Tamoxifen and Risk of Contralateral Breast Cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: To determine whether adjuvant tamoxifen treatment for breast cancer (BC) is associated with reduced contralateral breast cancer (CBC) risk for BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 mutation carriers. Methods: Analysis of pooled observational cohort data, self-reported at enrollment and at follow-up from the International BRCA1, and BRCA2 Carrier Cohort Study, Kathleen Cuningham Foundation Consortium for Research into Familial Breast Cancer, and Breast Cancer Family Registry. Eligible women were BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers diagnosed with unilateral BC since 1970 and no other invasive cancer or tamoxifen use before first BC. Hazard ratios (HRs) for CBC associated with tamoxifen use were estimated using Cox regression, adjusting for year and age of diagnosis, country, and bilateral oophorectomy and censoring at contralateral mastectomy, death, or loss to follow-up. Results: Of 1,583 BRCA1 and 881 BRCA2 mutation carriers, 383 (24%) and 454 (52%), respectively, took tamoxifen after first BC diagnosis. There were 520 CBCs over 20,104 person-years of observation. The adjusted HR estimates were 0.38 (95% CI, 0.27 to 0.55) and 0.33 (95% CI, 0.22 to 0.50) for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers, respectively. After left truncating at recruitment to the cohort, adjusted HR estimates were 0.58 (95% CI, 0.29 to 1.13) and 0.48 (95% CI, 0.22 to 1.05) based on 657 BRCA1 and 426 BRCA2 mutation carriers with 100 CBCs over 4,392 person-years of prospective follow-up. HRs did not differ by estrogen receptor status of the first BC (missing for 56% of cases). Conclusion: This study provides evidence that tamoxifen use is associated with a reduction in CBC risk for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Further follow-up of these cohorts will provide increased statistical power for future prospective analyses.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In a study of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with unilateral breast cancer, tamoxifen use was associated with adjusted HRs for contralateral breast cancer of 0.38 (95% CI 0.27-0.55) for BRCA1 carriers and 0.33 (95% CI 0.22-0.50) for BRCA2 carriers.
“The adjusted HRs were 0.38 (95% CI: 0.27 - 0.55) for BRCA1 carriers and 0.33 (95% CI: 0.22 - 0.50) for BRCA2 carriers.”
From Screening, Risk Reduction Strategies, and Clinical Management of Unaffected Carriers of <i>BRCA1</i> or <i>BRCA2</i> Pathogenic Variants (2026) · cites this paper as [65]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Antoniou, A., Pharoah, P. D. P., Narod, S., Risch, H. A., Eyfjord, J. E., Hopper, J. L., Loman, N., Olsson, H., Johannsson, O., Borg, Å., et al. (2003) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1086/375033 · Cited by 3,680 · see citing works
Self-citationControl of mammary stem cell function by steroid hormone signalling
Asselin-Labat, M.-L., Vaillant, F., Sheridan, J. M., Pal, B., Wu, D., Simpson, E. R., Yasuda, H., Smyth, G. K., Martin, T. J., Lindeman, G. J., et al. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09027 · Cited by 693 · see citing works
Predictors of contralateral breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers
Metcalfe, K., Gershman, S., Lynch, H. T., Ghadirian, P., Tung, N., Kim-Sing, C., Olopade, O. I., Domchek, S., McLennan, J., Eisen, A., et al. (2011) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/bjc.2011.120 · Cited by 232 · see citing works
Malone, K. E., Begg, C. B., Haile, R. W., Borg, A., Concannon, P., Tellhed, L., Xue, S., Teraoka, S., Bernstein, L., Capanu, M., et al. (2010) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2009.24.2495 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Nelson HD, Fu R, Griffin JC, et al: Systematic review: Comparative effectiveness of medications to reduce risk for primary breast cancer. Ann Intern Med 151:703-715, W-226-235, 2009
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kuchenbaecker, K. B., Hopper, J. L., Barnes, D. R., Phillips, K.-A., Mooij, T. M., Roos-Blom, M.-J., Jervis, S., van Leeuwen, F. E., Milne, R. L., Andrieu, N., et al. (2017) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2017.7112 · Cited by 2,954 · see citing works
Self-citationKey steps for effective breast cancer prevention
Britt, K. L., Cuzick, J., & Phillips, K.-A. (2020) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41568-020-0266-x · Cited by 992 · see citing works
Self-citationAbdel-Razeq, H., & Mansour, R. (2026) · World Journal of Oncology · doi:10.14740/wjon2692
- Authors
- Phillips, K.-A., Milne, R. L., Rookus, M. A., Daly, M. B., Antoniou, A. C., Peock, S., Frost, D., Easton, D. F., Ellis, S., Friedlander, M. L., Buys, S. S., Andrieu, N., Noguès, C., Stoppa-Lyonnet, D., Bonadona, V., Pujol, P., McLachlan, S. A., John, E. M., Hooning, M. J., Seynaeve, C., Tollenaar, R. A. E. M., Goldgar, D. E., Terry, M. B., Caldes, T., Weideman, P. C., Andrulis, I. L., Singer, C. F., Birch, K., Simard, J., Southey, M. C., Olsson, H. L., Jakubowska, A., Olah, E., Gerdes, A.-M., Foretova, L., & Hopper, J. L.
