Cited by 9Cancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersTransplantation: Methods and OutcomesOrgan and Tissue Transplantation Research

The outcome of checkpoint inhibitor therapy in patients with cancer and solid organ transplant: A systematic review of the literature.

Hassan, Noha Abdelwahab, Abudayyeh, Ala, Shah, Mohsin, Johnson, Daniel Hartman, Suarez-Almazor, Maria E., Diab, Adi·2018·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

41 Background: Solid organ transplant recipients have been excluded from Checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) clinical trials because of the concern of allo-immunity and possible organ rejection. Methods: We searched 5 databases through September 2017. Studies describing the use of CPI to treat cancer in solid organ transplant Patients (pts), and provided detailed description of each case were included. Results: Sixteen publications met inclusion criteria, reporting on 19 cases. Median age of pts was 59 (14-77) yrs and 74% were male. Cancer types included melanoma (n=11), cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (ca) (n=3), non-small cell lung ca and hepatocellular ca (n=2 each), and duodenal ca (n=1). Median time to start CPI after organ transplant was 11 (1-25) yrs. Nivolumab (nivo) was used in 53%, ipilimumab (ipi) in 26%, and pembrolizumab (pem) in 21%. Most pts were maintained on low dose prednisone (≤ 10 mg), mTOR inhibitors, and other immunosuppressives prior to initiating CPI. Graft rejection occurred in 10 of 19 pts (7/12 kidney, 2/5 liver, and 1/2 heart transplants), 90% after receiving anti PD-1, and CPI was discontinued. Median time to rejection was 21 (5-60) days, and obtained biopsies were suggestive of a T-cell mediated rejection process. Only a cardiac transplant recipient with a bioposy proven cellular rejection after nivo, had improved ejection fraction after pulse steroids. Aside from rejection no other immune related adverse events (irAEs) reported. Nivo re-challenge was recommended for a kidney recipient 12 weeks after the rejection process, and the pt had partial tumor response but remained on hemodialysis. Of the 9 pts who had no rejection, 4 had irAEs (hepatitis, colitis, pneumonitis, and dermatitis), including 3 who required high-dose steroids with subsequent improvement, and the remaining 5 pts did not experience any irAEs. Clinical benefit rate was 57% of all pts. Two pts with liver transplants died within 1 month of nivo treatment secondary to acute liver rejection, and 2 others died because of progressive cancer. Conclusions: CPI seem to be associated with high rate of rejection. Multi-institutional collaborative studies are warranted to enhance our understanding of the pathogenesis and plan optiomal therapy that maintain graft tolerance without dampening antitumor clinical benefits.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2018.36.5_suppl.41

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hassan, N. A., Abudayyeh, A., Shah, M., Johnson, D. H., Suarez-Almazor, M. E., & Diab, A.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
  • Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans (US)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2018-02-10
Volume
36
Issue
5_suppl
Pages
41-41
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2791578307
Cited by
9
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
Type
conference abstract
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Transplantation › Organ and Tissue Transplantation Research
Keywords
immune checkpoint inhibitors, solid organ transplant recipients, graft rejection, immune-related adverse events, nivolumab, ipilimumab, pembrolizumab, anti-PD-1 therapy, melanoma, cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, kidney transplantation, liver transplantation, heart transplantation, immunosuppression, T cell-mediated rejection, cancer immunotherapy safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review