Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 2,435

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Testing in Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Clinical Practice Guideline Focused Update

Open access
Wolff, Antonio C., Hammond, M. Elizabeth Hale, Allison, Kimberly H., Harvey, Brittany E., Mangu, Pamela B., Bartlett, John M.S., Bilous, Michael, Ellis, Ian O., Fitzgibbons, Patrick, Hanna, Wedad, Jenkins, Robert B., Press, Michael F., Spears, Patricia A., Vance, Gail H., Viale, Giuseppe, McShane, Lisa M., Dowsett, Mitchell·2018·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: To update key recommendations of the American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) testing in breast cancer guideline. Methods: Based on the signals approach, an Expert Panel reviewed published literature and research survey results on the observed frequency of less common in situ hybridization (ISH) patterns to update the recommendations. Recommendations: Two recommendations addressed via correspondence in 2015 are included. First, immunohistochemistry (IHC) 2+ is defined as invasive breast cancer with weak to moderate complete membrane staining observed in > 10% of tumor cells. Second, if the initial HER2 test result in a core needle biopsy specimen of a primary breast cancer is negative, a new HER2 test may (not “must”) be ordered on the excision specimen based on specific clinical criteria. The HER2 testing algorithm for breast cancer is updated to address the recommended work-up for less common clinical scenarios (approximately 5% of cases) observed when using a dual-probe ISH assay. These scenarios are described as ISH group 2 ( HER2/chromosome enumeration probe 17 [CEP17] ratio ≥ 2.0; average HER2 copy number < 4.0 signals per cell), ISH group 3 ( HER2/CEP17 ratio < 2.0; average HER2 copy number ≥ 6.0 signals per cell), and ISH group 4 ( HER2/CEP17 ratio < 2.0; average HER2 copy number ≥ 4.0 and < 6.0 signals per cell). The diagnostic approach includes more rigorous interpretation criteria for ISH and requires concomitant IHC review for dual-probe ISH groups 2 to 4 to arrive at the most accurate HER2 status designation (positive or negative) based on combined interpretation of the ISH and IHC assays. The Expert Panel recommends that laboratories using single-probe ISH assays include concomitant IHC review as part of the interpretation of all single-probe ISH assay results. Find additional information at www.asco.org/breast-cancer-guidelines .

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2018.77.8738

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 45

  1. 10.1200/JCO.2013.50.9984 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1200/JCO.2006.09.2775 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.5858/2007-131-18-ASOCCO · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.5858/arpa.2013-0953-SA · DOI · Paper page
  5. Fehrenbacher L, Cecchini RS, Geyer CE, et al: NSABP B-47 (NRG oncology): Phase III randomized trial comparing adjuvant chemotherapy with adriamycin (A) and cyclophosphamide (C) → (A) weekly paclitaxel (WP), or docetaxel (T) and C with or without a year of trastuzumab (H) in women with node-positive or high-risk node-negative invasive breast cancer (IBC) expressing HER2 staining intensity of IHC 1+ or 2+ with negative FISH (HER2-Low IBC). Presented at San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, December 5-9, 2017 San Antonio, TX · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs17-gs1-02
  6. Middleton LP, 2009, Arch Pathol Lab Med, 133, 775, 10.5858/133.5.775 · DOI
  7. 10.1136/jclinpath-2014-202571 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1200/JCO.2014.55.6092 · DOI
  9. 10.1200/JCO.2016.66.6693 · DOI
  10. 10.1200/JCO.2015.61.8983 · DOI
  11. 10.5858/arpa.2016-0009-OA · DOI
  12. 10.1200/JCO.2016.70.5319 · doi:10.1200/jco.2016.70.5319
  13. 10.1200/JCO.2014.59.7559 · DOI
  14. 10.1038/modpathol.2016.175 · doi:10.1038/modpathol.2016.175
  15. 10.1200/JCO.2014.59.7211 · doi:10.1200/jco.2014.59.7211
  16. Lim TH, 2016, Arch Pathol Lab Med, 140, 140, 10.5858/arpa.2015-0108-OA · DOI
  17. Bethune GC, 2015, Histopathology, 67, 880, 10.1111/his.12723 · doi:10.1111/his.12723
  18. 10.1093/ajcp/aqw224 · doi:10.1093/ajcp/aqw224
  19. 10.1111/his.12147 · doi:10.1111/his.12147
  20. 10.1093/annonc/mdp234 · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdp234
  21. 10.1038/modpathol.2013.103 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1200/JCO.2011.36.0107 · DOI
  23. 10.1309/9EYM6VE58F2YCD9F · doi:10.1309/9eym6ve58f2ycd9f
  24. 10.1007/s10549-009-0539-2 · doi:10.1007/s10549-009-0539-2
  25. 10.1002/path.2574 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1038/modpathol.2009.78 · DOI
  27. 10.1007/s12253-014-9852-0 · doi:10.1007/s12253-014-9852-0
  28. 10.1002/cncr.30460 · DOI
  29. 10.1093/ajcp/aqv018 · doi:10.1093/ajcp/aqv018
  30. 10.1016/j.clbc.2017.03.012 · doi:10.1016/j.clbc.2017.03.012
  31. 10.1309/AJCP3Q9WFOQTKUVV · doi:10.1309/ajcp3q9wfoqtkuvv
  32. 10.1371/journal.pone.0140652 · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0140652
  33. Xu Y, 2016, Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi, 45, 545
  34. 10.1007/s00428-015-1871-z · doi:10.1007/s00428-015-1871-z
  35. Singh K, 2016, Breast Cancer Res Treat, 157, 405, 10.1007/s10549-016-3824-x · doi:10.1007/s10549-016-3824-x
  36. 10.1007/s10549-016-3717-z · doi:10.1007/s10549-016-3717-z
  37. 10.1309/AJCPE5NCHWPSMR5D · doi:10.1309/ajcpe5nchwpsmr5d
  38. 10.1200/JCO.2017.74.0472 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1200/JCO.2016.67.0182 · DOI
  40. 10.1200/JCO.2015.65.8609 · DOI
  41. 10.1200/JCO.2015.61.1459 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1200/JCO.2014.56.7479 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1200/JCO.2013.54.0948 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1200/JCO.2013.54.0955 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1200/JCO.2009.25.6529 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 2,435

Metadata

Authors
Wolff, A. C., Hammond, M. E. H., Allison, K. H., Harvey, B. E., Mangu, P. B., Bartlett, J. M. S., Bilous, M., Ellis, I. O., Fitzgibbons, P., Hanna, W., Jenkins, R. B., Press, M. F., Spears, P. A., Vance, G. H., Viale, G., McShane, L. M., & Dowsett, M.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2018-07-10
Volume
36
Issue
20
Pages
2105-2122
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2806209829
Cited by
2,435
References
2
FWCI
53.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Testing in Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Clinical Practice Guideline Focused Update. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2018.77.8738
The paper
Wolff, A. C., Hammond, M. E. H., Allison, K. H., Harvey, B. E., Mangu, P. B., Bartlett, J. M. S., Bilous, M., Ellis, I. O., Fitzgibbons, P., Hanna, W., Jenkins, R. B., Press, M. F., Spears, P. A., Vance, G. H., Viale, G., McShane, L. M., & Dowsett, M. (2018). Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Testing in Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Clinical Practice Guideline Focused Update. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2018.77.8738

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.