Cited by 698Multiple Myeloma Research and TreatmentsBone health and treatmentsProtein Degradation and Inhibitors

Lenalidomide Maintenance After Autologous Stem-Cell Transplantation in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: A Meta-Analysis

Open access
McCarthy, Philip L., Holstein, Sarah A., Petrucci, Maria Teresa, Richardson, Paul G., Hulin, Cyrille, Tosi, Patrizia, Bringhen, Sara, Musto, Pellegrino +11 more·2017·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose Lenalidomide maintenance therapy after autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) demonstrated prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) versus placebo or observation in several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). All studies had PFS as the primary end point, and none were powered for overall survival (OS) as a primary end point. Thus, a meta-analysis was conducted to better understand the impact of lenalidomide maintenance in this setting. Patients and Methods The meta-analysis was conducted using primary-source patient-level data and documentation from three RCTs (Cancer and Leukemia Group B 100104, Gruppo Italiano Malattie Ematologiche dell'Adulto RV-MM-PI-209, and Intergroupe Francophone du Myélome 2005-02) that met the following prespecified inclusion criteria: an RCT in patients with NDMM receiving ASCT followed by lenalidomide maintenance versus placebo or observation with patient-level data available and achieved database lock for primary efficacy analysis. Results Overall, 1,208 patients were included in the meta-analysis (605 patients in the lenalidomide maintenance group and 603 in the placebo or observation group). The median PFS was 52.8 months for the lenalidomide group and 23.5 months for the placebo or observation group (hazard ratio, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.41 to 0.55). At a median follow-up time of 79.5 months for all surviving patients, the median OS had not been reached for the lenalidomide maintenance group, whereas it was 86.0 months for the placebo or observation group (hazard ratio, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.63 to 0.90; P = .001). The cumulative incidence rate of a second primary malignancy before disease progression was higher with lenalidomide maintenance versus placebo or observation, whereas the cumulative incidence rates of progression, death, or death as a result of myeloma were all higher with placebo or observation versus lenalidomide maintenance. Conclusion This meta-analysis demonstrates a significant OS benefit and confirms the PFS benefit with lenalidomide maintenance after ASCT in patients with NDMM when compared with placebo or observation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2017.72.6679

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is an increased risk for the development of both secondary hematologic and solid organ cancers, especially in post-transplant maintenance with lenalidomide.

    “There is an increased risk for the development of both secondary hematologic and solid organ cancers, especially in post-transplant maintenance with lenalidomide [56].”

    From Epidemiology, Staging, and Management of Multiple Myeloma (2021) · cites this paper as [56]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McCarthy, P. L., Holstein, S. A., Petrucci, M. T., Richardson, P. G., Hulin, C., Tosi, P., Bringhen, S., Musto, P., Anderson, K. C., Caillot, D., Gay, F., Moreau, P., Marit, G., Jung, S.-H., Yu, Z., Winograd, B., Knight, R. D., Palumbo, A., & Attal, M.
Affiliations
  • Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center (US)
  • Philip L. McCarthy, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY; Sarah A. Holstein, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE; Maria Teresa Petrucci, University La Sapienza; Antonio Palumbo, Takeda Italia, Rome; Patrizia Tosi, Rimini Hospital, Rimini; Sara Bringhen and Francesca Gay, University of Torino, Torino; Pellegrino Musto, Cancer Institute for Research and Care and The Referral Cancer Center of Basilicata, Rionero in Vulture, Italy; Paul G. Richardson and Kenneth C. Anderson, Dana-Farber...
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2017-10-10
Volume
35
Issue
29
Pages
3279-3289
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2737964630
Cited by
698
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 44 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 57 · 2023: 90 · 2022: 79 · 2021: 94 · 2020: 117 · 2019: 79 · 2018: 68 · 2017: 16
FWCI
12.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Bari Aldo Moro) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Celgene
  • National Cancer Institute (U10CA180882, U10CA180821)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Bone health and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
Keywords
lenalidomide, maintenance therapy, autologous stem cell transplantation, newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, progression-free survival, overall survival, second primary malignancy, individual patient data
MeSH terms
Lenalidomide, Adult, Aged, Drug Administration Schedule, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Myeloma, Risk Factors, Thalidomide, Time Factors, Transplantation, Autologous, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Chemotherapy, Adjuvant, Disease Progression, Disease-Free Survival, Angiogenesis Inhibitors, Stem Cell Transplantation, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Young Adult, Maintenance Chemotherapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review