Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 356

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Gefitinib Versus Placebo in Completely Resected Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Results of the NCIC CTG BR19 Study

Open access
Goss, Glenwood D., O'Callaghan, Chris, Lorimer, Ian, Tsao, Ming-Sound, Masters, Gregory A., Jett, James, Edelman, Martin J., Lilenbaum, Rogerio, Choy, Hak, Khuri, Fadlo, Pisters, Katherine, Gandara, David, Kernstine, Kemp, Butts, Charles, Noble, Jonathan, Hensing, Thomas A., Rowland, Kendrith, Schiller, Joan, Ding, Keyue, Shepherd, Frances A.·2013·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: Survival of patients with completely resected non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is unsatisfactory, and in 2002, the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy was not established. This phase III study assessed the impact of postoperative adjuvant gefitinib on overall survival (OS). Patients and Methods: Patients with completely resected (stage IB, II, or IIIA) NSCLC stratified by stage, histology, sex, postoperative radiotherapy, and chemotherapy were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive gefitinib 250 mg per day or placebo for 2 years. Study end points were OS, disease-free survival (DFS), and toxicity. Results: As a result of early closure, 503 of 1,242 planned patients were randomly assigned (251 to gefitinib and 252 to placebo). Baseline factors were balanced between the arms. With a median of 4.7 years of follow-up (range, 0.1 to 6.3 years), there was no difference in OS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.24; 95% CI, 0.94 to 1.64; P = .14) or DFS (HR, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.93 to 1.61; P = .15) between the arms. Exploratory analyses demonstrated no DFS (HR, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.92 to 1.76; P = .14) or OS benefit (HR, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.90 to 1.71; P = .18) from gefitinib for 344 patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) wild-type tumors. Similarly, there was no DFS (HR, 1.84; 95% CI, 0.44 to 7.73; P = .395) or OS benefit (HR, 3.16; 95% CI, 0.61 to 16.45; P = .15) from gefitinib for the 15 patients with EGFR mutation-positive tumors. Adverse events were those expected with an EGFR inhibitor. Serious adverse events occurred in ≤ 5% of patients, except infection, fatigue, and pain. One patient in each arm had fatal pneumonitis. Conclusion: Although the trial closed prematurely and definitive statements regarding the efficacy of adjuvant gefitinib cannot be made, these results indicate that it is unlikely to be of benefit.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2013.51.1816

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

See all 356

Metadata

Authors
Goss, G. D., O'Callaghan, C., Lorimer, I., Tsao, M.-S., Masters, G. A., Jett, J., Edelman, M. J., Lilenbaum, R., Choy, H., Khuri, F., Pisters, K., Gandara, D., Kernstine, K., Butts, C., Noble, J., Hensing, T. A., Rowland, K., Schiller, J., Ding, K., & Shepherd, F. A.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2013-09-20
Volume
31
Issue
27
Pages
3320-3326
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2102625113
Cited by
356
References
7
FWCI
26.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gefitinib Versus Placebo in Completely Resected Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Results of the NCIC CTG BR19 Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2013.51.1816
The paper
Goss, G. D., O'Callaghan, C., Lorimer, I., Tsao, M.-S., Masters, G. A., Jett, J., Edelman, M. J., Lilenbaum, R., Choy, H., Khuri, F., Pisters, K., Gandara, D., Kernstine, K., Butts, C., Noble, J., Hensing, T. A., Rowland, K., Schiller, J., Ding, K., & Shepherd, F. A. (2013). Gefitinib Versus Placebo in Completely Resected Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Results of the NCIC CTG BR19 Study. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2013.51.1816

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.