Cited by 171BRCA gene mutations in cancerMultiple and Secondary Primary CancersCancer Risks and Factors

Tamoxifen and Risk of Contralateral Breast Cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers

Open access
Phillips, Kelly-Anne, Milne, Roger L., Rookus, Matti A., Daly, Mary B., Antoniou, Antonis C., Peock, Susan, Frost, Debra, Easton, Douglas F. +28 more·2013·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: To determine whether adjuvant tamoxifen treatment for breast cancer (BC) is associated with reduced contralateral breast cancer (CBC) risk for BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 mutation carriers. Methods: Analysis of pooled observational cohort data, self-reported at enrollment and at follow-up from the International BRCA1, and BRCA2 Carrier Cohort Study, Kathleen Cuningham Foundation Consortium for Research into Familial Breast Cancer, and Breast Cancer Family Registry. Eligible women were BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers diagnosed with unilateral BC since 1970 and no other invasive cancer or tamoxifen use before first BC. Hazard ratios (HRs) for CBC associated with tamoxifen use were estimated using Cox regression, adjusting for year and age of diagnosis, country, and bilateral oophorectomy and censoring at contralateral mastectomy, death, or loss to follow-up. Results: Of 1,583 BRCA1 and 881 BRCA2 mutation carriers, 383 (24%) and 454 (52%), respectively, took tamoxifen after first BC diagnosis. There were 520 CBCs over 20,104 person-years of observation. The adjusted HR estimates were 0.38 (95% CI, 0.27 to 0.55) and 0.33 (95% CI, 0.22 to 0.50) for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers, respectively. After left truncating at recruitment to the cohort, adjusted HR estimates were 0.58 (95% CI, 0.29 to 1.13) and 0.48 (95% CI, 0.22 to 1.05) based on 657 BRCA1 and 426 BRCA2 mutation carriers with 100 CBCs over 4,392 person-years of prospective follow-up. HRs did not differ by estrogen receptor status of the first BC (missing for 56% of cases). Conclusion: This study provides evidence that tamoxifen use is associated with a reduction in CBC risk for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Further follow-up of these cohorts will provide increased statistical power for future prospective analyses.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2012.47.8313

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Nelson HD, Fu R, Griffin JC, et al: Systematic review: Comparative effectiveness of medications to reduce risk for primary breast cancer. Ann Intern Med 151:703-715, W-226-235, 2009

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Phillips, K.-A., Milne, R. L., Rookus, M. A., Daly, M. B., Antoniou, A. C., Peock, S., Frost, D., Easton, D. F., Ellis, S., Friedlander, M. L., Buys, S. S., Andrieu, N., Noguès, C., Stoppa-Lyonnet, D., Bonadona, V., Pujol, P., McLachlan, S. A., John, E. M., Hooning, M. J., Seynaeve, C., Tollenaar, R. A. E. M., Goldgar, D. E., Terry, M. B., Caldes, T., Weideman, P. C., Andrulis, I. L., Singer, C. F., Birch, K., Simard, J., Southey, M. C., Olsson, H. L., Jakubowska, A., Olah, E., Gerdes, A.-M., Foretova, L., & Hopper, J. L.
Affiliations
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Kelly-Anne Phillips, Sue Anne McLachlan, Prue C. Weideman, and Kate Birch, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre; Kelly-Anne Phillips, Roger L. Milne, Sue Anne McLachlan, Melissa C. Southey, and John L. Hopper, University of Melbourne; Sue Anne McLachlan, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria; Michael L. Friedlander, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia; Roger L. Milne, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre; Trinidad Caldes, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Instituto de Investigación...
  • Lyon 1 Université (FR)
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Cancer Prevention Institute of California (US)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2013-09-01
Volume
31
Issue
25
Pages
3091-3099
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2100860810
Cited by
171
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 4
FWCI
16.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Georgetown University
  • Cancer Care Ontario (U01 CA69467)
  • Huntsman Cancer Institute (U01 CA69446)
  • Ministère du Développement Économique, de l’Innovation et de l’Exportation (RD06/0020, C1287/A10118)
  • Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
  • Canadian Breast Cancer Research Alliance (019511, U01 CA69467)
  • Cancer Research UK (11174, RD06/0020, C1287‐A10118, C1287, 10118, 11022, C1287/A11990)
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (RD06/0020, C1287/A10118)
  • National Breast Cancer Foundation (RD06/0020, C1287/A10118)
  • Cancer Australia (628333)
  • University of Melbourne (U01 CA69638)
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (91109024)
  • Fondation de France (RD06/0020, C1287/A10118)
  • Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico
  • National Institutes of Health (RD06/0020, C1287/A10118, CA164920)
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research (C1287/A10118, 43822, RD06/0020)
  • Medical Research Council (RD06/0020, C1287/A10118)
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
  • Instituto de Salud Carlos III (RD06/0020)
  • European Regional Development Fund (CZ.1.05/2.1.00/03.0101)
  • National Cancer Institute (U01CA069417, UM1CA164920, U01 CA69467, RD06/0020, CA164920, C1287/A10118)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › BRCA gene mutations in cancer
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Multiple and Secondary Primary Cancers
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Risks and Factors
Keywords
tamoxifen, contralateral breast cancer, BRCA1 mutation carriers, BRCA2 mutation carriers, hereditary breast cancer, adjuvant endocrine therapy, estrogen receptor status, bilateral oophorectomy, familial cancer risk
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Breast Neoplasms, Estrogen Antagonists, Female, Heterozygote, Humans, Middle Aged, Mutation, Risk Factors, Tamoxifen, Proportional Hazards Models, Genes, BRCA1, Genes, BRCA2

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review