Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 326

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Baseline Metabolic Tumor Volume Predicts Outcome in High–Tumor-Burden Follicular Lymphoma: A Pooled Analysis of Three Multicenter Studies

Open access
Meignan, Michel, Cottereau, Anne Ségolène, Versari, Annibale, Chartier, Loïc, Dupuis, Jehan, Boussetta, Sami, Grassi, Ilaria, Casasnovas, René-Olivier, Haioun, Corinne, Tilly, Hervé, Tarantino, Vittoria, Dubreuil, Julien, Federico, Massimo, Salles, Gilles, Luminari, Stefano, Trotman, Judith·2016·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: Identifying patients at high risk of progression and early death among those with high-tumor-burden follicular lymphoma (FL) is unsatisfactory with current prognostic models. This study aimed to determine the prognostic impact of the total metabolic tumor volume (TMTV) measured at baseline with [18 F]fluorodeoxyglucose/positron emission tomography-computed tomography ([18 F]FDG/PET-CT) scans and its added value to these models. Patients and Methods: A pooled analysis was performed by using patient data and centrally reviewed baseline PET-CT scans for 185 patients with FL who were receiving immunochemotherapy within three prospective trials. TMTV was computed by using the 41% maximum standardized uptake value thresholding method, and the optimal cutoff for survival prediction was determined. Results: Median age was 55 years, 92% of patients had stage III to IV disease, 37% had a Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI) score of 3 to 5, and 31% had a FLIPI2 score of 3 to 5. With a median follow-up of 64 months, overall 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 55% and overall survival (OS) was 92%. Median TMTV was 297 cm 3 (quartile 1 through quartile 3, 135 to 567 cm 3). The optimal cutoff identified was 510 cm 3, with a markedly inferior survival in the 29% of patients with TMTV > 510 cm 3. Five-year PFS was 33% versus 65% (hazard ratio [HR], 2.90; P < .001), and 5-year OS was 85% versus 95% (HR, 3.45; P = .010). On multivariable analysis, TMTV (HR, 2.3; P = .002) and FLIPI2 score (HR, 2.2; P = .002) were independent predictors of PFS. In combination, they identify three risk groups: high TMTV and intermediate-to-high FLIPI2 score with 5-year PFS of 20% (HR, 5.0; P < .001), high TMTV or intermediate-to-high FLIPI2 score with 5-year PFS of 46% (HR, 2.1; P = .007), and low TMTV and low FLIP2 with 5-year PFS of 69%. Conclusion: Baseline TMTV is a strong independent predictor of outcome in FL. In combination with FLIPI2 score, it identifies patients at high risk of early progression. It warrants further validation as a biomarker for development of first-line PET-adapted approaches in FL.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2016.66.9440

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 326

Metadata

Authors
Meignan, M., Cottereau, A. S., Versari, A., Chartier, L., Dupuis, J., Boussetta, S., Grassi, I., Casasnovas, R.-O., Haioun, C., Tilly, H., Tarantino, V., Dubreuil, J., Federico, M., Salles, G., Luminari, S., & Trotman, J.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2016-10-20
Volume
34
Issue
30
Pages
3618-3626
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2507512417
Cited by
326
References
2
FWCI
23.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Baseline Metabolic Tumor Volume Predicts Outcome in High–Tumor-Burden Follicular Lymphoma: A Pooled Analysis of Three Multicenter Studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2016.66.9440
The paper
Meignan, M., Cottereau, A. S., Versari, A., Chartier, L., Dupuis, J., Boussetta, S., Grassi, I., Casasnovas, R.-O., Haioun, C., Tilly, H., Tarantino, V., Dubreuil, J., Federico, M., Salles, G., Luminari, S., & Trotman, J. (2016). Baseline Metabolic Tumor Volume Predicts Outcome in High–Tumor-Burden Follicular Lymphoma: A Pooled Analysis of Three Multicenter Studies. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2016.66.9440

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.