- Affiliations
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Kelly-Anne Phillips, Sue Anne McLachlan, Prue C. Weideman, and Kate Birch, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre; Kelly-Anne Phillips, Roger L. Milne, Sue Anne McLachlan, Melissa C. Southey, and John L. Hopper, University of Melbourne; Sue Anne McLachlan, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria; Michael L. Friedlander, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia; Roger L. Milne, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre; Trinidad Caldes, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Instituto de Investigación...
- Lyon 1 Université (FR)
- Inserm (FR)
- Cancer Prevention Institute of California (US)
- ORCID
- Phillips, Kelly-Anne
- Milne, Roger L.
- Rookus, Matti A.
- Antoniou, Antonis C.
- Easton, Douglas F.
- Friedlander, Michael L.
- Buys, Saundra S.
- Andrieu, Nadine
- Noguès, Catherine
- Bonadona, Valérie
- Pujol, Pascal
- John, Esther M.
- Hooning, Maartje J.
- Tollenaar, Rob A.E.M.
- Terry, Mary Beth
- Weideman, Prue C.
- Andrulis, Irene L.
- Singer, Christian F.
- Simard, Jacques
- Southey, Melissa C.
- Jakubowska, Anna
- Gerdes, Anne-Marie
- Hopper, John L.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2013-09-01
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 25
- Pages
- 3091-3099
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- PMC
- PMC3753701
- OpenAlex
- W2100860810
- Cited by
- 171
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 4
- FWCI
- 16.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
- Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
- Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
- RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Georgetown University
- Cancer Care Ontario (U01 CA69467)
- Huntsman Cancer Institute (U01 CA69446)
- Ministère du Développement Économique, de l’Innovation et de l’Exportation (RD06/0020, C1287/A10118)
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
- Canadian Breast Cancer Research Alliance (019511, U01 CA69467)
- Cancer Research UK (11174, RD06/0020, C1287‐A10118, C1287, 10118, 11022, C1287/A11990)
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (RD06/0020, C1287/A10118)
- National Breast Cancer Foundation (RD06/0020, C1287/A10118)
- Cancer Australia (628333)
- University of Melbourne (U01 CA69638)
- Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (91109024)
- Fondation de France (RD06/0020, C1287/A10118)
- Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico
- National Institutes of Health (RD06/0020, C1287/A10118, CA164920)
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (C1287/A10118, 43822, RD06/0020)
- Medical Research Council (RD06/0020, C1287/A10118)
- National Health and Medical Research Council
- Instituto de Salud Carlos III (RD06/0020)
- European Regional Development Fund (CZ.1.05/2.1.00/03.0101)
- National Cancer Institute (U01CA069417, UM1CA164920, U01 CA69467, RD06/0020, CA164920, C1287/A10118)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › BRCA gene mutations in cancer
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Multiple and Secondary Primary Cancers
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Risks and Factors
- Keywords
- tamoxifen, contralateral breast cancer, BRCA1 mutation carriers, BRCA2 mutation carriers, hereditary breast cancer, adjuvant endocrine therapy, estrogen receptor status, bilateral oophorectomy, familial cancer risk
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Breast Neoplasms, Estrogen Antagonists, Female, Heterozygote, Humans, Middle Aged, Mutation, Risk Factors, Tamoxifen, Proportional Hazards Models, Genes, BRCA1, Genes, BRCA2
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review