Cited by 509Pain Management and Opioid UseAnesthesia and Pain ManagementPediatric Pain Management Techniques

Quality of Cancer Pain Management: An Update of a Systematic Review of Undertreatment of Patients With Cancer

Greco, Maria Teresa, Roberto, Anna, Corli, Oscar, Deandrea, Silvia, Bandieri, Elena, Cavuto, Silvio, Apolone, Giovanni·2014·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: Pain is a frequent symptom in patients with cancer, with substantial impact. Despite the availability of opioids and updated guidelines from reliable leading societies, undertreatment is still frequent. Methods: We updated a systematic review published in 2008, which showed that according to the Pain Management Index (PMI), 43.4% of patients with cancer were undertreated. This review included observational and experimental studies reporting negative PMI scores for adults with cancer and pain published from 2007 to 2013 and retrieved through MEDLINE, Embase, and Google Scholar. To detect any temporal trend and identify potential determinants of undertreatment, we compared articles published before and after 2007 with univariable, multivariable, and sensitivity analyses. Results: In the new set of 20 articles published from 2007 to 2013, there was a decrease in undertreatment of approximately 25% (from 43.4 to 31.8%). In the whole sample, the proportion of undertreated patients fell from 2007 to 2013, and an association was confirmed between negative PMI score, economic level, and nonspecific setting for cancer pain. Sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of results. Conclusion: Analysis of 46 articles published from 1994 to 2013 using the PMI to assess the adequacy of analgesic therapy suggests the quality of pharmacologic pain management has improved. However, approximately one third of patients still do not receive pain medication proportional to their pain intensity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2014.56.0383

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Greco, M. T., Roberto, A., Corli, O., Deandrea, S., Bandieri, E., Cavuto, S., & Apolone, G.
Affiliations
  • Maria Teresa Greco, University of Milan; Maria Teresa Greco, Anna Roberto, and Oscar Corli, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche “Mario Negri,” Milan; Silvia Deandrea, European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Ispra; Elena Bandieri, Azienda Unita Sanitaria Locale di Modena, Modena; and Silvio Cavuto and Giovanni Apolone, IRCCS, Arcispedale “S. Maria Nuova,” Reggio Emilia, Italy.
  • University of Milan (IT)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2014-12-20
Volume
32
Issue
36
Pages
4149-4154
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W1973439845
Cited by
509
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 55 · 2019: 72 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 45 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 17
FWCI
5.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Joint Research Centre (European Commission) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Anesthesia and Pain Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
Keywords
cancer pain, undertreatment, Pain Management Index, opioids, socioeconomic status, pain intensity
MeSH terms
Humans, Neoplasms, Intractable Pain, Quality of Health Care, Pain Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review