Cited by 1,155Multiple Myeloma Research and TreatmentsBone health and treatmentsMultiple Sclerosis Research Studies

Lenalidomide Maintenance after Stem-Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma

Open access
Attal, Michel, Lauwers-Cances, Valerie, Marit, Gerald, Caillot, Denis, Moreau, Philippe, Facon, Thierry, Stoppa, Anne Marie, Hulin, Cyrille +15 more·2012·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: High-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem-cell transplantation is a standard treatment for young patients with multiple myeloma. Residual disease is almost always present after transplantation and is responsible for relapse. This phase 3, placebo-controlled trial investigated the efficacy of lenalidomide maintenance therapy after transplantation. METHODS: We randomly assigned 614 patients younger than 65 years of age who had nonprogressive disease after first-line transplantation to maintenance treatment with either lenalidomide (10 mg per day for the first 3 months, increased to 15 mg if tolerated) or placebo until relapse. The primary end point was progression-free survival. RESULTS: Lenalidomide maintenance therapy improved median progression-free survival (41 months, vs. 23 months with placebo; hazard ratio, 0.50; P<0.001). This benefit was observed across all patient subgroups, including those based on the β(2)-microglobulin level, cytogenetic profile, and response after transplantation. With a median follow-up period of 45 months, more than 70% of patients in both groups were alive at 4 years. The rates of grade 3 or 4 peripheral neuropathy were similar in the two groups. The incidence of second primary cancers was 3.1 per 100 patient-years in the lenalidomide group versus 1.2 per 100 patient-years in the placebo group (P=0.002). Median event-free survival (with events that included second primary cancers) was significantly improved with lenalidomide (40 months, vs. 23 months with placebo; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Lenalidomide maintenance after transplantation significantly prolonged progression-free and event-free survival among patients with multiple myeloma. Four years after randomization, overall survival was similar in the two study groups. (Funded by the Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00430365.).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa1114138

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Lenalidomide is the standard of care for maintenance therapy for most patients with multiple myeloma.

    “Lenalidomide is the standard of care for maintenance therapy for most patients.142–147”

    From Multiple myeloma: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and management (2024) · cites this paper as [142]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) supports lenalidomide maintenance after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem-cell transplantation, while emphasizing that its benefits must be weighed against increased risks. The trial studied patients younger than 65 after first-line transplantation; it does not establish lenalidomide as the standard of care for most patients with multiple myeloma. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Patients who have disease progression while not on treatment with lenalidomide can often be re-treated effectively with this agent, sometimes multiple times, and typically in combination with proteasome inhibitors such as carfilzomib and ixazomib or with daratumumab.

    “Patients who have disease progression while not on treatment with lenalidomide can often be re-treated effectively with this agent37,38, sometimes multiple times, and typically in combination with proteasome inhibitors such as carfilzomib39 and ixazomib40 or with daratumumab41.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [4]4. Erra- tum, N Engl J Med 2004;350:2628.]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Attal, M., Lauwers-Cances, V., Marit, G., Caillot, D., Moreau, P., Facon, T., Stoppa, A. M., Hulin, C., Benboubker, L., Garderet, L., Decaux, O., Leyvraz, S., Vekemans, M.-C., Voillat, L., Michallet, M., Pegourie, B., Dumontet, C., Roussel, M., Leleu, X., Mathiot, C., Payen, C., Avet-Loiseau, H., & Harousseau, J.-L.
Affiliations
  • Hôpital Purpan (FR)
  • CHU Dijon Bourgogne (FR)
  • Hôpital Claude Huriez (FR)
  • Institut Paoli-Calmettes (FR)
  • Centre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Nancy (FR)
  • Hôpital Saint-Antoine (FR)
  • Hôpital Pontchaillou (FR)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CH)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besançon (FR)
  • Hôpital Edouard Herriot (FR)
  • Institut Curie (FR)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2012-05-10
Volume
366
Issue
19
Pages
1782-1791
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2128084036
Cited by
1,155
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 61 · 2022: 70 · 2021: 85 · 2020: 79 · 2019: 68 · 2018: 83 · 2017: 98 · 2016: 108 · 2015: 86 · 2014: 102 · 2013: 133 · 2012: 68
FWCI
82.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Libraries (submittedVersion)
  • Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles) (submittedVersion)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Bone health and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
Keywords
lenalidomide, maintenance therapy, multiple myeloma, autologous stem cell transplantation, progression-free survival, event-free survival, secondary malignancies, peripheral neuropathy, young patients, residual disease
MeSH terms
Lenalidomide, Adult, Aged, Antineoplastic Agents, Double-Blind Method, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Myeloma, Thalidomide, Neoplasms, Second Primary, Disease-Free Survival, Stem Cell Transplantation, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Young Adult, Maintenance Chemotherapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review