Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 423

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comorbidity-Age Index: A Clinical Measure of Biologic Age Before Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Open access
Sorror, Mohamed L., Storb, Rainer F., Sandmaier, Brenda M., Maziarz, Richard T., Pulsipher, Michael A., Maris, Michael B., Bhatia, Smita, Ostronoff, Fabiana, Deeg, H. Joachim, Syrjala, Karen L., Estey, Elihu, Maloney, David G., Appelbaum, Frederick R., Martin, Paul J., Storer, Barry E.·2014·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: Age has long been used as a major factor for assessing suitability for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). The HCT-comorbidity index (HCT-CI) was developed as a measure of health status to predict mortality risk after HCT. Whether age, comorbidities, or both should guide decision making for HCT is unknown. Patients and Methods: Data from 3,033 consecutive recipients of HLA-matched grafts from five institutions contributed to this analysis. Patients were randomly divided into a training set to develop weights for age intervals and a validation set to assess the performance of prognostic models. Results: In the training set, patients age 20 to 39 years, 40 to 49 years, 50 to 59 years, and ≥ 60 years had hazard ratios for nonrelapse mortality (NRM) of 1.21 (P = .29), 1.48 (P = .04), 1.75 (P = .004), and 1.84 (P = .005), respectively, compared with those age younger than 20 years. Consequently, age ≥ 40 years was assigned a weight of 1 to be added to the HCT-CI to constitute a composite comorbidity/age index. In the validation set, the composite comorbidity/age score had statistically significantly higher c-statistic estimates for prediction of NRM (0.664 v 0.556; P < .001) and survival (0.682 v 0.560; P < .001) compared with age, respectively. Patients with comorbidity/age scores of 0 to 2 had comparable mortality risks regardless of conditioning regimens. Patients with scores of 3 to 4 and ≥ 5 had statistically significant higher mortality risks after high-dose versus nonmyeloablative regimens. Conclusion: Age is a poor prognostic factor. The proposed composite measure allows integration of both comorbidities and age into clinical decision making and comparative-effectiveness research of HCT.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2013.53.8157

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 423

Metadata

Authors
Sorror, M. L., Storb, R. F., Sandmaier, B. M., Maziarz, R. T., Pulsipher, M. A., Maris, M. B., Bhatia, S., Ostronoff, F., Deeg, H. J., Syrjala, K. L., Estey, E., Maloney, D. G., Appelbaum, F. R., Martin, P. J., & Storer, B. E.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2014-10-10
Volume
32
Issue
29
Pages
3249-3256
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2067831127
Cited by
423
References
2
FWCI
24.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comorbidity-Age Index: A Clinical Measure of Biologic Age Before Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2013.53.8157
The paper
Sorror, M. L., Storb, R. F., Sandmaier, B. M., Maziarz, R. T., Pulsipher, M. A., Maris, M. B., Bhatia, S., Ostronoff, F., Deeg, H. J., Syrjala, K. L., Estey, E., Maloney, D. G., Appelbaum, F. R., Martin, P. J., & Storer, B. E. (2014). Comorbidity-Age Index: A Clinical Measure of Biologic Age Before Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2013.53.8157

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.