The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Impact of the Addition of Carboplatin and/or Bevacizumab to Neoadjuvant Once-per-Week Paclitaxel Followed by Dose-Dense Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide on Pathologic Complete Response Rates in Stage II to III Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: CALGB 40603 (Alliance)
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: One third of patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) achieve pathologic complete response (pCR) with standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). CALGB 40603 (Alliance), a 2 × 2 factorial, open-label, randomized phase II trial, evaluated the impact of adding carboplatin and/or bevacizumab. Patients and Methods: Patients (N = 443) with stage II to III TNBC received paclitaxel 80 mg/m 2 once per week (wP) for 12 weeks, followed by doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide once every 2 weeks (ddAC) for four cycles, and were randomly assigned to concurrent carboplatin (area under curve 6) once every 3 weeks for four cycles and/or bevacizumab 10 mg/kg once every 2 weeks for nine cycles. Effects of adding these agents on pCR breast (ypT0/is), pCR breast/axilla (ypT0/isN0), treatment delivery, and toxicities were analyzed. Results: Patients assigned to either carboplatin or bevacizumab were less likely to complete wP and ddAC without skipped doses, dose modification, or early discontinuation resulting from toxicity. Grade ≥ 3 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were more common with carboplatin, as were hypertension, infection, thromboembolic events, bleeding, and postoperative complications with bevacizumab. Employing one-sided P values, addition of either carboplatin (60% v 44%; P = .0018) or bevacizumab (59% v 48%; P = .0089) significantly increased pCR breast, whereas only carboplatin (54% v 41%; P = .0029) significantly raised pCR breast/axilla. More-than-additive interactions between the two agents could not be demonstrated. Conclusion: In stage II to III TNBC, addition of either carboplatin or bevacizumab to NACT increased pCR rates, but whether this will improve relapse-free or overall survival is unknown. Given results from recently reported adjuvant trials, further investigation of bevacizumab in this setting is unlikely, but the role of carboplatin could be evaluated in definitive studies, ideally limited to biologically defined patient subsets most likely to benefit from this agent.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lehmann, B. D., Bauer, J. A., Chen, X., Sanders, M. E., Chakravarthy, A. B., Shyr, Y., & Pietenpol, J. A. (2011) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci45014 · Cited by 5,592
Repeated observation of breast tumor subtypes in independent gene expression data sets
Sørlie, T., Tibshirani, R., Parker, J., Hastie, T., Marron, J. S., Nobel, A., Deng, S., Johnsen, H., Pesich, R., Geisler, S., et al. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0932692100 · Cited by 5,429
Self-citationCortazar, P., Zhang, L., Untch, M., Mehta, K., Costantino, J. P., Wolmark, N., Bonnefoi, H., Cameron, D., Gianni, L., Valagussa, P., et al. (2014) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(13)62422-8 · Cited by 4,742
Self-citationFoulkes, W. D., Smith, I. E., & Reis-Filho, J. S. (2010) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra1001389 · Cited by 4,157
Paclitaxel plus Bevacizumab versus Paclitaxel Alone for Metastatic Breast Cancer
Miller, K., Wang, M., Gralow, J., Dickler, M., Cobleigh, M., Perez, E. A., Shenkier, T., Cella, D., & Davidson, N. E. (2007) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa072113 · Cited by 3,081
Liedtke, C., Mazouni, C., Hess, K. R., André, F., Tordai, A., Mejia, J. A., Symmans, W. F., Gonzalez-Angulo, A. M., Hennessy, B., Green, M., et al. (2008) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2007.14.4147 · Cited by 2,892
Measurement of Residual Breast Cancer Burden to Predict Survival After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
Symmans, W. F., Peintinger, F., Hatzis, C., Rajan, R., Kuerer, H., Valero, V., Assad, L., Poniecka, A., Hennessy, B., Green, M., et al. (2007) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2007.10.6823 · Cited by 1,654
von Minckwitz, G., Schneeweiss, A., Loibl, S., Salat, C., Denkert, C., Rezai, M., Blohmer, J. U., Jackisch, C., Paepke, S., Gerber, B., et al. (2014) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(14)70160-3 · Cited by 1,022
Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Cisplatin in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
Silver, D. P., Richardson, A. L., Eklund, A. C., Wang, Z. C., Szallasi, Z., Li, Q., Juul, N., Leong, C.-O., Calogrias, D., Buraimoh, A., et al. (2010) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2009.22.4725 · Cited by 981
Self-citationBerry, D. A., Cirrincione, C., Henderson, I. C., Citron, M. L., Budman, D. R., Goldstein, L. J., Martino, S., Perez, E. A., Muss, H. B., Norton, L., et al. (2006) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.295.14.1658 · Cited by 731
Self-citation
Cited by
Pembrolizumab for Early Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
Schmid, P., Cortes, J., Pusztai, L., McArthur, H., Kümmel, S., Bergh, J., Denkert, C., Park, Y. H., Hui, R., Harbeck, N., et al. (2020) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1910549 · Cited by 3,270
Harbeck, N., Penault-Llorca, F., Cortes, J., Gnant, M., Houssami, N., Poortmans, P., Ruddy, K., Tsang, J., & Cardoso, F. (2019) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/s41572-019-0111-2 · Cited by 3,024
Triple-negative breast cancer: challenges and opportunities of a heterogeneous disease
Bianchini, G., Balko, J. M., Mayer, I. A., Sanders, M. E., & Gianni, L. (2016) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2016.66 · Cited by 3,079
Early breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up
Cardoso, F., Kyriakides, S., Ohno, S., Penault-Llorca, F., Poortmans, P., Rubio, I. T., Zackrisson, S., & Senkus, E. (2019) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdz173 · Cited by 2,214
Loibl, S., Poortmans, P., Morrow, M., Denkert, C., & Curigliano, G. (2021) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)32381-3 · Cited by 1,648
Metadata
- Authors
- Sikov, W. M., Berry, D. A., Perou, C. M., Singh, B., Cirrincione, C. T., Tolaney, S. M., Kuzma, C. S., Pluard, T. J., Somlo, G., Port, E. R., Golshan, M., Bellon, J. R., Collyar, D., Hahn, O. M., Carey, L. A., Hudis, C. A., & Winer, E. P.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2015-01-01
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 13-21
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2096745115
- Cited by
- 1,013
- References
- 24
- FWCI
- 25.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Impact of the Addition of Carboplatin and/or Bevacizumab to Neoadjuvant Once-per-Week Paclitaxel Followed by Dose-Dense Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide on Pathologic Complete Response Rates in Stage II to III Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: CALGB 40603 (Alliance). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2014.57.0572
- The paper
- Sikov, W. M., Berry, D. A., Perou, C. M., Singh, B., Cirrincione, C. T., Tolaney, S. M., Kuzma, C. S., Pluard, T. J., Somlo, G., Port, E. R., Golshan, M., Bellon, J. R., Collyar, D., Hahn, O. M., Carey, L. A., Hudis, C. A., & Winer, E. P. (2015). Impact of the Addition of Carboplatin and/or Bevacizumab to Neoadjuvant Once-per-Week Paclitaxel Followed by Dose-Dense Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide on Pathologic Complete Response Rates in Stage II to III Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: CALGB 40603 (Alliance). Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2014.57.0572
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
