Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 981

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Cisplatin in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Open access
Silver, Daniel P., Richardson, Andrea L., Eklund, Aron C., Wang, Zhigang C., Szallasi, Zoltan, Li, Qiyuan, Juul, Nicolai, Leong, Chee-Onn, Calogrias, Diana, Buraimoh, Ayodele, Fatima, Aquila, Gelman, Rebecca S., Ryan, Paula D., Tung, Nadine M., De Nicolo, Arcangela, Ganesan, Shridar, Miron, Alexander, Colin, Christian, Sgroi, Dennis C., Ellisen, Leif W., Winer, Eric P., Garber, Judy E.·2010·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: Cisplatin is a chemotherapeutic agent not used routinely for breast cancer treatment. As a DNA cross-linking agent, cisplatin may be effective treatment for hereditary BRCA1-mutated breast cancers. Because sporadic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and BRCA1-associated breast cancer share features suggesting common pathogenesis, we conducted a neoadjuvant trial of cisplatin in TNBC and explored specific biomarkers to identify predictors of response. Patients and Methods: Twenty-eight women with stage II or III breast cancers lacking estrogen and progesterone receptors and HER2/Neu (TNBC) were enrolled and treated with four cycles of cisplatin at 75 mg/m 2 every 21 days. After definitive surgery, patients received standard adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy per their treating physicians. Clinical and pathologic treatment response were assessed, and pretreatment tumor samples were evaluated for selected biomarkers. Results: Six (22%) of 28 patients achieved pathologic complete responses, including both patients with BRCA1 germline mutations;18 (64%) patients had a clinical complete or partial response. Fourteen (50%) patients showed good pathologic responses (Miller-Payne score of 3, 4, or 5), 10 had minor responses (Miller-Payne score of 1 or 2), and four (14%) progressed. All TNBCs clustered with reference basal-like tumors by hierarchical clustering. Factors associated with good cisplatin response include young age (P = .001), low BRCA1 mRNA expression (P = .03), BRCA1 promoter methylation (P = .04), p53 nonsense or frameshift mutations (P = .01), and a gene expression signature of E2F3 activation (P = .03). Conclusion: Single-agent cisplatin induced response in a subset of patients with TNBC. Decreased BRCA1 expression may identify subsets of TNBCs that are cisplatin sensitive. Other biomarkers show promise in predicting cisplatin response.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2009.22.4725

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 981

Metadata

Authors
Silver, D. P., Richardson, A. L., Eklund, A. C., Wang, Z. C., Szallasi, Z., Li, Q., Juul, N., Leong, C.-O., Calogrias, D., Buraimoh, A., Fatima, A., Gelman, R. S., Ryan, P. D., Tung, N. M., De Nicolo, A., Ganesan, S., Miron, A., Colin, C., Sgroi, D. C., Ellisen, L. W., Winer, E. P., & Garber, J. E.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2010-03-01
Volume
28
Issue
7
Pages
1145-1153
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2142486051
Cited by
981
References
3
FWCI
25.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Cisplatin in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2009.22.4725
The paper
Silver, D. P., Richardson, A. L., Eklund, A. C., Wang, Z. C., Szallasi, Z., Li, Q., Juul, N., Leong, C.-O., Calogrias, D., Buraimoh, A., Fatima, A., Gelman, R. S., Ryan, P. D., Tung, N. M., De Nicolo, A., Ganesan, S., Miron, A., Colin, C., Sgroi, D. C., . . . Garber, J. E. (2010). Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Cisplatin in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2009.22.4725

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.