The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Does a Recent Cancer Diagnosis Predict Smoking Cessation? An Analysis From a Large Prospective US Cohort
Abstract
PURPOSE: Quitting smoking provides important health benefits to patients with cancer. A cancer diagnosis may motivate quitting-potentially providing a teachable moment in which oncologists can encourage and assist patients to quit-but little is known about whether a recent cancer diagnosis (including diagnosis of a cancer that is less strongly linked to smoking) is associated with increased quitting. METHODS: Cancer Prevention Study-II Nutrition Cohort participants reported smoking status at enrollment in 1992 to 1993 and approximately biennially through 2009. Quit rates of smokers diagnosed with cancer during 2- and 4-year intervals were compared with those of smokers not diagnosed with cancer (12,182 and 12,538 smokers in 2- and 4-year analyses, respectively). Cancers likely to cause physical limitations or symptoms that could influence smoking (cancers of the lung, head and neck, esophagus, or any metastatic cancer) were excluded. Logistic regressions calculated quit rates controlling for age, sex, survey year, cardiovascular disease, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. RESULTS: The 2-year quit rate was higher among the 772 smokers who were diagnosed with cancer (31.3%; 95% CI, 28.0% to 34.5%) than among smokers not diagnosed with cancer (19.5%; 95% CI, 19.0% to 19.9%). A similar difference was observed for 4-year quit rates (43.0% v 33.8%). Results were similar by cancer site and stage. CONCLUSION: A diagnosis of cancer, even a cancer not strongly related to smoking and with a relatively good prognosis, may be associated with increased quitting that is sustained well after diagnosis. Results support the hypothesis that a cancer diagnosis presents a teachable moment that can be capitalized on to promote cessation.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“it is clear that it is a time where people can be more prone to change, since it could be interpreted as a “wake-up call” to adopt a more healthy lifestyle even when that intention is not translated into real changes [86,87].”
From Key Factors Associated with Adherence to Physical Exercise in Patients with Chronic Diseases and Older Adults: An Umbrella Review (2021) · cites this paper as [87]
Citations
Cites
(1968) · American Association of Industrial Nurses Journal · doi:10.1177/216507996801601208 · Cited by 8,811
The Health consequences of smoking—50 years of progress : a report of the Surgeon General
Lushniak, B. D., Samet, J. M., Pechacek, T. F., Norman, L., & Taylor, P. A. (2014) · Cited by 4,990
The Health Consequences of Smoking -- 50 Years of progress: A Report of the Surgeon General
General, U. S. S. (2014) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e510072014-001 · Cited by 3,368
The collective dynamics of smoking in a large social network
Christakis, N. A., & Fowler, J. H. (2008) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsa0706154 · Cited by 2,390
Courtney, R. J. (2015) · Drug and Alcohol Review · doi:10.1111/dar.12309 · Cited by 1,438
Cancer: Principles and Practice of Oncology.
(1986) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-104-1-142_4 · Cited by 1,074
Assessing outcome in smoking cessation studies.
Velicer, W. F., Prochaska, J. O., Rossi, J. S., & Snow, M. G. (1992) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.111.1.23 · Cited by 833
The American Cancer Society Cancer Prevention Study II Nutrition Cohort
Calle, E. E., Rodriguez, C., Jacobs, E. J., Almon, M., Chao, A., McCullough, M. L., Feigelson, H. S., & Thun, M. J. (2002) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.10197 · Cited by 492
The American Cancer Society Cancer Prevention Study II Nutrition Cohort
Calle, E. E., Rodríguez, C., Jacobs, E. J., Almon, M., Chao, A., McCullough, M. L., Feigelson, H. S., & Thun, M. J. (2002) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.101970 · Cited by 422
Successes and failures of the teachable moment
Gritz, E. R., Fingeret, M. C., Vidrine, D. J., Lazev, A. B., Mehta, N. V., & Reece, G. P. (2005) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.21598 · Cited by 361
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- American Cancer Society, 2014, Cancer Facts and Figures 2014
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Collado-Mateo, D., Lavín-Pérez, A. M., Peñacoba, C., Del Coso, J., Leyton-Román, M., Luque-Casado, A., Gasque, P., Fernández-del-Olmo, M. Á., & Amado-Alonso, D. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18042023 · Cited by 791
“Although the implications of diagnosis are still controversial, it is clear that it is a time where people can be more prone to change, since it could be interpreted as a “wake-up call” to adopt a more healthy lifestyle even when that intention is not translated into real changes [86,87].”
BackgroundSmoking cessation, version 1.2016, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology
Shields, P. G., Herbst, R. S., Arenberg, D., Benowitz, N. L., Bierut, L., Luckart, J. B., Cinciripini, P., Collins, B., David, S., Davis, J., et al. (2016) · Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network · doi:10.6004/jnccn.2016.0152 · Cited by 146
Smoking Behaviors in Survivors of Smoking-Related and Non–Smoking-Related Cancers
Gritz, E. R., Talluri, R., Domgue, J. F., Tamí‐Maury, I., & Shete, S. S. (2020) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.9072 · Cited by 107
Wells, M., Aitchison, P., Harris, F., Özakinci, G., Radley, A., Bauld, L., Entwistle, V. A., Munro, A., Haw, S. J., Culbard, B., et al. (2017) · BMC Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12885-017-3344-z · Cited by 105
“Recent studies have found higher ‘quit rates’ in smokers with cancer compared to smokers in the general population [24], indicating that they may be more receptive to cessation support.”
BackgroundLand, S. R., Toll, B. A., Moinpour, C. M., Mitchell, S. A., Ostroff, J. S., Hatsukami, D. K., Duffy, S. A., Gritz, E. R., Rigotti, N. A., Brandon, T. H., et al. (2016) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-16-0104 · Cited by 101
Metadata
- Authors
- Westmaas, J. L., Newton, C. C., Stevens, V. L., Flanders, W. D., Gapstur, S. M., & Jacobs, E. J.
- Affiliations
- American Cancer Society (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2015-05-20
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 1647-1652
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2101545667
- Cited by
- 124
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 5
- FWCI
- 12.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
- Keywords
- smoking cessation, cancer diagnosis, teachable moments, cancer survivors, lung cancer, head and neck cancer, esophageal cancer, metastatic cancer, cardiovascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Cancer Prevention Study II Nutrition Cohort
- MeSH terms
- Smoking Prevention, Adult, Aged, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Life Style, Male, Middle Aged, Motivation, Neoplasms, Prognosis, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Time Factors, Tobacco Use Disorder, United States, Smoking Cessation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
