The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluation of Immune-Related Response Criteria and RECIST v1.1 in Patients With Advanced Melanoma Treated With Pembrolizumab
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: We evaluated atypical response patterns and the relationship between overall survival and best overall response measured per immune-related response criteria (irRC) and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) in patients with advanced melanoma treated with pembrolizumab in the phase Ib KEYNOTE-001 study (clinical trial information: NCT01295827). Patients and Methods: Patients received pembrolizumab 2 or 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks or every 3 weeks. Atypical responses were identified by using centrally assessed irRC data in patients with ≥ 28 weeks of imaging. Pseudoprogression was defined as ≥ 25% increase in tumor burden at week 12 (early) or any assessment after week 12 (delayed) that was not confirmed as progressive disease at next assessment. Response was assessed centrally per irRC and RECIST v1.1. Results: Of the 655 patients with melanoma enrolled, 327 had ≥ 28 weeks of imaging follow-up. Twenty-four (7%) of these 327 patients had atypical responses (15 [5%] with early pseudoprogression and nine [3%] with delayed pseudoprogression). Of the 592 patients who survived ≥ 12 weeks, 84 (14%) experienced progressive disease per RECIST v1.1 but nonprogressive disease per irRC. Two-year overall survival rates were 77.6% in patients with nonprogressive disease per both criteria (n = 331), 37.5% in patients with progressive disease per RECIST v1.1 but nonprogressive disease per irRC (n = 84), and 17.3% in patients with progressive disease per both criteria (n = 177). Conclusion: Atypical responses were observed in patients with melanoma treated with pembrolizumab. Based on survival analysis, conventional RECIST might underestimate the benefit of pembrolizumab in approximately 15% of patients; modified criteria that permit treatment beyond initial progression per RECIST v1.1 might prevent premature cessation of treatment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
PD-1 and PD-L1 Immune Checkpoint Blockade to Treat Breast Cancer
Hartkopf, A. D., Taran, F.-A., Wallwiener, M., Walter, C. B., Krämer, B., Grischke, E.-M., & Brucker, S. Y. (2016) · Breast Care · doi:10.1159/000453569 · Cited by 30,845
New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)
Eisenhauer, E. A., Therasse, P., Bogaerts, J., Schwartz, L. H., Sargent, D., Ford, R., Dancey, J., Arbuck, S., Gwyther, S., Mooney, M., et al. (2009) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026 · Cited by 29,534
New Guidelines to Evaluate the Response to Treatment in Solid Tumors
Therasse, P., Arbuck, S. G., Eisenhauer, E. A., Wanders, J., Kaplan, R. S., Rubinstein, L., Verweij, J., Van Glabbeke, M., van Oosterom, A. T., Christian, M. C., et al. (2000) · JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/92.3.205 · Cited by 15,660
Adverse Renal Effects of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Narrative Review
Wanchoo, R., Karam, S., Uppal, N. N., Barta, V. S., Deray, G., Devoe, C., Launay-Vacher, V., Jhaveri, K. D., & on behalf of Cancer and Kidney International Network Workgroup on Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (2017) · American Journal of Nephrology · doi:10.1159/000455014 · Cited by 15,256
Improved Survival with Ipilimumab in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma
Hodi, F. S., O'Day, S. J., McDermott, D. F., Weber, R. W., Sosman, J. A., Haanen, J. B., Gonzalez, R., Robert, C., Schadendorf, D., Hassel, J. C., et al. (2010) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1003466 · Cited by 15,155
Self-citationNivolumab in Previously Untreated Melanoma without BRAF Mutation
