Cited by 281Lung Cancer Treatments and MutationsLung Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentCancer Genomics and Diagnostics

Molecular Testing for Selection of Patients With Lung Cancer for Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor and Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: American Society of Clinical Oncology Endorsement of the College of American Pathologists/International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer/Association for Molecular Pathology Guideline

Open access
Leighl, Natasha B., Rekhtman, Natasha, Biermann, William A., Huang, James, Mino-Kenudson, Mari, Ramalingam, Suresh S., West, Howard, Whitlock, Sara +1 more·2014·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: The College of American Pathologists (CAP), the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC), and the Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP) guideline on molecular testing for the selection of patients with lung cancer for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitors was considered for endorsement. Methods: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) staff reviewed the CAP/IASLC/AMP guideline for developmental rigor; an ASCO ad hoc review panel of experts reviewed the guideline content. Results: The ASCO panel concurred that the recommendations are clear, thorough, and based on the most relevant scientific evidence in this content area and present options that will be acceptable to patients. The CAP/IASLC/AMP guideline comprises 37 recommendations (evidence grade A or B), expert consensus opinions, or suggestions that address the following five principal questions: (1) When should molecular testing be performed? (2) How should EGFR testing be performed? (3) How should ALK testing be performed? (4) Should other genes be routinely tested in lung adenocarcinoma? (5) How should molecular testing be implemented and operationalized? Conclusion: The ASCO review panel endorses the CAP/IASLC/AMP guideline. This guideline represents an important advance toward standardization of EGFR and ALK testing practices and is of major clinical relevance in advancing the care of patients with lung cancer. In the Discussion section, the ASCO review panel highlights three evolving areas: advances in ALK testing methodology, considerations for selecting appropriate populations for molecular testing, and emergence of other targetable molecular alterations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2014.57.3055

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leighl, N. B., Rekhtman, N., Biermann, W. A., Huang, J., Mino-Kenudson, M., Ramalingam, S. S., West, H., Whitlock, S., & Somerfield, M. R.
Affiliations
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
  • American Society of Clinical Oncology (US)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2014-11-10
Volume
32
Issue
32
Pages
3673-3679
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2140832617
Cited by
281
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 47 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 48 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 1
FWCI
34.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Keywords
lung cancer, molecular testing, EGFR, anaplastic lymphoma kinase, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, targeted therapy selection, lung adenocarcinoma
MeSH terms
Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase, Genetic Testing, Humans, Immunohistochemistry, Lung Neoplasms, Medical Oncology, Mutation, Pathology, Clinical, Polymerase Chain Reaction, In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases, ErbB Receptors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review