The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A phase I study of the EZH2 inhibitor tazemetostat in pediatric subjects with relapsed or refractory INI1-negative tumors or synovial sarcoma.
Abstract
TPS10587 Background: Tazemetostat is a potent and selective inhibitor of the histone methyltransferase enhancer of zeste-homolog 2 (EZH2), the catalytic subunit of the polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2). EZH2 is responsible for trimethylation of lysine 27 on histone H3, which results in chromatin remodelling and repressed transcription. Aberrant EZH2 activity has been implicated as an oncogenic driver in non-Hodgkin lymphoma and other malignancies. The SWI/SNF complex also remodels chromatin, activates transcription, and acts in opposition to PRC2. Oncogenesis from mutation and/or loss of the SWI/SNF subunit INI1 in cancers such as malignant rhabdoid tumor (MRT) or SMARCA4 loss in ovarian “small cell carcinoma, hypercalcemic type” is associated with anticancer activity of EZH2 inhibition in preclinical models. This has translated into objective responses of promising durability in subjects (subjs) whose solid tumors exhibited either INI1 or SMARCA4 loss in the tazemetostat phase I adult study. Methods: This phase I, multi-center dose escalation (DEsc) and dose expansion (DExp) study administers tazemetostat twice daily (BID) using an oral suspension formulation in pediatric subjs age 6 months to 21 years. Approximately 24 subjs will be dosed using a “Rolling 6” DEsc design at a starting dose of 240 mg/m2 BID. Following DEsc, a DExp cohort will enroll up to 20 subjs. Eligible malignancies includerhabdoid tumors (MRT, atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor, rhabdoid tumor of the kidney, MRT of ovary) that are INI1 or SMARCA4 negative, synovial sarcoma, and other INI1 negative tumors including epithelioid sarcoma, renal medullary carcinoma, myoepithelial carcinoma, and others. Response assessments are evaluated every 8 weeks using RANO or RECIST 1.1. Primary endpoints include dose-limiting toxicities/maximum tolerated dose (DEsc) and overall response rate (ORR) (DExp). Secondary endpoints include ORR (DEsc), progression-free survival, overall survival, safety/tolerability, PK and duration of response for confirmed responders. The first subj was dosed in January 2016 in the US with additional sites to be opened in Canada, the EU and Australia (NCT02601937). Clinical trial information: NCT02601937.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The increased response rates in EZH2-mutant tumours mirrors preclinical studies.
“The increased response rates in EZH2-mutant tumours mirrors preclinical studies and highlights the importance of understanding the mechanisms underlying EZH2 dependence”
From The roles of DNA, RNA and histone methylation in ageing and cancer (2019) · cites this paper as [169]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The roles of DNA, RNA and histone methylation in ageing and cancer
Michalak, E. M., Burr, M. L., Bannister, A. J., & Dawson, M. A. (2019) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41580-019-0143-1 · Cited by 549
Inhibitors of Protein Methyltransferases and Demethylases
Kanıskan, H. Ü., Martini, M. L., & Jin, J. J. (2017) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00801 · Cited by 327
Chromatin regulatory mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities in cancer
Valencia, A. M., & Kadoch, C. (2018) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41556-018-0258-1 · Cited by 212
Kumar, R., Liu, A. P. Y., Orr, B. A., Northcott, P. A., & Robinson, G. W. (2018) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.31583 · Cited by 72
A historical recount of chordoma
Sahyouni, R., Goshtasbi, K., Mahmoodi, A., et al. (2018) · Journal of Neurosurgery Spine · doi:10.3171/2017.7.spine17668 · Cited by 59
Wen, X., Cimera, R., Aryeequaye, R., et al. (2021) · Genes Chromosomes and Cancer · doi:10.1002/gcc.22992 · Cited by 20
Curcio, C., Cimera, R., Aryeequaye, R., et al. (2020) · Genes Chromosomes and Cancer · doi:10.1002/gcc.22895 · Cited by 14
Martín‐Broto, J., Reichardt, P., Jones, R. L., et al. (2020) · Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy · doi:10.1080/14737140.2020.1753510 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Chi, S. N., McCowage, G. B., Hoffman, L., Macy, M., Doleman, S., Blakemore, S. J., Clawson, A., Daigle, S., Tang, J., Roche, M., & Ho, P. T. C.
- Affiliations
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US)
- Children's Hospital at Westmead (AU)
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US)
- University of Colorado Denver (US)
- Epizyme (United States) (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2016-05-20
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 15_suppl
- Pages
- TPS10587-TPS10587
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2760908566
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
- Type
- conference abstract
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chromatin Remodeling and Cancer
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
- Keywords
- tazemetostat, EZH2 inhibition, polycomb repressive complex 2, synovial sarcoma, malignant rhabdoid tumor, pediatric solid tumors, relapsed/refractory cancer, dose-limiting toxicity, maximum tolerated dose, oral suspension, H3K27me3, SWI/SNF complex
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review