Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 379

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Interim Cosmetic and Toxicity Results From RAPID: A Randomized Trial of Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation Using Three-Dimensional Conformal External Beam Radiation Therapy

Open access
Olivotto, Ivo A., Whelan, Timothy J., Parpia, Sameer, Kim, Do-Hoon, Berrang, Tanya, Truong, Pauline T., Kong, Iwa, Cochrane, Brandy, Nichol, Alan, Roy, Isabelle, Germain, Isabelle, Akra, Mohamed, Reed, Melanie, Fyles, Anthony, Trotter, Theresa, Perera, Francisco, Beckham, Wayne, Levine, Mark N., Julian, Jim A.·2013·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: To report interim cosmetic and toxicity results of a multicenter randomized trial comparing accelerated partial-breast irradiation (APBI) using three-dimensional conformal external beam radiation therapy (3D-CRT) with whole-breast irradiation (WBI). Patients and Methods: Women age > 40 years with invasive or in situ breast cancer ≤ 3 cm were randomly assigned after breast-conserving surgery to 3D-CRT APBI (38.5 Gy in 10 fractions twice daily) or WBI (42.5 Gy in 16 or 50 Gy in 25 daily fractions ± boost irradiation). The primary outcome was ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR). Secondary outcomes were cosmesis and toxicity. Adverse cosmesis was defined as a fair or poor global cosmetic score. After a planned interim cosmetic analysis, the data, safety, and monitoring committee recommended release of results. There have been too few IBTR events to trigger an efficacy analysis. Results: Between 2006 and 2011, 2,135 women were randomly assigned to 3D-CRT APBI or WBI. Median follow-up was 36 months. Adverse cosmesis at 3 years was increased among those treated with APBI compared with WBI as assessed by trained nurses (29% v 17%; P < .001), by patients (26% v 18%; P = .0022), and by physicians reviewing digital photographs (35% v 17%; P < .001). Grade 3 toxicities were rare in both treatment arms (1.4% v 0%), but grade 1 and 2 toxicities were increased among those who received APBI compared with WBI (P < .001). Conclusion: 3D-CRT APBI increased rates of adverse cosmesis and late radiation toxicity compared with standard WBI. Clinicians and patients are cautioned against the use of 3D-CRT APBI outside the context of a controlled trial.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2013.50.5511

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 22 references

Cited by

See all 379

Metadata

Authors
Olivotto, I. A., Whelan, T. J., Parpia, S., Kim, D.-H., Berrang, T., Truong, P. T., Kong, I., Cochrane, B., Nichol, A., Roy, I., Germain, I., Akra, M., Reed, M., Fyles, A., Trotter, T., Perera, F., Beckham, W., Levine, M. N., & Julian, J. A.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2013-11-10
Volume
31
Issue
32
Pages
4038-4045
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2115718867
Cited by
379
References
22
FWCI
15.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interim Cosmetic and Toxicity Results From RAPID: A Randomized Trial of Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation Using Three-Dimensional Conformal External Beam Radiation Therapy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2013.50.5511
The paper
Olivotto, I. A., Whelan, T. J., Parpia, S., Kim, D.-H., Berrang, T., Truong, P. T., Kong, I., Cochrane, B., Nichol, A., Roy, I., Germain, I., Akra, M., Reed, M., Fyles, A., Trotter, T., Perera, F., Beckham, W., Levine, M. N., & Julian, J. A. (2013). Interim Cosmetic and Toxicity Results From RAPID: A Randomized Trial of Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation Using Three-Dimensional Conformal External Beam Radiation Therapy. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2013.50.5511

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.