Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 333

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

West German Study Group Phase III PlanB Trial: First Prospective Outcome Data for the 21-Gene Recurrence Score Assay and Concordance of Prognostic Markers by Central and Local Pathology Assessment

Gluz, Oleg, Nitz, Ulrike A., Christgen, Matthias, Kates, Ronald E., Shak, Steven, Clemens, Michael, Kraemer, Stefan, Aktas, Bahriye, Kuemmel, Sherko, Reimer, Toralf, Kusche, Manfred, Heyl, Volker, Lorenz-Salehi, Fatemeh, Just, Marianne, Hofmann, Daniel, Degenhardt, Tom, Liedtke, Cornelia, Svedman, Christer, Wuerstlein, Rachel, Kreipe, Hans H., Harbeck, Nadia·2016·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: The 21-gene Recurrence Score (RS) assay is a validated prognostic/predictive tool in early hormone receptor–positive breast cancer (BC); however, only a few prospective outcome results have been available so far. In the phase III PlanB trial, RS was prospectively used to define a subset of patients who received only endocrine therapy. We present 3-year outcome data and concordance analysis (among biomarkers/RS). Patients and Methods: Central tumor bank was established prospectively from PlanB (intermediate and high-risk, locally human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative BC). After an early amendment, HR-positive, pN0-1 patients with RS ≤ 11 were recommended to omit chemotherapy. Results: From 2009 to 2011, PlanB enrolled 3,198 patients with a median age of 56 years; 41.1% had node-positive and 32.5% grade 3 disease. In 348 patients (15.3%), chemotherapy was omitted based on RS ≤ 11. After 35 months median follow-up, 3-year disease-free survival in patients with RS ≤ 11 and endocrine therapy alone was 98% versus 92% and 98% in RS > 25 and RS 12 to 25 in chemotherapy-treated patients, respectively. Nodal status, central and local grade, the Ki-67 protein encoded by the MKI67 gene, estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, tumor size, and RS were univariate prognostic factors for disease-free survival; only nodal status, both central and local grade, and RS were independent multivariate factors. Histologic grade was discordant between central and local laboratories in 44%. RS was positively but moderately correlated with the Ki-67 protein encoded by the MKI67 gene and grade and negatively correlated with progesterone receptor and estrogen receptor. Conclusion: In this prospective trial, patients with enhanced clinical risk and omitted chemotherapy on the basis of RS ≤ 11 had excellent 3-year survival. The substantial discordance observed between traditional prognostic markers and RS emphasizes the need for standardized assessment and supports the potential integration of standardized, well-validated genomic assays such as RS with clinicopathologic prognostic factors for chemotherapy indication in early hormone receptor–positive BC.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2015.63.5383

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 333

Metadata

Authors
Gluz, O., Nitz, U. A., Christgen, M., Kates, R. E., Shak, S., Clemens, M., Kraemer, S., Aktas, B., Kuemmel, S., Reimer, T., Kusche, M., Heyl, V., Lorenz-Salehi, F., Just, M., Hofmann, D., Degenhardt, T., Liedtke, C., Svedman, C., Wuerstlein, R., Kreipe, H. H., & Harbeck, N.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2016-07-10
Volume
34
Issue
20
Pages
2341-2349
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2289933199
Cited by
333
References
1
FWCI
17.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: West German Study Group Phase III PlanB Trial: First Prospective Outcome Data for the 21-Gene Recurrence Score Assay and Concordance of Prognostic Markers by Central and Local Pathology Assessment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2015.63.5383
The paper
Gluz, O., Nitz, U. A., Christgen, M., Kates, R. E., Shak, S., Clemens, M., Kraemer, S., Aktas, B., Kuemmel, S., Reimer, T., Kusche, M., Heyl, V., Lorenz-Salehi, F., Just, M., Hofmann, D., Degenhardt, T., Liedtke, C., Svedman, C., Wuerstlein, R., . . . Harbeck, N. (2016). West German Study Group Phase III PlanB Trial: First Prospective Outcome Data for the 21-Gene Recurrence Score Assay and Concordance of Prognostic Markers by Central and Local Pathology Assessment. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2015.63.5383

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.