Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 313

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Propensity Score Analysis of Radical Cystectomy Versus Bladder-Sparing Trimodal Therapy in the Setting of a Multidisciplinary Bladder Cancer Clinic

Open access
Kulkarni, Girish S., Hermanns, Thomas, Wei, Yanliang, Bhindi, Bimal, Satkunasivam, Raj, Athanasopoulos, Paul, Bostrom, Peter J., Kuk, Cynthia, Li, Kathy, Templeton, Arnoud J., Sridhar, Srikala S., van der Kwast, Theodorus H., Chung, Peter, Bristow, Robert G., Milosevic, Michael, Warde, Padraig, Fleshner, Neil E., Jewett, Michael A.S., Bashir, Shaheena, Zlotta, Alexandre R.·2017·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: Multidisciplinary management improves complex treatment decision making in cancer care, but its impact for bladder cancer (BC) has not been documented. Although radical cystectomy (RC) currently is viewed as the standard of care for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), radiotherapy-based, bladder-sparing trimodal therapy (TMT) that combines transurethral resection of bladder tumor, chemotherapy for radiation sensitization, and external beam radiotherapy has emerged as a valid treatment option. In the absence of randomized studies, this study compared the oncologic outcomes between patients treated with RC or TMT by using a propensity score matched-cohort analysis. Methods: Data from patients treated in a multidisciplinary bladder cancer clinic (MDBCC) from 2008 to 2013 were reviewed retrospectively. Those who received TMT for MIBC were identified and matched (for sex, cT and cN stage, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status, Charlson comorbidity score, treatment date, age, carcinoma in situ status, and hydronephrosis) with propensity scores to patients who underwent RC. Overall survival and disease-specific survival (DSS) were assessed with Cox proportional hazards modeling and a competing risk analysis, respectively. Results: A total of 112 patients with MIBC were included after matching (56 who had been treated with TMT, and 56 who underwent RC). The median age was 68.0 years, and 29.5% had stage cT3/cT4 disease. At a median follow-up of 4.51 years, there were 20 deaths (35.7%) in the RC group (13 as a result of BC) and 22 deaths (39.3%) in the TMT group (13 as a result of BC). The 5-year DSS rate was 73.2% and 76.6% in the RC and TMT groups, respectively ( P = .49). Salvage cystectomy was performed in 6 (10.7%) of 56 patients who received TMT. Conclusion: In the setting of a MDBCC, TMT yielded survival outcomes similar to those of matched patients who underwent RC. Appropriately selected patients with MIBC should be offered the opportunity to discuss various treatment options, including organ-sparing TMT.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2016.69.2327

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 18 references

Metadata

Authors
Kulkarni, G. S., Hermanns, T., Wei, Y., Bhindi, B., Satkunasivam, R., Athanasopoulos, P., Bostrom, P. J., Kuk, C., Li, K., Templeton, A. J., Sridhar, S. S., van der Kwast, T. H., Chung, P., Bristow, R. G., Milosevic, M., Warde, P., Fleshner, N. E., Jewett, M. A. S., Bashir, S., & Zlotta, A. R.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2017-07-10
Volume
35
Issue
20
Pages
2299-2305
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2606173101
Cited by
313
References
18
FWCI
31.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Propensity Score Analysis of Radical Cystectomy Versus Bladder-Sparing Trimodal Therapy in the Setting of a Multidisciplinary Bladder Cancer Clinic. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2016.69.2327
The paper
Kulkarni, G. S., Hermanns, T., Wei, Y., Bhindi, B., Satkunasivam, R., Athanasopoulos, P., Bostrom, P. J., Kuk, C., Li, K., Templeton, A. J., Sridhar, S. S., van der Kwast, T. H., Chung, P., Bristow, R. G., Milosevic, M., Warde, P., Fleshner, N. E., Jewett, M. A. S., Bashir, S., & Zlotta, A. R. (2017). Propensity Score Analysis of Radical Cystectomy Versus Bladder-Sparing Trimodal Therapy in the Setting of a Multidisciplinary Bladder Cancer Clinic. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2016.69.2327

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.