The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Cisplatin in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: Cisplatin is a chemotherapeutic agent not used routinely for breast cancer treatment. As a DNA cross-linking agent, cisplatin may be effective treatment for hereditary BRCA1-mutated breast cancers. Because sporadic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and BRCA1-associated breast cancer share features suggesting common pathogenesis, we conducted a neoadjuvant trial of cisplatin in TNBC and explored specific biomarkers to identify predictors of response. Patients and Methods: Twenty-eight women with stage II or III breast cancers lacking estrogen and progesterone receptors and HER2/Neu (TNBC) were enrolled and treated with four cycles of cisplatin at 75 mg/m 2 every 21 days. After definitive surgery, patients received standard adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy per their treating physicians. Clinical and pathologic treatment response were assessed, and pretreatment tumor samples were evaluated for selected biomarkers. Results: Six (22%) of 28 patients achieved pathologic complete responses, including both patients with BRCA1 germline mutations;18 (64%) patients had a clinical complete or partial response. Fourteen (50%) patients showed good pathologic responses (Miller-Payne score of 3, 4, or 5), 10 had minor responses (Miller-Payne score of 1 or 2), and four (14%) progressed. All TNBCs clustered with reference basal-like tumors by hierarchical clustering. Factors associated with good cisplatin response include young age (P = .001), low BRCA1 mRNA expression (P = .03), BRCA1 promoter methylation (P = .04), p53 nonsense or frameshift mutations (P = .01), and a gene expression signature of E2F3 activation (P = .03). Conclusion: Single-agent cisplatin induced response in a subset of patients with TNBC. Decreased BRCA1 expression may identify subsets of TNBCs that are cisplatin sensitive. Other biomarkers show promise in predicting cisplatin response.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Survival and tumour characteristics of breast-cancer patients with germline mutations of BRCA1
Verhoog, L., Brekelmans, C., Seynaeve, C., van den Bosch, L., Dahmen, G., van Geel, A., Tilanus-Linthorst, M., Bartels, C., Wagner, A., van den Ouweland, A., et al. (1998) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(97)07065-7 · Cited by 452
Genetic Analysis of BRCA1 Function in a Defined Tumor Cell Line
Scully, R., Ganesan, S., Vlasakova, K., Chen, J., Socolovsky, M., & Livingston, D. M. (1999) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80238-5 · Cited by 359
Self-citationMutational spectrum of p53 mutations in primary breast and ovarian tumors
Feki, A., & Irminger-Finger, I. (2004) · Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology · doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2004.07.002 · Cited by 139
Cited by
Nishimura, R., Osako, T., Nishiyama, Y., Tashima, R., Nakano, M., Fujisue, M., Toyozumi, Y., & Arima, N. (2013) · Oncology · doi:10.1159/000353099 · Cited by 13,166
Lehmann, B. D., Bauer, J. A., Chen, X., Sanders, M. E., Chakravarthy, A. B., Shyr, Y., & Pietenpol, J. A. (2011) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci45014 · Cited by 5,592
Triple-negative breast cancer: challenges and opportunities of a heterogeneous disease
Bianchini, G., Balko, J. M., Mayer, I. A., Sanders, M. E., & Gianni, L. (2016) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2016.66 · Cited by 3,079
Telli, M. L., Timms, K. M., Reid, J., Hennessy, B., Mills, G. B., Jensen, K. C., Szallasi, Z., Barry, W. T., Winer, E. P., Tung, N. M., et al. (2016) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-15-2477 · Cited by 1,136
Self-citationBouwman, P., Aly, A., Escandell, J. M., Pieterse, M., Bartkova, J., van der Gulden, H., Hiddingh, S., Thanasoula, M., Kulkarni, A., Yang, Q., et al. (2010) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/nsmb.1831 · Cited by 1,001
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Silver, D. P., Richardson, A. L., Eklund, A. C., Wang, Z. C., Szallasi, Z., Li, Q., Juul, N., Leong, C.-O., Calogrias, D., Buraimoh, A., Fatima, A., Gelman, R. S., Ryan, P. D., Tung, N. M., De Nicolo, A., Ganesan, S., Miron, A., Colin, C., Sgroi, D. C., Ellisen, L. W., Winer, E. P., & Garber, J. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2010-03-01
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1145-1153
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2142486051
- Cited by
- 981
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 25.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Cisplatin in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2009.22.4725
- The paper
- Silver, D. P., Richardson, A. L., Eklund, A. C., Wang, Z. C., Szallasi, Z., Li, Q., Juul, N., Leong, C.-O., Calogrias, D., Buraimoh, A., Fatima, A., Gelman, R. S., Ryan, P. D., Tung, N. M., De Nicolo, A., Ganesan, S., Miron, A., Colin, C., Sgroi, D. C., . . . Garber, J. E. (2010). Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Cisplatin in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2009.22.4725
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.