Cited by 19Cancer Cells and MetastasisMesenchymal stem cell researchHematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

A phase I extension study of BBI608, a first-in-class cancer stem cell (CSC) inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors

Jonker, Derek J., Stephenson, Joe, Edenfield, William Jeffery, Supko, Jeffrey G., Li, Youzhi, Li, Wei, Hitron, Matthew, Leggett, David +2 more·2014·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

2546 Background: BBI608, an orally-administered first-in-class cancer stemness inhibitor, blocks CSC self-renewal and induces cell death in CSC as well as non-stem cancer cells by inhibiting Stat3, β-catenin, and Nanog pathways, and has shown potent anti-tumor and anti-metastatic activities pre-clinically. In a phase 1 study, BBI608 demonstrated tolerability as well as signs of anti-cancer activity in patients with solid tumors. This phase 1 extension study evaluated a formulation designed for pivotal trials to determine pharmacokinetics (PK) in patients with advanced cancer. Methods: Day 1, patients received a single 500mg dose of the original BBI608 formulation (DP1). Day 4 and 8, a higher strength capsule designed for pivotal trials (DP2A) was given with fasting then fed conditions. DP2A was then administered daily until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Endpoints were safety, PK and preliminary anticancer activity. Results: DP2A was evaluated in 24 patients. No significant difference in plasma exposure between DP1 and DP2A, and no significant food effect were observed. Nine patients received BBI608 DP2A 4 h apart (DP2A-4h) only, and 15 patients received BBI608 DP2A 500 mg bid 12 h apart (DP2A-12h). Despite PK equivalence to DP1, DP2A-4 h was associated with higher frequency of gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events (AE) than observed in the prior study, including diarrhea, abdominal cramps, nausea/vomiting, anorexia, and fatigue. In contrast, DP2A-12 h had fewer…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2014.32.15_suppl.2546

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jonker, D. J., Stephenson, J., Edenfield, W. J., Supko, J. G., Li, Y., Li, W., Hitron, M., Leggett, D., Kerstein, D., & Li, C.
Affiliations
  • Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (CA)
  • Institute for Translational Oncology Research, Greenville, SC
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
  • Boston Biomedical (United States) (US)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2014-05-20
Volume
32
Issue
15_suppl
Pages
2546-2546
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2481032118
Cited by
19
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3
Type
conference abstract
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Cells and Metastasis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Mesenchymal stem cell research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Keywords
advanced solid tumors, pharmacokinetics, dosing regimen, gastrointestinal adverse effects, colorectal cancer, ovarian cancer, STAT3 inhibition, β-catenin signaling, Nanog, food effect, anticancer activity, safety and tolerability, progression-free survival, overall survival, stable disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review