The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Recommendations on Disease Management for Patients With Advanced Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Positive Breast Cancer and Brain Metastases: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: To provide formal expert consensus–based recommendations to practicing oncologists and others on the management of brain metastases for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) –positive advanced breast cancer. Methods: The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) convened a panel of medical oncology, radiation oncology, guideline implementation, and advocacy experts and conducted a systematic review of the literature. When that failed to yield sufficiently strong quality evidence, the Expert Panel undertook a formal expert consensus–based process to produce these recommendations. ASCO used a modified Delphi process. The panel members drafted recommendations, and a group of other experts joined them for two rounds of formal ratings of the recommendations. Results: No studies or existing guidelines met the systematic review criteria; therefore, ASCO conducted a formal expert consensus–based process. Recommendations: Patients with brain metastases should receive appropriate local therapy and systemic therapy, if indicated. Local therapies include surgery, whole-brain radiotherapy, and stereotactic radiosurgery. Treatments depend on factors such as patient prognosis, presence of symptoms, resectability, number and size of metastases, prior therapy, and whether metastases are diffuse. Other options include systemic therapy, best supportive care, enrollment onto a clinical trial, and/or palliative care. Clinicians should not perform routine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to screen for brain metastases, but rather should have a low threshold for MRI of the brain because of the high incidence of brain metastases among patients with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Azzoli, C. G., Baker, S., Temin, S., Pao, W., Aliff, T., Brahmer, J., Johnson, D. H., Laskin, J. L., Masters, G., Milton, D., et al. (2009) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2009.23.5622 · Cited by 915
Self-citation
Cited by
Patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models in basic and translational breast cancer research
Dobrolecki, L. E., Airhart, S. D., Alferez, D. G., Aparicio, S., Behbod, F., Bentires-Alj, M., Brisken, C., Bult, C. J., Cai, S., Clarke, R. B., et al. (2016) · Cancer and Metastasis Reviews · doi:10.1007/s10555-016-9653-x · Cited by 267
Metadata
- Authors
- Ramakrishna, N., Temin, S., Chandarlapaty, S., Crews, J. R., Davidson, N. E., Esteva, F. J., Giordano, S. H., Gonzalez-Angulo, A. M., Kirshner, J. J., Krop, I., Levinson, J., Modi, S., Patt, D. A., Perez, E. A., Perlmutter, J., Winer, E. P., & Lin, N. U.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2014-07-01
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 2100-2108
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2118600577
- Cited by
- 191
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recommendations on Disease Management for Patients With Advanced Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Positive Breast Cancer and Brain Metastases: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2013.54.0955
- The paper
- Ramakrishna, N., Temin, S., Chandarlapaty, S., Crews, J. R., Davidson, N. E., Esteva, F. J., Giordano, S. H., Gonzalez-Angulo, A. M., Kirshner, J. J., Krop, I., Levinson, J., Modi, S., Patt, D. A., Perez, E. A., Perlmutter, J., Winer, E. P., & Lin, N. U. (2014). Recommendations on Disease Management for Patients With Advanced Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Positive Breast Cancer and Brain Metastases: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2013.54.0955
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.