Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 686

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Morbidity and Mortality of Laparoscopic Versus Open D2 Distal Gastrectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Hu, Yanfeng, Huang, Changming, Sun, Yihong, Su, Xiangqian, Cao, Hui, Hu, Jiankun, Xue, Yingwei, Suo, Jian, Tao, Kaixiong, He, Xianli, Wei, Hongbo, Ying, Mingang, Hu, Weiguo, Du, Xiaohui, Chen, Pingyan, Liu, Hao, Zheng, Chaohui, Liu, Fenglin, Yu, Jiang, Li, Ziyu, Zhao, Gang, Chen, Xinzu, Wang, Kuan, Li, Ping, Xing, Jiadi, Li, Guoxin·2016·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: The safety and efficacy of radical laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LG) with D2 lymphadenectomy for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer (AGC) remain controversial. We conducted a randomized controlled trial to compare laparoscopic and conventional open distal gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissections for AGC. Patients and Methods: Between September 2012 and December 2014, 1,056 patients with clinical stage T2-4aN0-3M0 gastric cancer were eligible for inclusion. They were randomly assigned to either the LG with D2 lymphadenectomy group (n = 528) or the open gastrectomy (OG) with D2 lymphadenectomy group (n = 528). Fifteen experienced surgeons from 14 institutions in China participated in the study. The morbidity and mortality within 30 days after surgery between the LG (n = 519) and the OG (n = 520) groups were compared on the basis of the modified intention-to-treat principle. Postoperative complications were stratified according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Results: The compliance rates of D2 lymphadenectomy were similar between the LG and OG groups (99.4% v 99.6%; P = .845). The postoperative morbidity was 15.2% in the LG group and 12.9% in OG group with no significant difference (difference, 2.3%; 95% CI, –1.9 to 6.6; P = .285). The mortality rate was 0.4% for the LG group and zero for the OG group (difference, 0.4%; 95% CI, –0.4 to 1.4; P = .249). The distribution of severity was similar between the two groups (P = .314). Conclusion: Experienced surgeons can safely perform LG with D2 lymphadenectomy for AGC.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2015.63.7215

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 24 references

Cited by

See all 686

Metadata

Authors
Hu, Y., Huang, C., Sun, Y., Su, X., Cao, H., Hu, J., Xue, Y., Suo, J., Tao, K., He, X., Wei, H., Ying, M., Hu, W., Du, X., Chen, P., Liu, H., Zheng, C., Liu, F., Yu, J., Li, Z., Zhao, G., Chen, X., Wang, K., Li, P., Xing, J., & Li, G.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2016-04-20
Volume
34
Issue
12
Pages
1350-1357
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2287250785
Cited by
686
References
24
FWCI
61.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Morbidity and Mortality of Laparoscopic Versus Open D2 Distal Gastrectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2015.63.7215
The paper
Hu, Y., Huang, C., Sun, Y., Su, X., Cao, H., Hu, J., Xue, Y., Suo, J., Tao, K., He, X., Wei, H., Ying, M., Hu, W., Du, X., Chen, P., Liu, H., Zheng, C., Liu, F., Yu, J., . . . Li, G. (2016). Morbidity and Mortality of Laparoscopic Versus Open D2 Distal Gastrectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2015.63.7215

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.