Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 185

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Use and Effectiveness of Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Treatment of Ovarian Cancer

Open access
Wright, Alexi A., Cronin, Angel, Milne, Dana E., Bookman, Michael A., Burger, Robert A., Cohn, David E., Cristea, Mihaela C., Griggs, Jennifer J., Keating, Nancy L., Levenback, Charles F., Mantia-Smaldone, Gina, Matulonis, Ursula A., Meyer, Larissa A., Niland, Joyce C., Weeks, Jane C., O'Malley, David M.·2015·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: A 2006 randomized trial demonstrated a 16-month survival benefit with intraperitoneal and intravenous (IP/IV) chemotherapy administered to patients who had ovarian cancer, compared with IV chemotherapy alone, but more treatment-related toxicities. The objective of this study was to examine the use and effectiveness of IP/IV chemotherapy in clinical practice. Patients and Methods: Prospective cohort study of 823 women with stage III, optimally cytoreduced ovarian cancer diagnosed at six National Comprehensive Cancer Network institutions. We examined IP/IV chemotherapy use in all patients diagnosed between 2003 and 2012 (N = 823), and overall survival and treatment-related toxicities with Cox regression and logistic regression, respectively, in a propensity score–matched sample (n = 402) of patients diagnosed from 2006 to 2012, excluding trial participants, to minimize selection bias. Results: Use of IP/IV chemotherapy increased from 0% to 33% between 2003 and 2006, increased to 50% from 2007 to 2008, and plateaued thereafter. Between 2006 and 2012, adoption of IP/IV chemotherapy varied by institution from 4% to 67% (P < .001) and 43% of patients received modified IP/IV regimens at treatment initiation. In the propensity score–matched sample, IP/IV chemotherapy was associated with significantly improved overall survival (3-year overall survival, 81% v 71%; hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.99), compared with IV chemotherapy, but also more frequent alterations in chemotherapy delivery route (adjusted rates discontinuation or change, 20.4% v 10.0%; adjusted odds ratio, 2.83; 95% CI, 1.47 to 5.47). Conclusion: Although the use of IP/IV chemotherapy increased significantly at National Comprehensive Cancer Network centers between 2003 and 2012, fewer than 50% of eligible patients received it. Increasing IP/IV chemotherapy use in clinical practice may be an important and underused strategy to improve ovarian cancer outcomes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2015.61.4776

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 185

Metadata

Authors
Wright, A. A., Cronin, A., Milne, D. E., Bookman, M. A., Burger, R. A., Cohn, D. E., Cristea, M. C., Griggs, J. J., Keating, N. L., Levenback, C. F., Mantia-Smaldone, G., Matulonis, U. A., Meyer, L. A., Niland, J. C., Weeks, J. C., & O'Malley, D. M.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2015-09-10
Volume
33
Issue
26
Pages
2841-2847
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2099373382
Cited by
185
References
0
FWCI
21.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Use and Effectiveness of Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Treatment of Ovarian Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2015.61.4776
The paper
Wright, A. A., Cronin, A., Milne, D. E., Bookman, M. A., Burger, R. A., Cohn, D. E., Cristea, M. C., Griggs, J. J., Keating, N. L., Levenback, C. F., Mantia-Smaldone, G., Matulonis, U. A., Meyer, L. A., Niland, J. C., Weeks, J. C., & O'Malley, D. M. (2015). Use and Effectiveness of Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Treatment of Ovarian Cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2015.61.4776

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.