Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,149

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Colon Cancer Survival Is Associated With Increasing Number of Lymph Nodes Analyzed: A Secondary Survey of Intergroup Trial INT-0089

Le Voyer, T.E., Sigurdson, E.R., Hanlon, A.L., Mayer, R.J., Macdonald, J.S., Catalano, P.J., Haller, D.G.·2003·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the relationship, in patients with adenocarcinoma of the colon, between survival and the number of lymph nodes analyzed from surgical specimens. Patients and Methods: Intergroup Trial INT-0089 is a mature trial of adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk patients with stage II and stage III colon cancer. We performed a secondary analysis of this group with overall survival (OS) as the main end point. Cause-specific survival (CSS) and disease-free survival were secondary end points. Rates for these outcome measures were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology. Log-rank test was used to compare overall curves, and Cox proportional hazards regression was used to multivariately assess predictors of outcome. Results: The median number of lymph nodes removed at colectomy was 11 (range, one to 87). Of the 3,411 assessable patients, 648 had no evidence of lymph node metastasis. Multivariate analyses were performed on the node-positive and node-negative groups separately to ascertain the effect of lymph node removal. Survival decreased with increasing number of lymph node involvement (P = .0001 for all three survival end points). After controlling for the number of nodes involved, survival increased as more nodes were analyzed (P = .0001 for all three end points). Even when no nodes were involved, OS and CSS improved as more lymph nodes were analyzed (P = .0005 and P = .007, respectively). Conclusion: The number of lymph nodes analyzed for staging colon cancers is, itself, a prognostic variable on outcome. The impact of this variable is such that it may be an important variable to include in evaluating future trials.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2003.05.062

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 1,149

Metadata

Authors
Le Voyer, T. E., Sigurdson, E. R., Hanlon, A. L., Mayer, R. J., Macdonald, J. S., Catalano, P. J., & Haller, D. G.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2003-08-01
Volume
21
Issue
15
Pages
2912-2919
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2152851361
Cited by
1,149
References
2
FWCI
15.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Colon Cancer Survival Is Associated With Increasing Number of Lymph Nodes Analyzed: A Secondary Survey of Intergroup Trial INT-0089. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2003.05.062
The paper
Le Voyer, T. E., Sigurdson, E. R., Hanlon, A. L., Mayer, R. J., Macdonald, J. S., Catalano, P. J., & Haller, D. G. (2003). Colon Cancer Survival Is Associated With Increasing Number of Lymph Nodes Analyzed: A Secondary Survey of Intergroup Trial INT-0089. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2003.05.062

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.