Cited by 72Breast Cancer Treatment StudiesCancer Treatment and PharmacologyBreast Lesions and Carcinomas

Paclitaxel With Inhibitor of Apoptosis Antagonist, LCL161, for Localized Triple-Negative Breast Cancer, Prospectively Stratified by Gene Signature in a Biomarker-Driven Neoadjuvant Trial

Open access
Bardia, Aditya, Parton, Marina, Kümmel, Sherko, Estévez, Laura G., Huang, Chiun-Sheng, Cortés, Javier, Ruiz-Borrego, Manuel, Telli, Melinda L. +12 more·2018·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: There are currently no targeted therapies approved for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). A tumor necrosis factor α ( TNFα)–based gene expression signature (GS) predictive of sensitivity to LCL161, inhibitor of apoptosis antagonist, was translated into a clinical assay and evaluated in a neoadjuvant trial. Patients and Methods: Women with localized TNBC (T2/N0–2/M0) were prospectively stratified by GS status and randomly assigned (1:1) to receive oral LCL161 (1,800 mg once per week) and intravenous paclitaxel (80 mg/m 2 once per week; combination arm) or paclitaxel alone (control arm) for 12 weeks, followed by surgery. The primary objective was to determine whether neoadjuvant LCL161 enhances efficacy of paclitaxel, defined by > 7.5% increase in the pathologic complete response (pCR, breast) rate, stratified by GS. Results: Of 209 patients enrolled (207 with valid GS scores), 30.4% had GS-positive TNBC. In the GS-positive group, pCR was higher in the combination versus the control arm (38.2% v 17.2%), with 88.8% posterior probability of > 7.5% increase in pCR. However, in the GS-negative group, the pCR was lower in the combination group (5.6% v 16.4%), with 0% posterior probability of > 7.5% increase in pCR. A higher incidence of grade 3 or 4 adverse events in the combination arm included neutropenia (24.5%) and diarrhea (5.7%). Overall, 19 patients (18.1%) in the combination arm discontinued treatment because of adverse events, including pyrexia (n = 5), pneumonia (n = 4), and pneumonitis (n = 4), versus five patients (4.9%) in the control arm. Conclusion: This neoadjuvant trial provides evidence supporting a biomarker-driven targeted therapy approach for selected patients with GS-positive TNBC and demonstrates the utility of a neoadjuvant trial for biomarker validation and drug development, but also highlights toxicity risk. Future neoadjuvant clinical trials should carefully weigh these considerations for targeted therapy development in biomarker-defined TNBC.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2017.74.8392

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Researchers have developed related drugs, including GDC-0152, GDC-0917 (CUDC-427), LCL-161, AT-406 (Xevinapant, Debio1143), Birinapant (TL32711), ASTX-660.

    “Researchers have developed related drugs, including GDC-0152 (184),459 GDC-0917 (CUDC-427) (185),460 LCL-161 (186),461 AT-406 (Xevinapant, Debio1143) (187),462 Birinapant (TL32711) (188),463 ASTX-660 (189).464”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bardia, A., Parton, M., Kümmel, S., Estévez, L. G., Huang, C.-S., Cortés, J., Ruiz-Borrego, M., Telli, M. L., Martin-Martorell, P., López, R., Beck, J. T., Ismail-Khan, R., Chen, S.-C., Hurvitz, S. A., Mayer, I. A., Carreon, D., Cameron, S., Liao, S., Baselga, J., & Kim, S.-B.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Aditya Bardia, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston; Scott Cameron and Serena Liao, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Cambridge, MA; Marina Parton, The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom; Sherko Kümmel, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany; Laura G. Estévez, Centro Integral Oncológico Clara Campal; Javier Cortés, University Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid; Javier Cortés,Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona; Manuel Ruiz-Borrego,...
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2018-11-01
Volume
36
Issue
31
Pages
3126-3133
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2891818168
Cited by
72
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 7
FWCI
2.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Breast Lesions and Carcinomas
Keywords
triple-negative breast cancer, paclitaxel, LCL161, neoadjuvant therapy, pathological complete response, biomarker validation, drug toxicity, neutropenia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review