The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Propensity Score Analysis of Radical Cystectomy Versus Bladder-Sparing Trimodal Therapy in the Setting of a Multidisciplinary Bladder Cancer Clinic
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: Multidisciplinary management improves complex treatment decision making in cancer care, but its impact for bladder cancer (BC) has not been documented. Although radical cystectomy (RC) currently is viewed as the standard of care for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), radiotherapy-based, bladder-sparing trimodal therapy (TMT) that combines transurethral resection of bladder tumor, chemotherapy for radiation sensitization, and external beam radiotherapy has emerged as a valid treatment option. In the absence of randomized studies, this study compared the oncologic outcomes between patients treated with RC or TMT by using a propensity score matched-cohort analysis. Methods: Data from patients treated in a multidisciplinary bladder cancer clinic (MDBCC) from 2008 to 2013 were reviewed retrospectively. Those who received TMT for MIBC were identified and matched (for sex, cT and cN stage, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status, Charlson comorbidity score, treatment date, age, carcinoma in situ status, and hydronephrosis) with propensity scores to patients who underwent RC. Overall survival and disease-specific survival (DSS) were assessed with Cox proportional hazards modeling and a competing risk analysis, respectively. Results: A total of 112 patients with MIBC were included after matching (56 who had been treated with TMT, and 56 who underwent RC). The median age was 68.0 years, and 29.5% had stage cT3/cT4 disease. At a median follow-up of 4.51 years, there were 20 deaths (35.7%) in the RC group (13 as a result of BC) and 22 deaths (39.3%) in the TMT group (13 as a result of BC). The 5-year DSS rate was 73.2% and 76.6% in the RC and TMT groups, respectively ( P = .49). Salvage cystectomy was performed in 6 (10.7%) of 56 patients who received TMT. Conclusion: In the setting of a MDBCC, TMT yielded survival outcomes similar to those of matched patients who underwent RC. Appropriately selected patients with MIBC should be offered the opportunity to discuss various treatment options, including organ-sparing TMT.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Grossman, H. B., Natale, R. B., Tangen, C. M., Speights, V. O., Vogelzang, N. J., Trump, D. L., White, R. W. D., Sarosdy, M. F., Wood, D. P., Raghavan, D., et al. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa022148 · Cited by 2,668
EAU Guidelines on Non–Muscle-invasive Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder: Update 2013
Babjuk, M., Burger, M., Zigeuner, R., Shariat, S. F., van Rhijn, B. W. G., Compérat, E., Sylvester, R. J., Kaasinen, E., Böhle, A., Palou Redorta, J., et al. (2013) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2013.06.003 · Cited by 1,174
Radiotherapy with or without Chemotherapy in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer
James, N. D., Hussain, S. A., Hall, E., Jenkins, P., Tremlett, J., Rawlings, C., Crundwell, M., Sizer, B., Sreenivasan, T., Hendron, C., et al. (2012) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1106106 · Cited by 962
Hall, M. C., Chang, S. S., Dalbagni, G., Pruthi, R. S., Seigne, J. D., Skinner, E. C., Wolf, J. S., & Schellhammer, P. F. (2007) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/j.juro.2007.09.003 · Cited by 830
Treatment of Patients With Metastatic Urothelial Cancer “Unfit” for Cisplatin-Based Chemotherapy
Galsky, M. D., Hahn, N. M., Rosenberg, J., Sonpavde, G., Hutson, T., Oh, W. K., Dreicer, R., Vogelzang, N., Sternberg, C. N., Bajorin, D. F., et al. (2011) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2011.34.8433 · Cited by 705
Pillay, B., Wootten, A. C., Crowe, H., Corcoran, N., Tran, B., Bowden, P., Crowe, J., & Costello, A. J. (2016) · Cancer Treatment Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ctrv.2015.11.007 · Cited by 704
Mak, R. H., Hunt, D., Shipley, W. U., Efstathiou, J. A., Tester, W. J., Hagan, M. P., Kaufman, D. S., Heney, N. M., & Zietman, A. L. (2014) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2014.57.5548 · Cited by 465
Efstathiou, J. A., Spiegel, D. Y., Shipley, W. U., Heney, N. M., Kaufman, D. S., Niemierko, A., Coen, J. J., Skowronski, R. Y., Paly, J. J., McGovern, F. J., et al. (2012) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2011.11.010 · Cited by 435
Prades, J., Remue, E., van Hoof, E., & Borras, J. M. (2015) · Health Policy · doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.09.006 · Cited by 400
An overview of the objectives of and the approaches to propensity score analyses
Heinze, G., & Jüni, P. (2011) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehr031 · Cited by 379
Metadata
- Authors
- Kulkarni, G. S., Hermanns, T., Wei, Y., Bhindi, B., Satkunasivam, R., Athanasopoulos, P., Bostrom, P. J., Kuk, C., Li, K., Templeton, A. J., Sridhar, S. S., van der Kwast, T. H., Chung, P., Bristow, R. G., Milosevic, M., Warde, P., Fleshner, N. E., Jewett, M. A. S., Bashir, S., & Zlotta, A. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2017-07-10
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 2299-2305
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2606173101
- Cited by
- 313
- References
- 18
- FWCI
- 31.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Propensity Score Analysis of Radical Cystectomy Versus Bladder-Sparing Trimodal Therapy in the Setting of a Multidisciplinary Bladder Cancer Clinic. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2016.69.2327
- The paper
- Kulkarni, G. S., Hermanns, T., Wei, Y., Bhindi, B., Satkunasivam, R., Athanasopoulos, P., Bostrom, P. J., Kuk, C., Li, K., Templeton, A. J., Sridhar, S. S., van der Kwast, T. H., Chung, P., Bristow, R. G., Milosevic, M., Warde, P., Fleshner, N. E., Jewett, M. A. S., Bashir, S., & Zlotta, A. R. (2017). Propensity Score Analysis of Radical Cystectomy Versus Bladder-Sparing Trimodal Therapy in the Setting of a Multidisciplinary Bladder Cancer Clinic. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2016.69.2327
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.