Robert, C., Long, G. V., Brady, B., Dutriaux, C., Maio, M., Mortier, L., Hassel, J. C., Rutkowski, P., McNeil, C., Kalinka-Warzocha, E., et al. (2015) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1412082 · Cited by 5,519
Self-citationPD-1 and Its Ligands in Tolerance and Immunity
Keir, M. E., Butte, M. J., Freeman, G. J., & Sharpe, A. H. (2008) · Annual Review of Immunology · doi:10.1146/annurev.immunol.26.021607.090331 · Cited by 5,378
Predictive correlates of response to the anti-PD-L1 antibody MPDL3280A in cancer patients
Herbst, R. S., Soria, J.-C., Kowanetz, M., Fine, G. D., Hamid, O., Gordon, M. S., Sosman, J. A., McDermott, D. F., Powderly, J. D., Gettinger, S. N., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14011 · Cited by 5,231
Self-citationTumor-associated B7-H1 promotes T-cell apoptosis: A potential mechanism of immune evasion
Dong, H., Strome, S. E., Salomao, D. R., Tamura, H., Hirano, F., Flies, D. B., Roche, P. C., Lu, J., Zhu, G., Tamada, K., et al. (2002) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm730 · Cited by 5,025
Restoring function in exhausted CD8 T cells during chronic viral infection
Barber, D. L., Wherry, E. J., Masopust, D., Zhu, B., Allison, J. P., Sharpe, A. H., Freeman, G. J., & Ahmed, R. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04444 · Cited by 3,986
Cited by
iRECIST: guidelines for response criteria for use in trials testing immunotherapeutics
Seymour, L., Bogaerts, J., Perrone, A., Ford, R., Schwartz, L. H., Mandrekar, S., Lin, N. U., Litière, S., Dancey, J., Chen, A., et al. (2017) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(17)30074-8 · Cited by 2,472
Self-citationTop 10 Challenges in Cancer Immunotherapy
Hegde, P. S., & Chen, D. S. (2020) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2019.12.011 · Cited by 2,238
Neoadjuvant PD-1 Blockade in Resectable Lung Cancer
Forde, P. M., Chaft, J. E., Smith, K. N., Anagnostou, V., Cottrell, T. R., Hellmann, M. D., Zahurak, M., Yang, S. C., Jones, D. R., Broderick, S., et al. (2018) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1716078 · Cited by 2,099
Self-citationMonitoring immune-checkpoint blockade: response evaluation and biomarker development
Nishino, M., Ramaiya, N. H., Hatabu, H., & Hodi, F. S. (2017) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2017.88 · Cited by 1,023
Self-citationArmand, P., Engert, A., Younes, A., Fanale, M., Santoro, A., Zinzani, P. L., Timmerman, J. M., Collins, G. P., Ramchandren, R., Cohen, J. B., et al. (2018) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2017.76.0793 · Cited by 759
Metadata
- Authors
- Hodi, F. S., Hwu, W.-J., Kefford, R., Weber, J. S., Daud, A., Hamid, O., Patnaik, A., Ribas, A., Robert, C., Gangadhar, T. C., Joshua, A. M., Hersey, P., Dronca, R., Joseph, R., Hille, D., Xue, D., Li, X. N., Kang, S. P., Ebbinghaus, S., Perrone, A., & Wolchok, J. D.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2016-05-01
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 1510-1517
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2296049142
- Cited by
- 734
- References
- 24
- FWCI
- 57.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of Immune-Related Response Criteria and RECIST v1.1 in Patients With Advanced Melanoma Treated With Pembrolizumab. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2015.64.0391
- The paper
- Hodi, F. S., Hwu, W.-J., Kefford, R., Weber, J. S., Daud, A., Hamid, O., Patnaik, A., Ribas, A., Robert, C., Gangadhar, T. C., Joshua, A. M., Hersey, P., Dronca, R., Joseph, R., Hille, D., Xue, D., Li, X. N., Kang, S. P., Ebbinghaus, S., . . . Wolchok, J. D. (2016). Evaluation of Immune-Related Response Criteria and RECIST v1.1 in Patients With Advanced Melanoma Treated With Pembrolizumab. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2015.64.0391
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
