.1016/s0090-8258(03)00409-8 · Cited by 393
Choi, H. J., Ju, W., Myung, S. K., & Kim, Y. (2010) · Cancer Science · doi:10.1111/j.1349-7006.2010.01532.x · Cited by 317
Mitchell, D. G., Snyder, B., Coakley, F., Reinhold, C., Thomas, G., Amendola, M., Schwartz, L. H., Woodward, P., Pannu, H., & Hricak, H. (2006) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2006.07.4799 · Cited by 310
Selman, T. J., Mann, C., Zamora, J., Appleyard, T.-L., & Khan, K. (2008) · Canadian Medical Association Journal · doi:10.1503/cmaj.071124 · Cited by 254
Bentivegna, E., Maulard, A., Pautier, P., Chargari, C., Gouy, S., & Morice, P. (2016) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.06.032 · Cited by 210
Gouy, S., Morice, P., Narducci, F., Uzan, C., Martinez, A., Rey, A., Bentivegna, E., Pautier, P., Deandreis, D., Querleu, D., et al. (2013) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2012.47.3520 · Cited by 200
Transrectal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in staging of early cervical cancer
Fischerová, D., Cibula, D., Stenhova, H., Vondrichova, H., Calda, P., Zikán, M., Freitag, P., Sláma, J., Dundr, P., & BELACEK, J. (2007) · International Journal of Gynecological Cancer · doi:10.1111/j.1525-1438.2007.01072.x · Cited by 145
Tax, C., Rovers, M. M., de Graaf, C., Zusterzeel, P. L. M., & Bekkers, R. L. M. (2015) · Gynecologic Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.09.076 · Cited by 134
Zhang, Q., Li, W., Kanis, M. J., Qi, G., Li, M., Yang, X., & Kong, B. (2017) · Oncotarget · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.16233 · Cited by 107
Cited by
Cancer of the cervix uteri: 2025 update
Bhatla, N., Aoki, D., Sharma, D. N., & Sankaranarayanan, R. (2025) · International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics · doi:10.1002/ijgo.70277 · Cited by 58
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Bhatla, N., Berek, J. S., Cuello Fredes, M., Denny, L. A., Grenman, S., Karunaratne, K., Kehoe, S. T., Konishi, I., Olawaiye, A. B., Prat, J., & Sankaranarayanan, R.
- Venue
- International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-01-17
- Volume
- 145
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 129-135
- ISSN
- 0020-6695 (ISSN-L)
- 0020-7292
- 1879-3479
- OpenAlex
- W2910253964
- Cited by
- 1,048
- References
- 15
- FWCI
- 118.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the cervix uteri. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ijgo.12749
- The paper
- Bhatla, N., Berek, J. S., Cuello Fredes, M., Denny, L. A., Grenman, S., Karunaratne, K., Kehoe, S. T., Konishi, I., Olawaiye, A. B., Prat, J., & Sankaranarayanan, R. (2019). Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the cervix uteri. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.12749
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
