Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 321

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Circulating Tumor Cell Counts Are Prognostic of Overall Survival in SWOG S0421: A Phase III Trial of Docetaxel With or Without Atrasentan for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

Open access
Goldkorn, Amir, Ely, Benjamin, Quinn, David I., Tangen, Catherine M., Fink, Louis M., Xu, Tong, Twardowski, Przemyslaw, Van Veldhuizen, Peter J., Agarwal, Neeraj, Carducci, Michael A., Monk, J. Paul, Datar, Ram H., Garzotto, Mark, Mack, Philip C., Lara, Primo, Higano, Celestia S., Hussain, Maha, Thompson, Ian Murchie, Cote, Richard J., Vogelzang, Nicholas J.·2014·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: Circulating tumor cell (CTC) enumeration has not been prospectively validated in standard first-line docetaxel treatment for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. We assessed the prognostic value of CTCs for overall survival (OS) and disease response in S0421, a phase III trial of docetaxel plus prednisone with or without atrasentan. Patients and Methods: CTCs were enumerated at baseline (day 0) and before cycle two (day 21) using CellSearch. Baseline counts and changes in counts from day 0 to 21 were evaluated for association with OS, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and RECIST response using Cox regression as well as receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves, integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) analysis, and regression trees. Results: Median day-0 CTC count was five cells per 7.5 mL, and CTCs < versus ≥ five per 7.5 mL were significantly associated with baseline PSA, bone pain, liver disease, hemoglobin, alkaline phosphatase, and subsequent PSA and RECIST response. Median OS was 26 months for < five versus 13 months for ≥ five CTCs per 7.5 mL at day 0 (hazard ratio [HR], 2.74 [adjusting for covariates]). ROC curves had higher areas under the curve for day-0 CTCs than for PSA, and IDI analysis showed that adding day-0 CTCs to baseline PSA and other covariates increased predictive accuracy for survival by 8% to 10%. Regression trees yielded new prognostic subgroups, and rising CTC count from day 0 to 21 was associated with shorter OS (HR, 2.55). Conclusion: These data validate the prognostic utility of CTC enumeration in a large docetaxel-based prospective cohort. Baseline CTC counts were prognostic, and rising CTCs at 3 weeks heralded significantly worse OS, potentially serving as an early metric to help redirect and optimize therapy in this clinical setting.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2013.51.7417

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 321

Metadata

Authors
Goldkorn, A., Ely, B., Quinn, D. I., Tangen, C. M., Fink, L. M., Xu, T., Twardowski, P., Van Veldhuizen, P. J., Agarwal, N., Carducci, M. A., Monk, J. P., Datar, R. H., Garzotto, M., Mack, P. C., Lara, P., Higano, C. S., Hussain, M., Thompson, I. M., Cote, R. J., & Vogelzang, N. J.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2014-04-10
Volume
32
Issue
11
Pages
1136-1142
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2103793201
Cited by
321
References
3
FWCI
32.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Circulating Tumor Cell Counts Are Prognostic of Overall Survival in SWOG S0421: A Phase III Trial of Docetaxel With or Without Atrasentan for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2013.51.7417
The paper
Goldkorn, A., Ely, B., Quinn, D. I., Tangen, C. M., Fink, L. M., Xu, T., Twardowski, P., Van Veldhuizen, P. J., Agarwal, N., Carducci, M. A., Monk, J. P., Datar, R. H., Garzotto, M., Mack, P. C., Lara, P., Higano, C. S., Hussain, M., Thompson, I. M., Cote, R. J., & Vogelzang, N. J. (2014). Circulating Tumor Cell Counts Are Prognostic of Overall Survival in SWOG S0421: A Phase III Trial of Docetaxel With or Without Atrasentan for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2013.51.7417

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.