The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Phase III Multinational, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Tivantinib (ARQ 197) Plus Erlotinib Versus Erlotinib Alone in Previously Treated Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Nonsquamous Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: Tivantinib, a MET receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, demonstrated increased anticancer activity in preclinical and early clinical studies when combined with erlotinib. Our study aimed to confirm efficacy and safety of the combination in previously treated patients with non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients and Methods: Patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC previously treated with one to two systemic regimens, including a platinum doublet, were randomly assigned at a 1:1 ratio to receive erlotinib 150 mg daily plus oral tivantinib 360 mg twice daily (E + T) or erlotinib plus placebo (E + P) until disease progression. Tumor specimens were evaluated for EGFR and KRAS mutations, MET expression, and MET gene amplification. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Secondary and exploratory objectives included progression-free survival (PFS), OS in molecular subgroups, and safety. Results: The study enrolled 1,048 patients and was discontinued for futility at the interim analysis. OS did not improve with E + T versus E + P (median OS, 8.5 v 7.8 months, respectively; hazard ratio [HR], 0.98; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.15; P = .81), even though PFS increased (median PFS, 3.6 v 1.9 months; HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.62 to 0.89; P < .001). Exploratory subgroup analyses suggested OS improvement in patients with high MET expression (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.49 to 1.01). Most common adverse events occurring with E + T versus E + P were rash (33.1% v 37.3%, respectively), diarrhea (34.6% v 41.0%), asthenia or fatigue (43.5% v 38.1%), and neutropenia (grade 3 to 4; 8.5% v 0.8%). Conclusion: E + T was well tolerated and increased PFS but did not improve OS in the overall nonsquamous NSCLC population.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)
Eisenhauer, E. A., Therasse, P., Bogaerts, J., Schwartz, L. H., Sargent, D., Ford, R., Dancey, J., Arbuck, S., Gwyther, S., Mooney, M., et al. (2009) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026 · Cited by 29,534
Erlotinib in Previously Treated Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Shepherd, F. A., Rodrigues Pereira, J., Ciuleanu, T., Tan, E. H., Hirsh, V., Thongprasert, S., Campos, D., Maoleekoonpiroj, S., Smylie, M., Martins, R., et al. (2005) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa050753 · Cited by 5,419
Self-citationCrizotinib versus Chemotherapy in Advanced ALK -Positive Lung Cancer
Shaw, A. T., Kim, D.-W., Nakagawa, K., Seto, T., Crinó, L., Ahn, M.-J., De Pas, T., Besse, B., Solomon, B. J., Blackhall, F., et al. (2013) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1214886 · Cited by 3,381
Self-citationDiscrete sequential boundaries for clinical trials
GORDON LAN, K. K., & DEMETS, D. L. (1983) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/70.3.659 · Cited by 2,310
Cappuzzo, F., Ciuleanu, T., Stelmakh, L., Cicenas, S., Szczésna, A., Juhász, E., Esteban, E., Molinier, O., Brugger, W., Melezínek, I., et al. (2010) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(10)70112-1 · Cited by 1,186
NSCLC Meta-Analyses Collaborative Group (2008) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2008.17.7162 · Cited by 604
Cited by
Comprehensive review of targeted therapy for colorectal cancer
Xie, Y.-H., Chen, Y.-X., & Fang, J.-Y. (2020) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-020-0116-z · Cited by 1,687
The Advantages of Targeted Protein Degradation Over Inhibition: An RTK Case Study
Burslem, G. M., Smith, B. E., Lai, A. C., Jaime-Figueroa, S., McQuaid, D. C., Bondeson, D. P., Toure, M., Dong, H., Qian, Y., Wang, J., et al. (2018) · Cell Chemical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.chembiol.2017.09.009 · Cited by 686
Planchard, D., Kim, T. M., Mazieres, J., Quoix, E., Riely, G., Barlesi, F., Souquet, P.-J., Smit, E. F., Groen, H. J. M., Kelly, R. J., et al. (2016) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(16)00077-2 · Cited by 453
Targeting MET in Lung Cancer: Will Expectations Finally Be MET?
Drilon, A., Cappuzzo, F., Ou, S.-H. I., & Camidge, D. R. (2017) · Journal of Thoracic Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.jtho.2016.10.014 · Cited by 389
Scientific Advances in Lung Cancer 2015
Tsao, A. S., Scagliotti, G. V., Bunn, P. A., Carbone, D. P., Warren, G. W., Bai, C., de Koning, H. J., Yousaf-Khan, A. U., McWilliams, A., Tsao, M. S., et al. (2016) · Journal of Thoracic Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.jtho.2016.03.012 · Cited by 284
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Scagliotti, G., von Pawel, J., Novello, S., Ramlau, R., Favaretto, A., Barlesi, F., Akerley, W., Orlov, S., Santoro, A., Spigel, D., Hirsh, V., Shepherd, F. A., Sequist, L. V., Sandler, A., Ross, J. S., Wang, Q., von Roemeling, R., Shuster, D., & Schwartz, B.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2015-08-20
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 2667-2674
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2160725767
- Cited by
- 265
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 33.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phase III Multinational, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Tivantinib (ARQ 197) Plus Erlotinib Versus Erlotinib Alone in Previously Treated Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Nonsquamous Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2014.60.7317
- The paper
- Scagliotti, G., von Pawel, J., Novello, S., Ramlau, R., Favaretto, A., Barlesi, F., Akerley, W., Orlov, S., Santoro, A., Spigel, D., Hirsh, V., Shepherd, F. A., Sequist, L. V., Sandler, A., Ross, J. S., Wang, Q., von Roemeling, R., Shuster, D., & Schwartz, B. (2015). Phase III Multinational, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Tivantinib (ARQ 197) Plus Erlotinib Versus Erlotinib Alone in Previously Treated Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Nonsquamous Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2014.60.7317
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
