The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Metastatic Lymph Node Burden and Survival in Oral Cavity Cancer
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: Current staging systems for oral cavity cancers incorporate lymph node (LN) size and laterality, but place less weight on the total number of positive metastatic nodes. We investigated the independent impact of numerical metastatic LN burden on survival. Methods: Adult patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma undergoing upfront surgical resection for curative intent were identified in the National Cancer Data Base between 2004 and 2013. A neck dissection of a minimum of 10 LNs was required. Multivariable models were constructed to assess the association between the number of metastatic LNs and survival, adjusting for factors such as nodal size, laterality, extranodal extension, margin status, and adjuvant treatment. Results: Overall, 14,554 patients met inclusion criteria (7,906 N0 patients; 6,648 node-positive patients). Mortality risk escalated continuously with increasing number of metastatic nodes without plateau, with the effect most pronounced with up to four LNs (HR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.29 to 1.39; P < .001). Extranodal extension (HR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.20 to 1.65; P < .001) and lower neck involvement (HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.06 to 1.27; P < .001) also predicted increased mortality. Increasing number of nodes examined was associated with improved survival, plateauing at 35 LNs (HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.98 to 0.99; P < .001). In multivariable models accounting for the number of metastatic nodes, contralateral LN involvement (N2c status) and LN size were not associated with mortality. A novel nodal staging system derived by recursive partitioning analysis exhibited greater concordance than the American Joint Committee on Cancer (8th edition) system. Conclusion: The number of metastatic nodes is a critical predictor of oral cavity cancer mortality, eclipsing other features such as LN size and contralaterality in prognostic value. More robust incorporation of numerical metastatic LN burden may augment staging and better inform adjuvant treatment decisions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Regression Models and Life-Tables
Cox, D. R. (1972) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1972.tb00899.x · Cited by 39,793
Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys
Rubin, D. B. (1987) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/9780470316696 · Cited by 20,701
(2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-40618-3 · Cited by 17,242
The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data.
Aitkin, M., Kalbfleisch, J. D., & Prentice, R. L. (1981) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2530581 · Cited by 9,877
Harrell, F. E. (2001) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-3462-1 · Cited by 9,195
A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values
Little, R. J. A. (1988) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1988.10478722 · Cited by 8,963
Multiple imputation of discrete and continuous data by fully conditional specification
van Buuren, S. (2007) · Statistical Methods in Medical Research · doi:10.1177/0962280206074463 · Cited by 2,827
A note on quantifying follow-up in studies of failure time
Schemper, M., & Smith, T. L. (1996) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/0197-2456(96)00075-x · Cited by 2,575
Le Voyer, T. E., Sigurdson, E. R., Hanlon, A. L., Mayer, R. J., Macdonald, J. S., Catalano, P. J., & Haller, D. G. (2003) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2003.05.062 · Cited by 1,149
PIECEWISE REGRESSION: A TOOL FOR IDENTIFYING ECOLOGICAL THRESHOLDS
Toms, J. D., & Lesperance, M. L. (2003) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/02-0472 · Cited by 1,038
Cited by
Staging and grading of oral squamous cell carcinoma: An update
Almangush, A., Mäkitie, A. A., Triantafyllou, A., de Bree, R., Strojan, P., Rinaldo, A., Hernandez-Prera, J. C., Suárez, C., Kowalski, L. P., Ferlito, A., et al. (2020) · Oral Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.oraloncology.2020.104799 · Cited by 403
Metadata
- Authors
- Ho, A. S., Kim, S., Tighiouart, M., Gudino, C., Mita, A., Scher, K. S., Laury, A., Prasad, R., Shiao, S. L., Van Eyk, J. E., & Zumsteg, Z. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2017-11-01
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 31
- Pages
- 3601-3609
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2752395816
- Cited by
- 300
- References
- 17
- FWCI
- 13.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Metastatic Lymph Node Burden and Survival in Oral Cavity Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2016.71.1176
- The paper
- Ho, A. S., Kim, S., Tighiouart, M., Gudino, C., Mita, A., Scher, K. S., Laury, A., Prasad, R., Shiao, S. L., Van Eyk, J. E., & Zumsteg, Z. S. (2017). Metastatic Lymph Node Burden and Survival in Oral Cavity Cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2016.71.1176
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.